It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 6205LH
It does not matter what is truth and what kind of movements are pushing for new investigation... blah... blah... It's not possible anymore, because your country is corrupted on so many possible levels that change is not possible. Not to mention the fact that USA is broke. I am sure that there are many honest, decent americans, but that is IMO not enough and no conpiracy forum nor Alex Jones will change that fact...
edit on 11-9-2010 by 6205LH because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NightGypsy
reply to post by pteridine
No thanks, pteridine, this game you guys play has long since worn out it's welcome. You know exactly what the evidence is because you magically appear as soon as one of one of these 9/11 threads goes up. What I find amusing is that you and your buddies like Dereks like to focus on the more fringe theories rather than answer to the evidence that, despite your protests, is clearly damning. But it's all a pointless argument to have with you anyway because no matter how good any current or future evidence might be, you'll make some silly argument against it. That's your job, after all. So tell me why any of us should even waist a moment of time playing "Ring Around the Rosie" with you on this issue?
Originally posted by impressme
reply to post by okbmd
There you go , now everyone here can see that you aren't really after the truth when you tell another truther not to worry about posting false information . I hope everyone here visits that thread and sees you for what you are .
No, they see you for what you are
Anyone reading this nonsense can clearly see you have “taken my statement out of contexts,” just as I suspected. OS debunkers resorting to stoop as low as they need to in order to try and discredit their opponent. Twisting my quote into something else is what many of you OS believers do. The casual ATS readers will have no problem in seeing what you are doing.
Originally posted by The Baby Seal Club
reply to post by dereks
So dereks,
You wouldn't mind signing a petition calling for a new investigation right? After all, an impartial investigation would just prove your point.
So what do you say dereks? Will you sign on for a new investigation? And if not, then why not? What do you fear?
Originally posted by pteridine
Originally posted by impressme
reply to post by okbmd
There you go , now everyone here can see that you aren't really after the truth when you tell another truther not to worry about posting false information . I hope everyone here visits that thread and sees you for what you are .
No, they see you for what you are
Anyone reading this nonsense can clearly see you have “taken my statement out of contexts,” just as I suspected. OS debunkers resorting to stoop as low as they need to in order to try and discredit their opponent. Twisting my quote into something else is what many of you OS believers do. The casual ATS readers will have no problem in seeing what you are doing.
I see exactly what he is doing. He is proving you wrong. The nonsense I read was your statement in the thread okbmd referenced.
Originally posted by Seventh
reply to post by pteridine
In reply to your questions regarding what aspects would you like to see re-investigated, well some of the blatantly obvious ones would now be impossible (forensics on steel for explosives residue etc), so my short list would be..
1). The B.B.C`s report stating WTC7 had collapsed 22 minutes before it did, who gave permission for this report to go live, and whom was the source of this report.
2). An explanation from Bush regarding his recollection of watching the 1st impact, on a T.V in a place where there was no T.V and never has been.
3). Independent video experts to analyse the many films available that are open to scrutiny (including those allegedly showing Bin Laden).
4). The release of all the 83 CCTV recordings from their respective sites around the Pentagon.
5). The many related documents that have been requested via the FOIA that have yet to be released, including the one depicting what Bush was watching via satellite in his presidential limousine.
6). John Gross to take oath and ask why he denied traces of molten metal.
7). A new commission with all the testimonies from the 503 first responders that the N.Y. Times had interviewed resulting in over 20,000 pages of evidence, also the many eye witnesses whom stated events that did not comply with the OS aspects.
8). A thorough investigation of the suspicious stock market movements, including John McCain’s wife - Cindy Hensley McCain whose tax returns from that year clearly show a vast profit made from put options.
9). A thorough investigation of why John O'Neill`s requests regarding Bin Laden and Al Qeada were ignored, resulting in him being told to back off.
10). Who authorised the release of all members of the bin Laden family who were residing at the time in the US. even though all flights were cancelled and Bin Laden was the prime suspect for 9/11.
That will do for now.