It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by slugger9787
Thirty million bicycles, school, employed teachers, and eventually taxpayers to pay for health care.
Why do you think that aborted children would pay more to the system than they would take? Given that they were aborted, their parents clearly thought that they would be unable (or unwanting) to take care of them properly. Therefore its more likely that there would be more asocials and unsuccessfull people among them than population average. So i the end, they would likely take more from the health care and social benefits system than would they pay into.
Pro-Life or Pro-Choice?
Originally posted by redoubt
reply to post by bluemirage5
I have no time for anti-abortionists.
And they have no time for you. That's why neither hard-headed, extremist mob will ever find a way to solve the problem. I'm right, you're wrong and I just don't have time for you.
Euthanasia is just down the road. Death Panels who will judge like God the ones whose "quality of life" as if it is up to them to decide! Even with those who have family who want to take care of their aging relatives will not be given a choice . These people already see themselves as gods.