It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Koka
How would you fight a war against a foe that has unpresidented resources and funds, when you are under manned, under funded, undermined, misunderstood, misrepresented and under attack?
[edit on 24-6-2004 by Koka]
Originally posted by Koka
How do you suggest the Palestinians fight there cause, or do you believe they don't have rights to their own land or maybe the global police can go in and liberate the oppressed Palestinians, from the illegally occupying force. Suppose they would have to stop funding that force first though, that or risk being called hypocrits.
[edit on 24-6-2004 by Koka]
Originally posted by esdad71
America was founded on terrorist acts, or guerilla warfare, or whatever term you choose to use. One group wants to scare another group into change. Please read this little tidbit....
On the evening of December 16, 1773, three companies of fifty men each, masquerading as Mohawk Indians, passed through a tremendous crowd of spectators, went aboard the three ships, broke open the tea chests, and heaved them into the harbor.As the electrifying news of the Boston "tea party" spread, other seaports followed the example and staged similar acts of resistance of their own.'
Fast Forward to 9/11 20 some men disguised as business men board planes and take 4000 lives.....
These are 2 instances, however, they can both be percieved as acts of terrorism....both led to war....
Originally posted by Koka
Blarney, please give an example of two powers equally balanced that have used terrorist tactics.
How would you fight a war against a foe that has unpresidented resources and funds, when you are under manned, under funded, undermined, misunderstood, misrepresented and under attack?
I guess you have never had the misfortune of being the underdog, maybe your country has never been invaded\occupied by a hostile force, or maybe your blinkers are too tight.
How do you suggest the Palestinians fight there cause, or do you believe they don't have rights to their own land or maybe the global police can go in and liberate the oppressed Palestinians, from the illegally occupying force. Suppose they would have to stop funding that force first though, that or risk being called hypocrits.
I look forward to the day a true democratic representation of all cultures/countries and creeds governs this planet, one that does not manipulate the circumstances for their own economic and power hungry benefit.
[edit on 24-6-2004 by Koka]
Originally posted by crmanager
Make no mistake about the fact the U.S. would behead someone on tape if it was the means to an end.
The acts the U.S have done for its own interest would make your toes curl. Heck the U.S. taught most of the tortures how to do their job better (School of the Americas?)
If China moved on Taiwan they would respond. Is That terrorism? I don't know.
But I have to state, a country doing an act you do not agree with is not terrorism. Jusy a handy catch phrase that makes you sound very uninformed.
Do not use the dictionary definition. Terrorism is using acts deemed worthy to scare a people into acting how you want. The victim is arbitrary.
Originally posted by crmanager
Make no mistake about the fact the U.S. would behead someone on tape if it was the means to an end.
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
Well said Q and well said Ghost. But unfortunately your words will go unheeded, because according to the stuff I'm reading in this thread, when you're non-American that automatically means you know more about America and what it's like to be American and the American way life than real Americans.
There is no justification in attacking innocent civilians, no matter who you are, what they have done, or how you live. WTC was unjustified and took us by suprise killing thousands of inoccent human beings.
If they have to use terrorist's tactics then they should at least put effort into bombing a militarycompound which I'm sure they do occasionally.
we don't target civilians directly and we are rebuilding Iraq, did you see any Al-Queda members help clean up the mess they made, do you see them designing the buliding in honor of the Trade Center
All of you socialist America bashers are a difficult bunch to reason with. Arguing with a socialist is like trying to teach a pig to sing, it is a waste of time and annoys the pig.
Well, simply - WHY are they at war? Exactly what has America done that is so wrong?
Basically, the only reason that the US is even over there is because terrorists attacked our country, these terrorists are mostly of Arabic blood and operate and train out of middle eastern countries.
Terrorism is using acts deemed worthy to scare a people into acting how you want. The victim is arbitrary.
Blarney, please give an example of two powers equally balanced that have used terrorist tactics.
How would you fight a war against a foe that has unpresidented resources and funds, when you are under manned, under funded, undermined, misunderstood, misrepresented and under attack?
I guess you have never had the misfortune of being the underdog, maybe your country has never been invaded\occupied by a hostile force, or maybe your blinkers are too tight.
How do you suggest the Palestinians fight there cause, or do you believe they don't have rights to their own land or maybe the global police can go in and liberate the oppressed Palestinians, from the illegally occupying force. Suppose they would have to stop funding that force first though, that or risk being called hypocrits.
Let's say two boys are living in the same street, the only difference being one boy has received a bicycle for his birthday. The other boy is very jealous because he doesn't understand why he can't have a bicycle and his neighbor can. What does he do? He goes and pierces the tires. Of course doing so is wrong and will not get him a bicycle. The situation will more likely get worse, because the boy who owns the bicycle will get really angry and baste his neighbor, then the parents will get involved and so on...The boy didn't achieve his goal by committing an "act of terror". But he will do exactly the same thing the next time he faces a similar situation unless he's taught a better way.
Civilians represent their country. That's reason enough.
Also, to say WTC was unjustified would be disregarding of a whole range of events that have made these guys mad during the past years. People don't commit suicide for nothing, neither did the Kamikaze back in WWII.