It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by C1OUD
I feel that no theory could ever disprove the existance of god in fairness. If a precise mathamatical model existed which described exactly how the universe started, and everything in it etc it would still be failing to tell us WHY we are here, it would just tell us how we are here. besides what good is a mathamatical model on its own. simply observing an equation wont make its described effects occur ie. somthing must have initiated the sequence following the said master equation
I feel that no theory could ever disprove the existance of god in fairness.
What good is a mathamatical model on its own? Simply observing an equation won't make its described effects occur ie. somthing must have initiated the sequence following the said master equation
If a precise mathamatical model existed which described exactly how the universe started, and everything in it etc it would still be failing to tell us WHY we are here.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by Aquarius1
Or, someone is manipulating him for their own gain.
The dude told us to fear aliens. That doesn't sound like Stephen Hawking at all.
Originally posted by AstyanaxThat is correct. However, a properly formulated theory of physics must exclude God as a factor, for otherwise it would explain nothing. 'God did it' is not a helpful or enlightening explanation, except for keeping little children quiet. Even then, it doesn't always work.
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to posts by just an allusion and john_bmth
Oh, I like this. You two are arguing contrary to one another in an attempt to prove the same point. I'll just leave you to settle it between yourselves, shall I?
Just an allusion, your way of looking at science was quite popular back in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, when it was still called 'natural philosophy'. But even the natural philosophers weren't content to sit back and say 'God did it.' They endeavoured to work out how God did it. No miracles allowed.
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to posts by just an allusion and john_bmth
Oh, I like this. You two are arguing contrary to one another in an attempt to prove the same point. I'll just leave you to settle it between yourselves, shall I?
Just an allusion, your way of looking at science was quite popular back in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, when it was still called 'natural philosophy'. But even the natural philosophers weren't content to sit back and say 'God did it.' They endeavoured to work out how God did it. No miracles allowed.