Scientists, Military Officers, and Actors are among new 9/11 research organizations, page 16

privacy

Pages: << 13 14 15 16 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 121 times

reply posted on 16-9-2010 @ 02:49 PM by bsbray11

Originally posted by pteridine
Keep dancing. There was no liquid steel proved by your reference. The erosion was not due to steel melting as you claimed, it was due to hot corrosion.

Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intragranular melting

The eutectic temperature for this mixture strongly suggests that the temperatures in this region of the steel beam approached 1,000 °C (1,800 °F), which is substantially lower than would be expected for melting this steel.

www.fema.gov...

reply posted on 16-9-2010 @ 04:46 PM by pteridine

reply to post by bsbray11

So, as the temps were lower than the melting point, hot corrosion was the mechanism that eroded the steel. The only liquid phase was a slag-like material that only formed at the surface of the metal.

reply posted on 16-9-2010 @ 06:47 PM by Wolfenz

reply posted on 19-9-2010 @ 07:31 PM by eliade

reply to post by The Baby Seal Club

"When the debunkers show up I would just like them to address the one question of why they are against a new and independent investigation. "

The 9/11 attacks have already been investigated. You don't like the result, too bad. There are
more important things going on in the world than pandering to the whims of an angry internet mob
of conspiracy theorists. The only thing that's needed now is some Jim Jones figure around
whom you can all congregate. Oh sweet kool aid

reply posted on 19-9-2010 @ 07:47 PM by _BoneZ_

Originally posted by eliade
The 9/11 attacks have already been investigated.

No they haven't. Guesses, theories, and computer calculations isn't an investigation. Further, NIST even states at the beginning of their report that their findings can't be taken as factual. It's a conspiracy theory any way you look at it.

Originally posted by eliade
There are more important things going on in the world than pandering to the whims of an angry internet mob of conspiracy theorists.

That "angry mob of conspiracy theorists" includes many of our hero first responders, hundreds of victims' families, and survivors of the attacks. That "angry mob of conspiracy theorists" also includes many scientists, engineers, architects, and respected Ph.D's from around the world.

So, the next time you wanna call a group of people an "angry mob of conspiracy theorists", you should actually look at who's in that "angry mob".

reply posted on 21-9-2010 @ 05:51 PM by Ciphor

reply to post by bsbray11

But just because they said it melted doesn't mean it melted. They meant it on a astrophysics level and if you study this on the quantum level you will realize how they did not mean melting by melting they meant it melted. Geeze bsbray. Get with the new age. This isn't 1489 when melting actually meant melting. I'm not cold because I'm cool.