It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'm still stuck on the fact that when they crash the jet with water on board to simulate fuel, it vaporizes pretty much. If that's the case they want to use an example, how do we have intact, though dead, bodies. Bodies still in thier seats etc........correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't they have vaporized too?
Where is the tail section? Are you telling me that a plane as long as that just "accordianed"? The wreckage should have been more "obvious".
Originally posted by mr. toddly
Here's a possible explanation: Flight 77 landed earlier at Andrews Air Force base where all the passengers deplaned. They were then put on some type of military transport-type vehicle that drove them to DC, where they were told that they needed to go into the Pentagon and that everything would be explained to them there. Then boom.
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by felonius
Where is the tail section? Are you telling me that a plane as long as that just "accordianed"? The wreckage should have been more "obvious".
Tail disintergrated on impact - tails or empenage is made of light gaugue aluminium or fiberglass composite
only as strong as needs to be
Weedwhacker if around can probably elaborate
The strongest parts of aircraft are keel beam, which runs lenght of aircraft and supports cabin floor, landing gear
which is some of heaviest parts on aircraft, wing box, area between engines where wing attach to fuselage,
contain heavy duty spars and ribs . Most of aircraft is light gauge aluminium to save weight
Most of AA77 wound up inside building and was not visible
This article gives number of pictures of aircraft debris inside Pentagon
www.rense.com...
Originally posted by exponent
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Um... I don't need their names... I need the people in the pictures identified. Geez.
That's not going to happen, can you imagine the outcry from the families if the Pentagon did release identifiable photos of their loved ones? It would be a particularly brutal kick to the stomach of these families.
Why do you need to identify people in the pictures anyway? DNA evidence is much more reliable, or if you prefer the firefighters accounts you can purchase and read the book referred to on a previous page.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Yeah. Have they asked the families if they can release the names? I guess we can only speculate. In all cases - unless a family came forward - we just have to trust that when they say that body is of someone on the plane, killed in a crash, then that is what it is, and not a Hollywood set or a shot from an entirely different place and time. I would think there would be an effort to ask families to come forth to relieve us of our doubt.
Seriously? As I point out, them just saying we're looking at photos of the scene, when they controlled the taking of any photos, does not remove doubt. Them saying DNA proves something also does not remove doubt. Also, would the fire fighters know they were looking at crash victims as opposed to any hapless Pentagon employees who got mutilated by a missile?
I'm telling you, if there was no wrongdoing in our government, there would be more of an effort to prove things than there is.
Yeah. Have they asked the families if they can release the names? I guess we can only speculate. In all cases - unless a family came forward - we just have to trust that when they say that body is of someone on the plane, killed in a crash, then that is what it is, and not a Hollywood set or a shot from an entirely different place and time. I would think there would be an effort to ask families to come forth to relieve us of our doubt.