It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
When is the threshold crossed where cops have a right to come onto your property and give you orders?
more than likely the idiot was so intent on saving his snakes that he wouldn't follow their orders
police know its a dangerous job, the idiot they tased apparently wasn't smart enough to know that fire is bad.
i honestly fail to see how they are remotely the same.
Originally posted by xxcalbier
ok to every one who thinks they should have let this guy alone to do what he was trying to do call your fire department and tell them to NEVER come over your house if there's a fire that you want your freedom to burn with it .
The guy was over emotional and he needed a calm head to step in simple and to the point.
as for not just grabbing the guy you would all be yelling police brutality .
like it or not being tazed is a lot less likly to cause permanent damage then being drug away kiking and screaming.
the guy was worryed about the snakes ? when he has a wife and kids and more on the way?
sure let him burn then you can all yell about how she now needs state help to feed the kids and how much of a louser she is.
you people need to find issues with every thing.
You would probly cural up in a ball if you couldnt find something to say was bad alest once a day.
Originally posted by Jenna
If they'd done nothing and the guy had died in the fire, the city, the police department, and the fire department would likely all be facing lawsuits for not stopping him. Seems to me their choice was get sued for letting him kill himself or get sued for stopping him. Rock and a hard place if you ask me.
That could be anyone you happen to see crossing the street, or driving down the highway. You don't know what might happen. So should the cops taze everyone getting in a car, to preemptively save their lives?
Originally posted by trollz
I'm actually moreso in support of the police on this one... The guy's life is more valuable than whatever possessions he may have. If they'd let him endanger himself, it'd essentially be like watching someone potentially commit suicide.
Originally posted by Soshh
reply to post by SaturnFX
I don't agree with the use of the taser, but then again I wasn't there. They tried three times to stop him. He could have been violent or threatening towards them, he could have been built like a brick lavatory and the taser was the safest way to subdue him for all concerned.
I don't think we should automatically assume that the officers were being unreasonable.
Originally posted by xxcalbier
just grabbing the guy you would all be yelling police brutality .
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by Ironclad
If it's "their job" tp taze people trying to save their pets and that's a perfectly acceptable excuse why isnt it "their job" to clean up charred corpses? They signed up for it. You can't be a firefighter, cop or paramedic and not expect see guts smeared on the street or smoldering neighbors under wet rubble.
Not a viable excuse and certainly doesnt trump personal liberty.
Originally posted by soleprobe
Originally posted by xxcalbier
just grabbing the guy you would all be yelling police brutality .
Torture by electrocution with 50,000 volts is also police brutality
..........................................................................................