reply to post by Stewie
The buildings did not collapse because a plane flew into each relatively close to the top of the towers. Impossible. Can't happen.
Obviously , you can't back this up with anything that would confirm it .
However , it CAN be proven to be wrong . Planes hit both towers , fires broke out in both towers . One tower collapses due to these events , and , and
, and , wait a minute folks , what is this ? THE OTHER TOWER collapses also .
The collapse of the first tower proved that it could happen . The collapse of the second tower , CONFIRMED that the incident could be replicated .
THAT , my friend , is science in it's truest form , whether you like it or not .
The ludicrous thing about truthers , is that if only one tower had collapsed , you guys would be screaming that it was a conspiracy and the one tower
should not have collapsed because the other tower had also been hit by a plane and sufferred massive fire damage , and did not collapse .
You would be screaming that the standing tower is evidence that the other tower should not have collapsed . And yet , here you have seen one tower
collapse already and you find it inconceivable that the second tower also collapsed .
Which just goes to show , you guys would be screaming inside-job , no matter what might have happened .
As for implosions , please explain to us how implosions will eject debris and tons of steel , hundreds of feet outward and away from the building .
You can't prove any of this and you know it . In case you haven't noticed , most of the "debunkers" on here are more than just slightly educated
Show me PROOF that will confirm just ONE of your conspiracy theories , Just one . Is that easy enough for you ?