It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Scientists, Military Officers, and Actors are among new 9/11 research organizations

page: 16
121
<< 13  14  15   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 16 2010 @ 02:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by pteridine
Keep dancing. There was no liquid steel proved by your reference. The erosion was not due to steel melting as you claimed, it was due to hot corrosion.





Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intragranular melting



The eutectic temperature for this mixture strongly suggests that the temperatures in this region of the steel beam approached 1,000 °C (1,800 °F), which is substantially lower than would be expected for melting this steel.


www.fema.gov...




posted on Sep, 16 2010 @ 04:46 PM
link   
reply to post by bsbray11
 


So, as the temps were lower than the melting point, hot corrosion was the mechanism that eroded the steel. The only liquid phase was a slag-like material that only formed at the surface of the metal.



posted on Sep, 16 2010 @ 06:47 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Sep, 19 2010 @ 07:31 PM
link   
reply to post by The Baby Seal Club
 


"When the debunkers show up I would just like them to address the one question of why they are against a new and independent investigation. "

The 9/11 attacks have already been investigated. You don't like the result, too bad. There are
more important things going on in the world than pandering to the whims of an angry internet mob
of conspiracy theorists. The only thing that's needed now is some Jim Jones figure around
whom you can all congregate. Oh sweet kool aid



posted on Sep, 19 2010 @ 07:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by eliade
The 9/11 attacks have already been investigated.

No they haven't. Guesses, theories, and computer calculations isn't an investigation. Further, NIST even states at the beginning of their report that their findings can't be taken as factual. It's a conspiracy theory any way you look at it.



Originally posted by eliade
There are more important things going on in the world than pandering to the whims of an angry internet mob of conspiracy theorists.

That "angry mob of conspiracy theorists" includes many of our hero first responders, hundreds of victims' families, and survivors of the attacks. That "angry mob of conspiracy theorists" also includes many scientists, engineers, architects, and respected Ph.D's from around the world.

So, the next time you wanna call a group of people an "angry mob of conspiracy theorists", you should actually look at who's in that "angry mob".



posted on Sep, 21 2010 @ 05:51 PM
link   
reply to post by bsbray11
 


But just because they said it melted doesn't mean it melted. They meant it on a astrophysics level and if you study this on the quantum level you will realize how they did not mean melting by melting they meant it melted. Geeze bsbray. Get with the new age. This isn't 1489 when melting actually meant melting. I'm not cold because I'm cool.



new topics

top topics
 
121
<< 13  14  15   >>

log in

join