posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 08:55 PM
I have a cousin who was part of the EMS/Fire crews on the scene, while I think there is a ton of BS going on here (so does he for that matter, esp..
in regards to other events that day).. He told me that there were commercial plane part/seats, luggage and body parts everywhere. The body parts can
be explained either way, but the commercial airplane seats, luggage, engine parts, landing gear, airline colors on the shredded pieces of aluminum and
so on point to a commercial aircraft.
He however was surprised that there were no marks or severe damage to the building where the wings should have hit. The hole was small as opposed to
the size of the plane???
Also, he questioned the approach angle as he knew many of the people in the area and their recollection of the planes approach was significantly
different than the OS, again???
While it is only a guess on his part, but he thinks based upon what he saw and what others saw that day was that there were two planes involved.
Beyond that he proposed the hole in the Pentagon looked to small to be from a 757, but he could not explain the myriad of commercial plane parts, and
luggage all over the place.
I know this really does not help get any closer to what really happened, just thought I would pass on a first (well second) hand account from someone
who was on site the day of.... It all sounds fishy, no matter how you slice it. Someones story is bogus, proving which is another matter.
edit on 15-9-2010 by mulehound because: spelling