It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by airspoon
I noticed that the "new formula" for WATS doesn't seem to be based heavily on thread starters at all, as apparently high flag numbers no longer matter, at least as much as before.
--airspoonedit on 27-10-2010 by airspoon because: I'll keep that comment to myself for now
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Threads with 01-10 flags = . 25 points
Threads with 11-20 flags = .50 points
Threads with 21-30 flags = 1 points
Threads with 31-40 flags = 2 points
Threads with 41-50 flags = 5 points
Threads with 51-100 flags = 10 points
Threads with 101-200 flags = 25 points
Threads with 200 plus flags = 50 points
Originally posted by We the People
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
i checked in the hall of fame, all time top members and you are in second place, congratulation PT, wow what a spectacular parcours, you've only been here since 2 years, i guess your devotion paid off !
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
New feature added into the recent posts page: "ATS History."
This provides members with a drop-down selection of years and months to go back and review the top-800 threads (by replies, flags, or last-reply) for any given month in the history of ATS.
page? Pretty please?
Originally posted by teapot
Ok, so a banned member with one post that was removed as 'off topic', no stars, flags or w's, has 20 k's? How does the weighting work? Are k scores randomly generated?
Originally posted by LadySkadi
WATS index number is showing up differently in places. It doesn't appear that the revised WATS index numbers transferred to the settings on the personal profile page. Example: my index shows 50 in threads but 21 (which it was prior to the revision) in my profile.
only the most materialistic persons care so much anyway about money, points an