|
|
Topic started on 22-6-2004 @ 06:14 PM by DJDOHBOY
|
 
Please could members refrain from starting threads that are based around:
what is your favourite gun
who would win if the ??? and ??? went to war with each other
who has the best army/navy/airforce/secret service........
etc etc ...
This forum is for information about Military weapons technology past, present, and future.
Please could we get back to threads with genuine interest.
The above list is subject to change and additions and is not set in stone.
[edit on 22-6-2004 by DJDOHBOY]
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Weaponry topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 22-6-2004 @ 08:08 PM by gooking
|
Aye, bout time.
But I think we should still start a thread about our favority weapons, because it is centered around weapons.
[edit on 22-6-2004 by gooking]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-6-2004 @ 08:42 PM by kaskad
|
Originally posted by DJDOHBOY
Please could members refrain from starting threads that are based around:
what is your favourite gun
who would win if the ??? and ??? went to war with each other
who has the best army/navy/airforce/secret service........
etc etc ...
This forum is for information about Military weapons technology past, present, and future.
Please could we get back to threads with genuine interest.
The above list is subject to change and additions and is not set in stone.
[edit on 22-6-2004 by DJDOHBOY]
I second that.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-6-2004 @ 10:55 AM by muzz
|
Originally posted by DJDOHBOY
This forum is for information about Military weapons technology past, present, and future.
Please could we get back to threads with genuine interest.
The above list is subject to change and additions and is not set in stone.
[edit on 22-6-2004 by DJDOHBOY]
My thread of Laser vs. Rail gun clearly discusses the advancement in the future of weaponry that is iminent in the United States. It had 8+ pages of
replies with something like over 3500 views. I would think that could be constituted as genuine interest. This was not a thread to mine
points(because I have not gotten a single point for any of the replies that are on it, which is being looked at by SkepticOverlord.), nor a thread to
start fights with other members, but a thread to discuss the pro's and con's of this new age of development in weaponary. I think that it is a sad
thing that my thread was moved to Chit-Chat when I think that it is clearly not. If others dissagree, then please let me know, and I'll not post
anymore. -Muzz
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 23-6-2004 @ 04:53 PM by The Vagabond
|
Full marks for you. Sounds like a good thread, and it definately falls under "discussion of future technology".
I wonder if those who replied didn't jeopardize it by making short off-topic posts?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2004 @ 06:45 PM by weirdo
|
Originally posted by DJDOHBOY
Please could members refrain from starting threads that are based around:
what is your favourite gun
who would win if the ??? and ??? went to war with each other
who has the best army/navy/airforce/secret service........
etc etc ...
This forum is for information about Military weapons technology past, present, and future.
Please could we get back to threads with genuine interest.
The above list is subject to change and additions and is not set in stone.
[edit on 22-6-2004 by DJDOHBOY]
Am l missing something but those types of threads are part of the military weapons passed, present or future.I enjoy the subjects and don`t think they
affect this section.Any chance we could have a vote from the members before the mods control us so strictly.I am genuinely interested in these views
as specific info that is reliable is very difficult to find unless people make it up.Members do come from various backrounds and having discustions on
there favorite weapons is relevant to weaponry NO?.Can we have a more relevant section that covers the millitary in general
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-7-2004 @ 09:53 PM by SecretDestroyer
|
Thompson M1927A1 w/50 round drum. And a Colt .45 is all I need. We need more of them to get the gangs out in Chicago to straight'n this place out.
Looking for an original. Original Thompson made by GE (yes GE, brings good thing to life)  Value around $3500 VG Here one thease babies go off,
you'll know it and half the city
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-8-2004 @ 06:42 PM by jrod8900
|
Agreed. I think its quick and easy way some members pick up points. Ya know I think this or that is the best and someone just has to put thier 2 cents
on how this or that is better and so on....
Maybe we need to establish a new section for these kind of threads... because come to think of it, i need some quick and easy points 
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-8-2004 @ 06:01 AM by WestPoint23
|
I think this should not apply it really cuts down on debaters and arguments on this thread. There's is nothing wrong with people discussing who has
the better army and so on. Just thank god this rule wasn't so strict when I needed some quick point 
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-8-2004 @ 06:08 AM by Koka
|
I agree Westpoint23, what are you gonna post about now..?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 10-8-2004 @ 06:12 AM by JCMinJapan
|
Agreed and about time......
For the ones like laster versus rail gun... Well, there you get to have to threads... one about each one. You can talk your heads off and get DOUBLE
the points! wow.... ha ha ha
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-8-2004 @ 06:14 AM by kangaxx
|
so...now they even close and transfer topics about laser technology to chit chat, or close them....If Torquemada was alife, he surly will rule in
this boards!...The inquisition is back!! prepare for the censor machine!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-8-2004 @ 06:22 PM by weirdo
|
I thought you Kangaxx was not going to post anymore on this site always true to your your word l read
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-8-2004 @ 06:26 PM by soothsayer
|
Even though this thread was made months ago, and action had taken place to enforce it... we still see threads like 'Best looking Fighter' and
'Ugliest Bomber Ever'...
Oh well, some things never change...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-8-2004 @ 06:30 PM by deevee
|
I always disliked the point whore posts. They're not being censcored now, ya just gotta do it for free in BTS.
If it interests you, whadda ya care if you get points or not, it's about the response.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-8-2004 @ 06:43 PM by weirdo
|
People have to write something,not every spook or govt employee is going to post something secret on this site, most of the topics on this site are
posted by people that have not specific proof or knowledge of the subject.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 7-9-2004 @ 10:54 PM by ~Beta1.0~
|
youre all crazy Lol
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2004 @ 09:40 AM by Maverick8
|
it depends on who you are tlking about
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-10-2004 @ 03:15 AM by Daedalus3
|
I think that this is a very blurred area to pass judgement on and since im new i would like to see such discussions myself at least once. i think
this needs to be dealt from a topic-to-topic wise indivisual basis as some discussions may actually be interesting. I think no 'general rule' should
be declared.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-10-2004 @ 06:34 PM by bloodlust11009
|
M-14 and colt 45 nuff said
|
copyright & usage
|
 |