It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama Birth Certificate; 'Document allegedly obtained in Kenya sent to every member of Congress'

page: 25
104
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 06:01 AM
link   
reply to post by Arbitrageur
 


Cause california short forms are really short.


103555. A short form of certification of birth registration that
shall contain only identification information may be issued by the
State Registrar, by the county recorder, or by any local registrar.


Source: info.sen.ca.gov...

Doesnt even contain parents names, and afaik the Passport guys want to know those.

Edit to add: oops. does contain the name of parents.
Found a pic of one.
www.policemag.com...

So, i really can't tell you why they would not accept these. Looks complete enough for me for a passport. It only says "county of birth" and doesnt show the city, thats the only reason I could think of.


edit on 11-9-2010 by debunky because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 08:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by cindyremains
 


I think that you are missing the point. We are all skeptics on ATS and we want solid proof of the validity of his BC. It's clear that Hawaii has sealed his BC.(refer to link on last post)
Obama wants control over what can be disclosed. (refer to previous link on EO-13489)

Why go through all these steps to keep his long form BC secret? Why not give us a look-see? Put the whole thing to rest.



What exactly is the "whole thing" you wish to put to rest? His birth place? His parents? What? And then, what would you do with the information?



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 08:40 AM
link   
i don't care where he was born.

so what if he wasn't even born on earth. suppose he was born on the moon. americans put there flag there first, not a flag for earth.

americans act like they own the planet, military installations in well over a hundred nations. how many military installations from other nations are in america? who am i to disagree with america? fine, the planet is yours. congradulations, you win. so it doesn't matter where the american president was born. period. if we believe american ideologies.

you americans do not always make a lot of sense to others. just saying.

i refuse to flag this thread.

-et



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 09:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by DABIGRAGU
In keeping with the thread topic looks as if the "non-existent" doctor has been found.


Where did someone claim that this Dr. didn't exist?


Originally posted by jibeho
Ever wonder why we have never seen any pictures of newborn baby Obama? In the hospital? With Mom and Dad? With Grams and Gramps? No cute, cuddly baby pictures that would have been a perfect addition to his autobiography and campaign site.


I was born just a few short years before Obama was born and I have NO such pictures of myself! NONE. They don't exist. The youngest picture I have of myself is when I was about 6 months old. Does this raise questions of my origination? My place of birth? This is the kind of squishy logic that is being used to PLANT questions and doubts in people's minds. Very effective, I might add, for people who aren't willing to THINK for themselves. I have NO pictures of my grandparents and none of my parents when I was a baby.

The absence of these pictures means absolutely NOTHING. Except in the minds of "those who want to believe".


Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I stand corrected. But that doesn't answer my original question about why they are requiring the long form if the short form is supposed to be just as good as some people claim.


Just because you don't have the answer doesn't mean you can make one up.
Do the research. Find out WHY CA requires the long form for people born in CA... There's probably a perfectly logical explanation, having nothing to do with the idea that the long one is somehow "more accurate', especially since all the info on the short form comes DIRECTLY from the long form.

Don't make up answers to the manufactured questions. That's what birthers do and I don't think you're a birther.



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 09:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Do the research. Find out WHY CA requires the long form for people born in CA...


And here's the answer:

Source



California law allowed for the issuance of abstracts for a period. Due to the increase of fraud, outside agencies became stricter in the forms of vital records they would accept, so State law was changed so abstracts are no longer issued.


This is California, remember. A state that has HIGH incidents of illegal immigration. False CA abstracts are much easier to fake than long forms... THINK...

When you have a question, look for proof that you're WRONG. That's the best way to prove your point.



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 01:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by aero56

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by cindyremains
 


I think that you are missing the point. We are all skeptics on ATS and we want solid proof of the validity of his BC. It's clear that Hawaii has sealed his BC.(refer to link on last post)
Obama wants control over what can be disclosed. (refer to previous link on EO-13489)

Why go through all these steps to keep his long form BC secret? Why not give us a look-see? Put the whole thing to rest.



What exactly is the "whole thing" you wish to put to rest? His birth place? His parents? What? And then, what would you do with the information?


Well, ignore it, of course. And deny it.



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 02:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
Obama wants control over what can be disclosed.


As I read this quote again, the absurdity struck out at me...

EVERYBODY wants control over what can be disclosed regarding their personal information. Everybody HAS control over what can be disclosed regarding their personal information. So, Obama wants what everyone else wants and HAS, yet somehow, he's a villain for that... It's CRAZINESS. Absolute insanity!



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 02:47 PM
link   
www.morningliberty.com... ama/

Here is the truth.



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 02:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Eire2
 





Tom Fife in the American Free Press was in Moscow in 1992 where a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences stated they had trained a Barack Obama as a communist and atheist and he will make easier the triumph of communism over the USA.


When exactly did Obama study in Russia?



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 02:57 PM
link   
reply to post by InvisibleAlbatross
 


Do you think there's only one Barack Obama in the world?



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 03:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


Probably not, but since this article is implying that the Obama "taught to be a communist and atheist"
is now the president, I would like the poster to provide proof of him having studied in Russia.



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 04:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by Eire2
 





Tom Fife in the American Free Press was in Moscow in 1992 where a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences stated they had trained a Barack Obama as a communist and atheist and he will make easier the triumph of communism over the USA.


When exactly did Obama study in Russia?


I can sort of believe it. Anybody remember this article?

www.americantownmeeting.com...



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 06:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by Eire2
Here is the truth.


Please show exactly where Obama spent $2million dollars..... If you cannot then we know it is just another lie from you!



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 06:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by dereks

Originally posted by Eire2
Here is the truth.


Please show exactly where Obama spent $2million dollars..... If you cannot then we know it is just another lie from you!




Who cares if he spent 2 million or 2 dollars? Why would he hide the information in the first place? He is the president of the United States should we not have all the details of his past?


edit on 11-9-2010 by Subjective Truth because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 06:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by Subjective Truth
Why would he hide the information in the first place?


Hide from whom? Birthers have the highhorse mentality to think the president is hiding something from them specifically, as if he is paying attention? His eligibility has satisfied the vast majority of us, so why should he have to 'hide' anything more? There is a difference between not caring about something and 'hiding' something.



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 06:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Subjective Truth
He is the president of the United States should we not have all the details of his past?


We don't have all the details of ANY president's past. Why should we have THIS one???



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 06:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic

Originally posted by Subjective Truth
He is the president of the United States should we not have all the details of his past?


We don't have all the details of ANY president's past. Why should we have THIS one???




I think we should have all of the info from every president. I hope that clears it up.




When you rise to a position with this much power I believe your past should be factored in. If this was Bush I would be saying the same exact thing. I dont like either party I think they are one in the same. All I want is information.



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 06:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Subjective Truth
 


You think presidents should give up their right to privacy when they become leaders?



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 09:18 PM
link   
Some people will never learn:


The Independent also quotes Jon Chessoni, a first secretary at the Kenyan embassy in Washington, as calling the claims madness. “His father, in 1961, would not even have been in Kenya,” he said.



A British professor in African history points out the term “Coast Province” could not have been used in early 1964, Dan Branch, of the University of Warwick, said at that time, Kenyan provinces were referred to as “regions.”


And you must wonder why if Lucas is so honest about the authenticity of this Kenyan birth certificate as to why he so reluctant to get it reviewed by Kenyan officials?


Immigration minister Otieno Kajwang’ dismissed the documents thus: “If we get those individuals, they will be jailed for forging government documents.”

www.nation.co.ke...

The source is from a major Kenyan newspaper, mind you though it was posted a year ago but it still is significant to this current birth certificate. But sure, we can argue that the folks at this newspaper are 'in on it', we can lump the entire Hawaiian government in on it. How about we just argue that everybody aside from birthers are in on the conspiracy, because this conspiracy requires such a level of involvement over such a long time period its not even funny. But birthers are willing to believe anything. They will believe mysterious men and women behind computer screens who have no credentials to show for, they will believe a mysterious modified article from the AP original, they will believe a random person with a random unauthenticated supposed Kenyan birth certificate, they will believe an unauthenticated audio tape that does not even admit to the claim. They refuse to believe the Hawaiian government, or Kenyan officials stating on the official record or even Republican politicians. They will lump Hillary and McCain in on the conspiracy to suit their views. As for the notion that the long form will put it all to rest? Birthers fail to explain to us how the long form will put the conspiracy to rest. Only that they want the president to listen to them and have him stop the world to cater to them. They have this highhorse mentality of theirs that the world must stop because they are unsatisfied. They just refuse to accept the constitutional process when it does not suit their agenda.

Thank goodness they have not gotten their way. 67 birther lawsuits later and nothing of it, aside from the $20000 fine slapped on Orly. Keep it up.



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 09:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by Subjective Truth
 


You think presidents should give up their right to privacy when they become leaders?




This is information anyone would have to give to get a job RIGHT? Is the president not employed by the people of the United States? WAKE UP




And this goes for any President not just the current one.


edit on 11-9-2010 by Subjective Truth because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
104
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join