It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BBC Correspondent says MOSSAD did 9/11 and Iran doesn't want Nukes

page: 2
121
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:
+9 more 
posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 04:09 PM
link   
reply to post by hooper
 


Noting about this thread is anti-semitic.

Don't try and derail this thread in that direction. There are many unanswered questions relating to 9/11 and there are many questions relating to a possible Mossad connection as well.




posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 04:16 PM
link   
reply to post by LarryLove
 


No, there are not. There is a lot of baseless innuendo deeply rooted in anti-semitism, but no legitimate questions.

Pointing out the obvious anti-semitism in the OP is NOT derailing the thread.



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 04:18 PM
link   
reply to post by franspeakfree
 


Oh Yes the "Dancing Jews"!

Bugaboo of the Jew haters......


The 5 jews were spotted in WeeHawken filming the WTC after it was hit

For those of you not in NJ - Weehawken (Or much of it) is on a ridge with
clear view of NYC. If you want to see what is happening on west side of Manhattan, Weehawken is where you want to be

Now their activities attrached attenion - bunch of guys filming WTC and jumping around looked suspicious

Were arrested and detained in East Rutherford, which is about 4 miles west

FBI began to interrogate these people to determine who they were and what were doing. Spent next 3 months giving them 3rd degree. Concluded that had nothing to do with 9/11, yet probably were involved with Mossad.

Had bigger fish to fry - rather than waste resources on couple of low level
operatives simply gave them the boot. Their cover was blown and usefulnewss to Mossad was zero



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 04:24 PM
link   
Just because Alan Hart used to work for the BBC does not – and should not – give him credibility.

He is just one of many presenting their view and in so doing, busily trying to get their books sold and their profile raised. This is just another edited-around the-commentary video. If you like what you hear you can buy his book and even donate him a few quid on his website. Form an orderly queue.

Alan Hart is also a well known Zionist conspiracy peddler, so 9/11 et al fits into his paranoid world view. His website is a continuous diatribe of the same old “Zionists run the US and bhah, bhah, blah”.

I think it is often useful to understand the motive of the person peddling the conspiracy to understand the conspiracy.

Regards



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 05:33 PM
link   
reply to post by paraphi
 


So the fact that journalist has worked for a reputable media source doesn't add to their credibility? It does for me. The content of the author is what should be most scrutinized, but employment through a credible and established source helps as well.

Regardless, this isn't about the source - It's about the information. There are countless other sources of similar/same information linking Israelis with 9/11. Here are a couple:



... and ...


(above is part 1 of 4 - a good listen)

... and ...



... and many, many more here.


[edit on 7-9-2010 by misinformational]



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 06:09 PM
link   
reply to post by misinformational
 


Well, I suppose it depends on why he left and whether he was any good. If he was, then perhaps his tenure at the BBC would have been longer and he would not be asking for donations on his website.

... and all these videos are an echo of each other with the odd new "source" thrown in. Nothing concrete, all based on quoting each other and all feeding an audience who seem to have lost the capability to actually question what they are seeing.

Regards



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 06:20 PM
link   
reply to post by paraphi
 


Irrespective of Alan Hart's views, he has had a pretty interesting journalistic life.

He is making some pretty direct accusations against Mossad, but then his experiences with Israeli leaders of the past my have led to this.



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 06:21 PM
link   
reply to post by thedman
 


This does not necessarily mean that Mossad carried out the attacks. They could very well have been tailing the hijackers, as Neil Mackay surmises. Still very bad, since they did not notify American authorities, but not quite as bad as actually carrying out the attacks.




Five Israelis Were Seen Filming as Jet Liners Plowed Into the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001
Were they part of a massive spy ring which shadowed the 9/11 hijackers and knew that al-Qaeda planned a devastating terrorist attack on the USA?

www.commondreams.org...



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 06:31 PM
link   
reply to post by paraphi
 


I will give him a lot more credibility than most because of his background. He has had access to world leaders' doors during his career and who knows what this guy has been told. We all form our conspiracy theories though access to alternative information and Hart has done the same, yet through sources we could only dream of having.



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 06:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Faiol
ATS should ban these people that do false accusations,


So you want the OP banned, claiming jews did 911 then!

Let us look at the author of the video, it appears he really does not like jews and Israel!
en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 06:51 PM
link   
reply to post by dereks
 


At least Hart seems to share the views of many ATS members who believe in a Zionist conspiracy.



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 07:04 PM
link   


Ok the links aside the author makes some far fetched claims like remote controlled airlines hitting twin towers which are quiet hard to digest for me personally.

Well you should research operation northwoods. Because that idea came from 1962. That technology is outdated now, if we went highly technical it would be much more advanced than that.



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 07:27 PM
link   
Thanks for posting --always good to see that not everyone believes the officail version of 9/11.
And that those in the know are still trying to inform the rest of us as great peril to themselves. very brave!


+7 more 
posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 07:29 PM
link   
I find it ironic that hooper and friends use the "anti-semite" counter argument against this video.....the very stance Hart mentions in the video...the very same position he experiences when he discusses with people his belief that Israel is implicated...

Nice work hooper, using the old, worn out lame excuse...anyone who speaks ill of Israel is Anti semitic....very naive and very predictable...Hart predicts hoopers response on the op's video...nice confirmation hooper!!!!

There's no anti semitism on show here...anti ZIONISM , but not anti semitism....and whats wrong with anti zionism??

I, for one, clearly subscribe to this view...

Alan Hart is highly credentialed...

He has worked most of his life in the Middle East.

He was the former Middle East Chief Correspondent for Independent Television News, one of Britains major TV stations.

He was Panorama's Middle East Correspondent.

Panorama is the longest-running current affairs documentary series in the world, specialising in investigative journalism...

When such a senior pedigreed journalist comes forward with explosive accusations regarding 9/11, to his detriment, I believe he deserves to be heard...if only other members of the Fourth Estate would do likewise..

All these straws will eventually break the camels back.

Hooper knows this....dont you mate??




posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 07:58 PM
link   
reply to post by franspeakfree
 


Also, Sharon was scheduled to be in New York that day but
cancelled. Silverstein did not breakfast at the towers and told his son
not to go to work.



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 08:04 PM
link   
I'm skeptical of this guy. He sounds like he blames Israel for things, before the facts are in.

He was wrong in the past about Alan Johnston, when he tried to blame Israel:

littlegreenfootballs.com...

That doesn't mean he's going to be wrong every time of course, but it makes me more cautious.

I watched the video, and he had no new or compelling evidence to add, he just trotted out a bunch of the usual stuff, nothing new there to convince 9/11 conspiracy skeptics. All we get is some argument from authority type stuff because he used to be a journalist for some respected organizations. That alone doesn't cut it, the evidence is what counts.

The closest to something new was his claim that the worlds foremost demolition firm told him it was definitely controlled demo, but of course he's not naming them, or giving us any other details, so for all we know he could just be making it up.

[edit on 7/9/2010 by harpsounds]



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 08:04 PM
link   
reply to post by thedman
 


Why were these terrorists not imprisoned and given a trial
by jury? More allegiance to Israel as in the USSLIBERTY?
More sacrifices in the name of going to war?



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 08:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by FeastofTrumpets
Why were these terrorists not imprisoned and given a trial
by jury?


Simple really. They were not terrorists, and had nothing at all to do with it. So why should they be imprisoned?



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 08:12 PM
link   
reply to post by franspeakfree
 


Im sorry...I thought you were going to list some facts. Instead, I find you have listed internet rumors and falsehoods.......



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 08:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Prince Of Darkness
 



Ok the links aside the author makes some far fetched claims like remote controlled airlines hitting twin towers which are quiet hard to digest for me personally. Aside that let the discussion start.

Dov Zakheim is a dual-citizen, Zionist, PNAC-member and co-author of “Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century"

This Whitepaper aims for the U.S. to enter and “win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars.” The military is tasked to take control of the Gulf region “whether or not Saddam Hussein is in power”, because the “need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein." It also proposes to increase military spending, because overall, it wants the US to be “Tomorrow's dominant force”. Here is the most famous quote from the Whitepaper:


Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.

www.newamericancentury.org...

Zakheim worked from 1987-2001 as CEO for SPC international. SPC international is a subsidiary of System Planning Corporation. One of the products this corporation sells is the Command Transmitter System, a highly customable remote control system for planes, boats, missiles and other vehicles.
www.sysplan.com...
100777.com...

During the Bush-administration Zakheim worked as comptroller and was tasked to track down the Pentagon's $ 2.3 trillion worth of unaccounted transactions. Perhaps it is coincidence, but when the Pentagon was hit, 35 budget-analysts and accountants which worked on just this case were killed.


I want to add, that many of the Zionistic PNAC-members are actively using the revolving door between defence contractors and administrative positions within the government to enrich themselves.



new topics

top topics



 
121
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join