It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Of course they are. Republicans are obstructionist. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. They know she's a LOT closer to Republican than she is Democrat, so of course they'll back her.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by Alxandro
Getting the incumbents out of office is one thing, but what plans do these people have once they get into office?
Getting incumbents out of office is one thing, it's entirely different once they are in and actually have to work for their constituents. Do they plan to do that?
How well do you know your TEA Party Candidate?
What you are trying to claim is that the Tea Party decided to support Republicans in the primary just to later abandon them for some yet un-named Independent? That is what I am not following.
O'Donell, the Republican with two decades in politics? How is that not "same old?"
Originally posted by mishigas
It's no surprise that you're not following it because I never said it.
She beat Mike Castle, the Rep with 4 decades in politics.
The TPM cannot 'manufacture' candidates with ideal qualifications.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by evil incarnate
Who says we have to be looking for a new way to butter bread? Sticking to good old solid conservative principles is all we ask.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by evil incarnate
What I am saying is that they are not restricted to supporting only Republicans, even though that may be their history so far. Is it so difficult to accept that if an Indy held the same solid conservative values, that the TPM might conceivably support them? That is what my point was.