meat = shorter life, page 23
Pages: <<  20    21    22    23    24  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 22 times


reply posted on 5-10-2010 @ 05:23 PM by fonenyc
reply to post by goodsamaritan55



Well if all plant life is ever you know, like non existant on earth due to some GMO induced famine or locusts and what not, eating vegans will make a nice plate so yeah they have a point lol keep the cycle going


reply posted on 5-10-2010 @ 06:01 PM by mnm.carper
Originally posted by Son of Will
reply to
post by Ong Bak



Yeah, you're referring to The China Study. It's one of the most underrated, and underreported stories of the 20th century. I've read the book several times now, and all the critical reviews - I can definitely say that it is 100% legitimate!

I urge everybody to try going 1 month without eating any meat or dairy. (...)


Alright, I will. Starting tomorrow. You make a good case, so, why not?


reply posted on 7-10-2010 @ 06:30 PM by SinkingSun
reply to post by Ong Bak



It is possible for people to handle such a diet nowadays, even if it is a very small number of them. There are ways of restoring your system to a state which will allow for digestion of raw meats and even handle all of the parasites and bacteria that may come along with your raw foods. Some people are just lucky, though.


reply posted on 8-10-2010 @ 07:05 PM by Ong Bak
Originally posted by SinkingSun
reply to
post by Ong Bak



It is possible for people to handle such a diet nowadays, even if it is a very small number of them. There are ways of restoring your system to a state which will allow for digestion of raw meats and even handle all of the parasites and bacteria that may come along with your raw foods. Some people are just lucky, though.

prove this please. lets see a link about people immune to parasties and foodborne illness.
utter rubbish, dont make things up please can be dangerous to others.


reply posted on 18-3-2012 @ 05:07 PM by Son of Will
Originally posted by DevolutionEvolvd
reply to
post by Son of Will



www.youtube.com...

In the above video, at 19 minutes and 17 seconds he begins to reveal his true intentions. It is fraud, but it's not legally punishable...because it's very simple to produce and interpret data (especially when you're the one producing AND interpreting it) from observational data to support any hypothesis. Selection bias, or perversion of data, is not good science.


Fraud, but not legally punishable? That's an utterly absurd statement from any way you look at it. He has not shown any biased data here.


For instance, there were some small associations between animal products and disease; however, Campbell fails to mention, evidently intentionally, that there were associations between plant proteins and cancer (which he admits to later...in the video above) and extremely strong associations between wheat consumption and heart disease/myocardial infarction....et al.

This entire paragraph is bogus. There were large associations between meat and disease, inverse associations between plant proteins and disease, with small associations between wheat and disease. Since this is exactly what naysayers have said in the past, I'm assuming you just did a copy&paste of someone else's claims. That's sloppy.


As Imagniary-dude already pointed out, this study is nothing more than a book of numbers or "correlations". Not only is it extremely difficult to interpret (unless you're unbiased and good with statistics/numbers), it's extremely unreliable in providing conclusive evidence of disease causality.


Imaginary-dude pointed that out? Actually, I did when I brought it up in the first place. Even though you're wildly exaggerating the difficulty of extracting meaningful data from correlation studies, yes, it does pose a difficulty.


The China Project is either blindly accepted (usually by Campbell's colleagues at PCRM), due to the time consumption/difficulty in which it takes to review/interpret, or it is generally ignored because of how unreliable such studies are.


Vegans don't blindly accept anything - many of us started out as meat eaters, but changed our ways when confronted with scientific data. On the other hand... this thread is a good example of how the naysayers, like yourself, blindly accept the word of online bloggers over peer-reviewed scientific studies, presumably to defend a lifestyle you feel is being threatened.
Pages: <<  20    21    22    23    24  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Church of HIV: Inventing the AIDS Virus
  Posted 7 days ago with 64 member flags
DIY lets cure cancer simple as that
  Posted 2 days ago with 19 member flags
Why are dead people waking up around the world?
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
Dying For A Smile
  Posted 14 days ago with 11 member flags
Harvard To Be Tried for Alzheimer\'s Research Fraud
  Posted 6 days ago with 10 member flags
Man loses penis to flesh eating bacteria
  Posted 5 days ago with 9 member flags