The Upcoming UFO-Nukes Connection Press Conference

Ok, so why no pics/videos of these UFOs? Surely someone with even a camera phone could have clicked some shots of the myriad sightings as claimed? Isn't it surprising that till this day there's nothing to go on except statements/stories?

And until we have incontrovertible proof it's all hogwash! Just like what Greer and the gang spew out! What's the difference?

reply to post by OrionHunterX

Ok, so why no pics/videos of these UFOs? Surely someone with even a camera phone could have clicked some shots of the myriad sightings as claimed? Isn't it surprising that till this day there's nothing to go on except statements/stories?

The majority of reports were filed long before camera phones. A number of reports describe film footage and photographs. Others detail jets being scrambled and radar paints being used to approximate the speed of the 'unknowns.' There are also eye-witness reports by base personnel. This 1950 memo describes photos being taken and reliable witnesses from two incidents at White Sands.

A year earlier, the FBI were referring to at least nine separate incidents of UFO activity at Los Alamos '46 in this report (second last paragraph). It was titled 'Protection of Vital Installations.'

And until we have incontrovertible proof it's all hogwash! Just like what Greer and the gang spew out! What's the difference?

Any, or even all, these reports could be due to terrestrial technology and possibly elaborate security checks. We don't know. The point is that Robert Hastings hasn't invented them all. They aren't 'hogwash' and Hastings is only providing a platform for witnesses to the incidents. Whereas Greer would provide a narrative explanation and define some ET motivations and thought-patterns (involving a profit for Greer), Hastings and the witnesses are simply providing testimony of their sightings or experiences.