Is the following article from American Free Press accurate? If so, it may go along way towards explaining extreme corruption in the Judicial system.
And as if that wasn't enough, with the story we also have a murdered attorney mystery, and a lawsuit naming multiple defendants in the Department of
Justice, including Judge Anna J. Brown.
The article describes how, according to federal statutes, it is perfectly acceptable to award virtually any government employee or other person CASH
AWARDS, IN SECRET, as high as $ 5,000 or more. And the kicker is that there doesn't appear to be much limitation to this, if at all. If true, this
creates a serious incentive for convictions, and could also explain why our prisons are over capacity like whoa.
In fact, if this is true, it may explain a whole lot more than that. For instance, remember the $ 2.3 Trillion Rumsfeld said was missing on September
10, 2001? (and which is still unaccounted for...?) What if it's all gone paying out huge amounts of bonuses in secret like this, and protected by
statute? Do the statutes specify what fund this is to come from, so they can be tracked? ARE they being tracked?
This may turn out to be the root of all evil in America, I swear!
So let's see what we can turn up to either prove this or disprove it!
First, read the article
, which is written well.
Federal statutes show how and why U.S. law encourages prosecutorial and judicial conflicts of interest, non-neutrality, non-impartiality and
corruption of justice in the federal courts. (See page 13 for portions of 5 USC 4502 through 4504 from the United States Code.)
It would be helpful to read that part of the USC. Star for anyone who wants to dig that up!
“The awards may be given to the same person or group, each minute, each hour, every day, every week, every month, every year or not at all. In
other words, the U.S. government and the alleged Internal Revenue Service . . . have a perfectly legal (not lawful) system of bribery. The bribery
works against the American people . . . when they expect impartial justice, and there is no proof on the record to the contrary.”
Legal Bribery! Yeah, that would explain a lot of things. For sure. And it would explain a lot of dubious legal cases as well. See article for
Defendant Roy Bendshadler’s attorney Nancy Bergeson had complained of suspected “jury tampering” and was found strangled to death in her
Portland home the next day. Her cause of death was at first passed off as “natural causes” until a second medical examiner changed it to homicide.
The murder is unsolved.
Yeah, there's another point: "We are willing to pay you $ 5,000 to keep your mouth shut and push for conviction, Mr. Juror. And if we get it, we
will pay you an additional $ 5,000 or more!"
Stack the jury with 12 of those, and your boy is going down. No question. Oh, it's a high profile case? Well well, no problem, we can pay $ 5K every
day for a year.
I had always heard the phrase "Money Talks."
I might rethink that. THIS money is SILENT- but deadly.