It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
If you choose not to abstain don't come whining about a baby then.
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
And why should men have an equal say over a baby growing in a females womb? They are not assuming the risk of the pregnancy thus their risk assessment is lower...
The point is men have the upper hand and all the control over who can possibly get pregnant with their precious swimmers
Do not deposit your precious tender into a bank you don't want to do lifetime business with!
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
Choose women you would not mind being mothers to your children. In other words accept responsiblity for the actions of your reproductive organs.
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
Men already have reproductive rights. They have the right to keep their pants zipped if they can't step up to the plate.
Originally posted by OceanStone
The same could be said about the woman.
Originally posted by Hefficide
She sure does have that right.
But if she finds herself pregnant, she also has the right to abortion.
And if she carries full term she also has the right to file for child support from the father.
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
reply to post by mayertuck
You accused me of flip flopping.
I am asking for a specific in thread flip flop, but I appreciate knowing if you cannot locate one (I thought I had been quite steady and sure in my convictions here) you will continue to misrepresent me.
All of my posts in this thread are accessible in order by clicking the button at the bottom of this post that says THREAD.
Then answer the questions please, unfortunately either answer you give will be a flip flop. So I can understand how you would not want to answer, because with your "convictions" you could not flip flop when presented with the paralle arguments.
Once again as I said if you can show that you are not or will not I will be more than happy to remove. .
edit on 18-9-2010 by hotbakedtater because: add
It may be he is tired of "debating" with people who have a skewed view of responsibility.
As previously stated children are taught at a very young age in the country the ramifications of sex. They know it can lead to pregnancy and std's. If one chooses to lie down one takes the responsibility upon themselves for those ramifications.
If one creates a child one is responsible for said child until the child comes of age. No ifs, ands or buts about it.
I know that this country allows abortion but in my limited world view abortion is not a form of birth control.
Girls using abortion as birth control and having up to FOUR terminations by the age of 18
www.dailymail.co.uk...
Abortion in my view is reserved for rapes or life threatening pregnancies.
All other pregnancies in a fair and just world result in children. Those children were created by two people and both of those people are responsible in equal proportions to the care and well being of that child. For the law to step in and say otherwise is just wrong.
My opinion: women who use abortion as a means of birth control should be spayed.
Men who want to avoid responsibility for children they've fathered should be neutered.
With all of the methods of pregnancy prevention we have access to along with taking personal responsibility for your prevention methods this discussion should not even be an issue. Irresponsible acts followed by irresponsible acts.
I've told my stepson that it is his responsibility to protect himself no matter what the girl tells him. If she says she's on the pill, use a condom. Provide his own condom. Never let the condom out of his control. Make sure his condoms are fresh. I've also told him condoms break. Condoms can be defective.
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
Back in November of 2007 the plaintiff in the OP case lost his appeal.
en.wikipedia.org...
The court cited the Fourteenth Amendment.
I do not think the idea of a male opt out is going over well with the courts.
Males have not been denied a pregnancy opt out.
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by Jwbmore
The right to forfeit parental rights already exists. But I doubt any judge would allow it simply because a man didn't feel like he wanted to be a parent. Sex causes pregnancy, ergo, if you don't want to be a dad, then don't have sex. It's simple.
Saying that a guy should be able to get sex and then should be able to refuse to be a parent is like saying that I should be able to jump off the roof and not have to hit the ground. It's cause and effect. It's common sense.
Originally posted by SeenMyShare
My opinion: women who use abortion as a means of birth control should be spayed. Men who want to avoid responsibility for children they've fathered should be neutered. With all of the methods of pregnancy prevention we have access to along with taking personal responsibility for your prevention methods this discussion should not even be an issue. Irresponsible acts followed by irresponsible acts.
I've told my stepson that it is his responsibility to protect himself no matter what the girl tells him. If she says she's on the pill, use a condom. Provide his own condom. Never let the condom out of his control. Make sure his condoms are fresh. I've also told him condoms break. Condoms can be defective. He knows the ramifications and if he fathers a child he knows his responsibility!
Originally posted by SeenMyShare
reply to post by mayertuck
Thanks Mayertuck, but I don't need a gold star for doing my job. My thanks comes from two well adjusted adult children that stand up to their responsibilities and take them very seriously. My son is an awesome father and married a good woman. My step son doesn't want children and knows how to prevent them. He also knows that if he fails at prevention he is responsible for that child. I've done my job : ).
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by chefc14
To the contrary. I would say that to a woman as well. I think I've been coming across as anti-male in this thread because of the topic - specifically the subject of men wanting to opt out of child support simply because they felt trapped.
In reality I feel, and have said several times in this thread, that both parents are obligated. Not just the father.
Originally posted by Hefficide
Originally posted by mayertuck
reply to post by Hefficide
So its just the mothers that get an avenue to escape that responsibility correct?
It's only the mothers who have to carry an embryo for nine months.
It's only the mothers who risk their physical health to bring forth life.
So, yes, it's only a mother who has the ultimate right to decide about surgical procedures to her body.
Do you think that a woman should have the right to force her male lover to have a vasectomy or the surgery required to be a eunuch? Because that is the inverse of your argument here.
Originally posted by mayertuck
I have never said that you were anti-male, nor do I think you are. I do however think that you are placing all of the responsibility on the person with the least amount of choice in the matter, while pushing an unrealistic solution.