posted on Sep, 8 2010 @ 07:19 AM
I sense that some people accept the idea that has been pushed by the powers that be since the 70's that the Earth is in danger from overpopulation,
so they put evidence of covert soft-kill depopulation techniques to the back of their mind and acquiesce to them. I think this amounts to "drinking
The publicity about overpopulation in the 70's started with the publication of the Illuminati Club of Rome's The Limits to Growth
, which was
about a study that was commissioned by the Club. In my opinion, this study should not be considered trustworthy. I believe we should not rely on any
information that comes from Illuminati-controlled studies, universities, or pundits.
Regarding soft-kill depopulation techniques, I have found a blog post by former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Catherine Austin Fitts that
I think focuses like a laser on the face of evil that we're looking at. She wrote it about a year ago and it references the swine flu vaccination.
The title is "Swine Flu: What I Believe."
In this article, Catherine describes how she arrived at a conclusion in her mind that the powers that be have a plan of world depopulation and that
the swine flu vaccination was a way to carry out that plan.
She begins by remembering 1991:
These days, I keep remembering my sense of urgency leaving the Bush Administration in 1991. We had to do
something to turn around the economy and gather real assets behind retirement plans and the social safety net. . . .
As my efforts to find ways of reengineering government investment in communities failed to win political support, Washington and Wall Street moved
forward with a debt bubble and globalization that was horrifying in its implications for humanity.
She goes on to relate how she analyzed what she saw happening with the government/Wall Street and calculations she did as a result of what she was
Overwhelmed by what was happening, I estimated the end result. My simple calculations guessed that we were going to achieve economic
sustainability on Earth by depopulating down to a population of approximately 500 million people from our then current global population of 6 billion.
I was a portfolio strategist used to looking at numbers from a very high level. Those around me could not fathom how all the different threads I was
integrating could lead to such a conclusion. To me, we had to have radical change in how we governed resources or depopulate. It was a mathematical
She then states that an associate of hers had come to the same conclusion she had.
I submit that what we should be doing is
- Finding ways to glean reliable information about the world's resources to population ratio.
- Release suppressed technology so that we can deal with whatever true issues regarding population/resources we may have.
However, I think before we can even do that we'll have to free ourselves from the global debt slavery we're stuck in by taking over control of the