It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DizzyDayDream
reply to post by hippomchippo
hahah palm
to palm.
nice to meet you,
perhaps you would like to meet my above posts.
lol
you didn't read them did you. if you did then re-read them.
As for Stephen Hawkings, I am nothing compared to his greatness, how dare you even attempt to imply i think otherwise. Stop misinterpreting my posts, open your eyes perhaps, and look at your closed mind. I have nothing but respect for the man,
have you read brief history of time?
or the universe in a nut shell?
if not then i highly reccomed you do,
He is responsable for most of my spiritual beleifs! haha wrap your eyes around that one. lol.. seriously though, read these posts properly, you may learn something about this topic.
Originally posted by hippomchippo
"profound synchronicities which clearly Unify the Universe. All mammals have warm blood, Five fingers and toes, two eyes and emotions science has no explanation for, yet. Physics is quickly closing the gap between science and religion... stars shine THROUGHOUT the Universe... look at the amazing common characteristics occurring from the prime movement till now.. what caused that first movement into existence? Intention, consciousness, a pure dimensionless energy"
Actually, It seems like I really have no idea what your point even is, at first I thought you were trying to argue that there has to be a god because we can't explain emotions, even though we can and have explained emotions.
Primum movens (Latin), usually referred to as the First Cause in English, is a term used in the philosophical and theological cosmological argument for the existence of God, and in thinking about cosmogony, the source of the cosmos or "all-being", and spontaneous generation of existence.
In book 12 of his Metaphysics, Aristotle used the phrase τι ὃ οὐ κινούμενον κινεῖ ("something which moves [other things] without [itself] being moved [by anything]")[1] -- i.e., the unmoved mover. When applied in his physics, this led to the view that all natural motions are uncaused and therefore self-explanatory.[2] Causality is linear, so causality or motion must be finally attributed to a first cause, which logically cannot itself be moved, i.e. the unmoved mover. To Aristotle the first cause is energy or energeia (in Greek) or actus (in Latin): energy causes motion. This is the foundation for the theory of actualism, a non-idealist philosophy of nature, science, logic, and mathematics.[3] Aristotle's actualistic ontology is a denial of "potential ontology" - that Being is the first cause of the cosmos.
Originally posted by DizzyDayDream
Hence my point (actually someone else's point on ATS, written in their signature, i happened to read passing through a thread - while still considering myself to be an atheist! lol): "intention is the prime mover"
for me this summarises my point to a T. We cannot exist without a prime mover, i see this as something conscious, with intention - maybe God for want of a better understanding - lol.
wikilink
Originally posted by DizzyDayDream
reply to post by hippomchippo
aaarghhh i thoughts this was coming...
into the rabbit warren we fall...
have you ever played that classic PC game Pong? This is about to go back and forth in much the same way... though perhaps not... i am very good at this game i must warn you.
First i'd like to thank you for addressing my post with a valid refutation of my logic *
However, may i kindly ask you to re-read my previous posts before you responded to them, and perhaps find the answer to that question there..
or to summarise briefly here.. i find it too mysteriously beautiful to be a random sequence of self organisation. Its the clock-maker theory, yes. And you're right for asking about the mystery of the prime mover... ping, then pong, this could go on for years... we know scientifically that energy is the fundamental ingredient of matter, because E=MCsquared, so what im arguing is, this energy of the cosmos IS god, but i think also that god transcends this realm and resides permanently in only one place.. in my opinion the only non-dimensional manifestation of universal energy - his heart...the prime-location of the prime movement, as i said in an earlier post, everything else is fractalised downwards into infinity from that place.
That is my belief. Though i understand it is only a belief, and you are free to believe the opposite to be true, because there are in my opinion equally valid points for suggesting that matter is only conscious in our form as living organisms, though for me this makes little sense because our forms have existed for a fraction of a fraction of a fractions fraction within a decimal points fraction point in the context of the time our universe has existed before life ever evolved and after life has ceased to be possible in this universe.
edit on 16/9/2010 by DizzyDayDream because: spelling
matter forms itself in complex ways ie our minds, the universal connected energy (fact) defies logic if we assume it hasn't already by now formed itself into some form of consciousness,,, which it has through us, but i too think it has everywhere within everything, due to the fact that it IS everything... energy in the universe is Interconnected! how is it possible to remain unaware of its own existence!?
Originally posted by quantum_flux
reply to post by DizzyDayDream
The catholic christian church killed people for making scientific discoveries. It was the brave folks who stood up to that religious beaurocracy and published their discoveries who changed the world for the better.