It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MooradianTheres also been soem rumors of antigravity tech being used then
alien evidence?
you better believe it
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by spikey
reply to post by Turiddu
The 'evidence' is that these 1000+ tonnes quarried, carved and placed colossal stones, can not be moved today by our largest, modern cranes. These gargantuan blocks were lain and set approximately nine-thousand-years-ago!
Originally posted by Turiddu
Originally posted by MooradianTheres also been soem rumors of antigravity tech being used then
alien evidence?
you better believe it
This is a joke right?
Show us the evidence before you make these outrageous claims.
edit on 10-9-2010 by Turiddu because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by spikey
reply to post by Turiddu
Did you read his post?
The 'evidence' is that these 1000+ tonnes quarried, carved and placed colossal stones, can not be moved today by our largest, modern cranes. These gargantuan blocks were lain and set approximately nine-thousand-years-ago!
That's a 9 followed by three 0's, or put another way...9,000 freaking years ago. Twice the reported age of the great pyramids of Egypt. Nearly twice as old as Stonehenge in Wiltshire, England.
According to establish science, humanity at that point in time, NINE THOUSAND YEARS AGO, did little more than run around in animal skins, lived in caves or other primitive accommodations, lived as hunter/gatherers using primitive hunting weapons and farming would not be widely practiced for another 1000-2000 years.
Yet these things were quarried, supposedly using animal bone and stone tools, and then transported over FIVE miles from the quarry site, to be lifted and stacked precisely.
No...it's NOT a joke. There are plenty of websites that carry images of these things, go take a look if you are really interested in leaning something, rather than taking the piss out of anyone who posts somethings you consider to be controversial.
Failing that, why don't you tell us how you think these stones came to be where there are?
edit on 10/9/2010 by spikey because: Missed out info
Originally posted by spikey
The 'evidence' is that these 1000+ tonnes quarried, carved and placed colossal stones, can not be moved today by our largest, modern cranes. These gargantuan blocks were lain and set approximately nine-thousand-years-ago!
That's a 9 followed by three 0's, or put another way...9,000 freaking years ago. Twice the reported age of the great pyramids of Egypt. Nearly twice as old as Stonehenge in Wiltshire, England.
Originally posted by Mooradian
The base columns are over 1000 TONS. thats a weight that even our strongest cranes cannot pick up. These rocks were cut perfectly and placed together so a paper cannot not be inserted between!
(also, the 1000 ton rocks were moved 5 miles =/)
Source
Saxo Grammaticus, for example, argues that giants had to exist, because nothing else would explain the large walls, stone monuments, and statues that we now know were the remains of Roman construction
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
This was mentioned in another thread, yet everything I can find says that the quarry was 1/4 of a mile away, at least for the Trilithon. Why can't people believe that ancient Man was extremely resourceful and ingenious?
Originally posted by spikey
Did you read his post?
Originally posted by spikey
According to establish science, humanity at that point in time, NINE THOUSAND YEARS AGO, did little more than run around in animal skins, lived in caves or other primitive accommodations, lived as hunter/gatherers using primitive hunting weapons and farming would not be widely practiced for another 1000-2000 years.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
We have floating barges today that can easily lift 1,500 tons. Where does everyone get the "we can't lift them today" argument?