It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
Here is another prime example of an out of touch Congress. I one hand the amendment would allow people who join the military or attend college to become legal US Residents. But why do you need another piece of Legislation when all you need is a green card to join the US military and then you are fast tracked to becoming a citizen; As well as you can study in America with a Student VISA?
Is this back door amnesty, like Congress and this Administration has been aiming for all along? Or is it just another amendment that is what it really is? With This Congress who knows? Thoughts?
www.foxnews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
Originally posted by Jenna
This is the kind of thing that irritates the daylights out of me. It's a defense bill and the only things in it should be defense related items. Not this crap.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
You are correct, I would like to see a constitutional amendment that gives the President line item Veto's; then it goes through the process of a normal veto bill. Also I would like Congress to be able to give an up or down vote on Presidential Executive orders for it to be a full law.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
Originally posted by Jenna
This is the kind of thing that irritates the daylights out of me. It's a defense bill and the only things in it should be defense related items. Not this crap.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
You are correct, I would like to see a constitutional amendment that gives the President line item Veto's; then it goes through the process of a normal veto bill. Also I would like Congress to be able to give an up or down vote on Presidential Executive orders for it to be a full law.
Under current power structures, I don't see the possibility of the president throwing a veto at this particular line item, but I get your drift, under a more equitable power structure.
Also, considering the abuses that have been perpetrated by executive order, I'm all for congressional oversight over them. Again, though, under the current powers structure, it might be moot.
Maybe after November...