It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
While I admire your dedication to the pro-life movement....
The fact that a woman can abort a pregnancy still does NOT justify a man refusing to live up to his paternal duties.
Your misogyny is showing.
Again, you have to resort to putting words into my mouth. It's a sore substitute for actual substance.
This is the most valid statement you have made yet.
Ah... With the emasculating humor. That's fun too. I can actually smell your desperation now.
Pregnancy is a decision?
Pregnancy is the result of sex, which both HE and SHE participated in.
Now your misogyny is really showing. Along with an apparent fear of women.
I expected more out of you than this, Edrick
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
reply to post by mayertuck
I am not answering that question, it is off topic. I won't address it in this thread either. I see you are also going to leave the misrepresentaion up, that I flip flop on the topic at hand.
Originally posted by SeenMyShare
I can only supply my own thoughts to this topic as they relate to me.
When my son's father sent his first $15 check and no more I decided then and there that I would provide for my son. I asked no one for help (including his father) and did what I had to do. I worked construction, I worked a sewing factory job, I babysat, I cleaned motels, and I became an auto mechanic. I did whatever job I had to do to make sure my son ate, had a roof and warm bed, had clothing and hot and cold running water.
I've done the same for my step son when his parents wouldn't stand up.
Both parties have free reign to engage in "that behavior".
Originally posted by mayertuck
reply to post by Solomons
Yes that is the simplest solution. Does it make it right? Should a man have to forgoe an experience because of the risk and give a female free reign to engage of that behavior? I for one say no.
I'm not even going to break down your latest manifesto against abortion post. It's not worth my time. You've posted nothing but an attack without any substance or addition.
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
Both parties have free reign to engage in "that behavior".
Originally posted by mayertuck
reply to post by Solomons
Yes that is the simplest solution. Does it make it right? Should a man have to forgoe an experience because of the risk and give a female free reign to engage of that behavior? I for one say no.
Both know their Fair Reproductive Choices befor they lie down together.
If a man has such little control that he just has to get out there and experience sex at all costs, is it so much to expect the same man to be wise in his choice of sexual partner?
If he is "experiencing" with a decent woman, there is no problem.
And if not, why am I expected to give a care about his situation if she does happen to get pregnant?
This entire topic comes down to CHOICES.
Oh don't make me blush, Edrick.
Originally posted by Edrick
reply to post by hotbakedtater
I expected more out of you than this, Edrick
Wow.... you're copying my style of posting already?
I'm flattered that you think so highly of me.
-Edrick
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
You are discussing employment issues. I am discussing reproduction issues.
Maybe the man would not have to risk his very life to support a child if he had taken responsibility BEFORE it became a life and death issue.
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
reply to post by mayertuck
I was under the assumption we were discussing reproductive choices not gender norming or any of the other off topic tangents you keep bringing up.
Biology has a lot to do with this topic.
Biology has a lot to do with this topic.
THREAD TITLE:
Men's-rights activists seek right to decline fatherhood in event of unplanned pregnancy
Oh don't make me blush, Edrick.
Anyway, don't flatter yourself. it is merely a debate technique called mirroring.
Glad to see my womanly charms have such a flattering effect upon you.
Originally posted by Edrick
reply to post by Hefficide
I'm not even going to break down your latest manifesto against abortion post. It's not worth my time. You've posted nothing but an attack without any substance or addition.
Tuck tail and Run, eh?
Look, it's not my fault that you have an apparent inability to see Reality, or to distinguish it from the fairy tale land that you think IS reality.
You call me a "Woman Hater" because that is what the feminist movement has PROGRAMMED you to do to ANYONE that even *QUESTIONS* the sisterhood, or Feminism, or "Equality" or... whatever.
Your view of Reality is WRONG, and you are ignoring this fact.
Do try to deal with it, for your own sake.
-Edrick