Originally posted by turbofan
Do you think John Kerry knew it took more than a few hours to rig a building?
I'll bet he does now!
I'll also bet that's the last time we hear John Kerry say anything about 9/11.
This is almost as good as when Rumsfeld's said, "Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our
citizens, and the missile to damage this building..." [Pentagon]
I watched this when it first hit YouTube but I'm glad I saw it again just now.
Do you think Kerry and (is that his wife?) wore earpieces?
Look at minute mark 1:19.
Watch how she starts nodding her head (as if in agreement) then he does the same thing. They both nod while being asked a question that he later on
says, 'is news to him'. So what the hell are they nodding for if it's something foreign to them?
And again at 2:32 she seems to look up as if someone is talking to her and then motions with her hands at which point, Kerry gives his answer.
"I do know that uh...that wall I remember was in danger and I think they made a decision based on that danger to bring it down in a controlled
Hey John, actually, the decision to bring down Building 7 in a controlled fashion was apparently made well before 9/11. Unless you are one of those
who subscribes to the ludicrous theory that a few oxygen starved office fires caused this massive 47 story building to symmetrically collapse into its
Here is an interesting video which shows WTC Building 7 during the afternoon on 9/11, prior to it being purposefully demolished (for insurance fraud
and possibly other nefarious reasons).
The video shows Building 7 with only four rows of windows blown out on about Floors 9 and 10 and Floors 14 and 15. If this damage was caused by the
debris from the collapsing towers, then the debris from the Towers was very selective in choosing to only damage these four floors. Who would have
thought that random debris falling down would only damage four floors and leave the remainder of the building relatively untouched? Why doesn't the
exterior of the building appear damaged from the falling debris? Not even a scratch on the brown facing.
At 2:30, 2:50 and 3:55 you can make out noises which appear to be explosions in the background. Check out 2:40. Does this look like a building which
is leaning and ready to collapse, as reported by some lying disreputable treasonous individuals? The way some people paint the picture, you would
think this building was in ruins and on its last legs prior to the controlled demo collapse. Oh well, so much for that lie from the OS crowd.
In all fairness, that's the rear of the building with respect to facing the Twins.
What's even more amazing to me are the burned up cars and buses. I've used two different videos to verify
that the bus and adjacent cars were parked on Greenwich street beyond the Barclay intersection.
Funny how those cars caught fire from well over a football field away and blocked by WTC7 from any direct
strike from debris.
That dust most certainly contained energetic particles to react with metal and not set fire to nearby paper.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.