It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'm not questioning your credentials here, but if you were a professional, you wouldn't be here fervently defending a point that you cannot yet prove yourself. Anyone professional in our industry would know that it is prudent that one accepts all possibilities in the likelihood that unknowns can occur at any given time.
It is very possible that the spurs (exloded debris) were caused by purposefully placed explosive devices. It is also perfectly plausible that the spurs were generated by compressed air. Let us not forget that the draw of air within the building would also have reached enormous pressure prior to the floors above collapsing too, just by the heat build up alone, so you must not rule out that the force (mass) of the above floor levels collapsing did not cause displacement of said pressure via huge spurs and 'blow outs' at certain (albeit erractic) locations on the building.
As someone very correctly suggested earlier (apologies for not quoting you) the pressure would 'release' via the path of least resistance. This is also very plausible, and you must at the very least try to recognise that.
Originally posted by Dogdish
reply to post by BAZ752
I'm not questioning your credentials here, but if you were a professional, you wouldn't be here fervently defending a point that you cannot yet prove yourself. Anyone professional in our industry would know that it is prudent that one accepts all possibilities in the likelihood that unknowns can occur at any given time.
It is very possible that the spurs (exloded debris) were caused by purposefully placed explosive devices. It is also perfectly plausible that the spurs were generated by compressed air. Let us not forget that the draw of air within the building would also have reached enormous pressure prior to the floors above collapsing too, just by the heat build up alone, so you must not rule out that the force (mass) of the above floor levels collapsing did not cause displacement of said pressure via huge spurs and 'blow outs' at certain (albeit erractic) locations on the building.
As someone very correctly suggested earlier (apologies for not quoting you) the pressure would 'release' via the path of least resistance. This is also very plausible, and you must at the very least try to recognise that.
I am not an engineer, professional or otherwise. I do have a question; which I hope the professional engineers on this board won't find inane.
If it were pressure generated by compressed air, caused by the enormous pressure of the above floors collapsing; wouldn't the pressure take time to build?
What I'm saying is: Wouldn't the building have taken more time to fall?
If I can reword my question one more time, it would be: Wouldn't the explosions from the separate floors (given that there were charges detonated) actually lower the pressure between floors, thereby speeding up the fall of the floors, explaining the "free fall" speed of The Towers collapse?
Originally posted by Dogdish
reply to post by FDNY343
I don't think so; as an explosion originating at the support structure would necessarily push (blast) outward, causing a resistance to the inrush of air or anything else.
Then as the air would be "eaten" by the explosion/fire, the vacuum would be created, and then filled by the collapsing floors above, as well as any air which could re-fill the area of the explosion.
Rapid dominance is defined by its authors, Harlan K. Ullman and James P. Wade, as attempting "to affect the will, perception, and understanding of the adversary to fit or respond to our strategic policy ends through imposing a regime of Shock and Awe."
Further, rapid dominance will impose this overwhelming level of Shock and Awe against an adversary on an immediate or sufficiently timely basis to paralyze its will to carry on . . . [to] seize control of the environment and paralyze or so overload an adversary's perceptions and understanding of events that the enemy would be incapable of resistance at the tactical and strategic levels
Originally posted by Dogdish
reply to post by FDNY343
Your second question, as to how the explosives were brought in and planted:
In my own experience in security for a large casino for a time, I was chosen for a few different construction projects within the building.
The security detail is only concerned with what is being removed from the building, not what is brought in.
Originally posted by Dogdish
reply to post by FDNY343
I think the speed was necessary for a believable collapse. No one would have believed it if it fell one floor at a time, allowing time for the mass of the building to break every support, especially those not weakened by heat. Consider that there would also be a sound each time a floor collapsed; and the explosions needed to happen as a cohesive whole of a sound, and not a series of explosions, masked by the noise of the falling building.
Originally posted by Dogdish
Then you need to remember "Shock and Awe", or "the Doctrine of rapid dominance".
Rapid dominance is defined by its authors, Harlan K. Ullman and James P. Wade, as attempting "to affect the will, perception, and understanding of the adversary to fit or respond to our strategic policy ends through imposing a regime of Shock and Awe."
Further, rapid dominance will impose this overwhelming level of Shock and Awe against an adversary on an immediate or sufficiently timely basis to paralyze its will to carry on . . . [to] seize control of the environment and paralyze or so overload an adversary's perceptions and understanding of events that the enemy would be incapable of resistance at the tactical and strategic levels
Originally posted by Dogdish
Your second question, as to how the explosives were brought in and planted:
In my own experience in security for a large casino for a time, I was chosen for a few different construction projects within the building.
The security detail is only concerned with what is being removed from the building, not what is brought in.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by _BoneZ_
Precisely, it's self evident, plus these were steel structured buildings, and, the impact floors were not in the center.
Nothing absent the use of explosives can explain the actual phenomenon of destruction, which occured to within a mere few seconds of the time of absolute free fall for any freely dropped object, from the height of the TT's.
Originally posted by FDNY343
The sound of a collapsing building would have been in the range of 90-110 db. Explosions capable of creating a big enough vacuum would have been MUCH louder than that. I am guessing somewhere in the 140+ db range.
110 db is NOT going to cover up any sound at 140 db. Ever.
What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
Maybe to a casino, but not in a place that was the target of a terrorist attack in 1993. They had full time bomb sniffing dogs in and around the WTC before and after 9/11.
A police dog, Port Authority bomb sniffer and faithful partner of Officer David Lim. Sirius had no way of sniffing out the fact that the bombs would actually be planes filled with innocent passengers, carrying the deadly bacteria of Jihad. Lim managed to get out of the World Trade Center in time. Sirius did not.
Originally posted by Dogdish
The dogs, I think, were only there to find people, not explosives.
Originally posted by Dogdish
People heard the explosions.
Originally posted by Dogdish
"to affect the will, perception, and understanding of the adversary to fit or respond to our strategic policy ends through imposing a regime of Shock and Awe."
- the 'adversary' being us, therefore molding our response.
Originally posted by Dogdish
I have doubts as to the efficacy of dogs after eight years of routine 'sniffing', if in fact there were bomb sniffing dogs.
Originally posted by Dogdish
reply to post by Varemia
Exactly. Why then was the collapse so uniform?
Instead of the debris collecting (and collapsing) in what should become one side or the other of the "falling" building and creating a more 'lopsided' fall, we see a straight fall, floor by floor, except for the few large pieces which tip and fall to the side, as would be expected as the falling debris encountered resistance.
Originally posted by Dogdish
People heard the explosions.
Originally posted by FDNY343
During the collapses? Where? Citation needed.
"When I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, ... I saw low-level flashes ... I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down ... You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw."
- NYFD Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory
“It was like a professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."
- NYC Paramedic Daniel Rivera
"It was as if as if they had detonated ... as if they had planned to take down a building, boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom "
- NYFD Captain Dennis Tardio
"Somewhere around the middle . . . there was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just one flash. Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode ... With each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building"
- NYFD Captain Karin Deshore
"[T]here was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions." --Firefighter Richard Banaciski
Some of those dogs that he talks about were in service for many years.
Do you think that after 9 years, or however long, that the dogs' sniffers stop working? Does yours?
That is the most absurd thing I have ever heard.
I imagine that the exterior appearance of a uniform collapse is because of the design of the exterior of the towers. They had large steel panels pieced together, which would naturally fall away once the interior becomes destroyed, because there is no longer support holding them up. They would fall away only as the supports are completely destroyed by the interior collapse, and as such they make it seem as if the collapse is uniform, when on the inside it could be anything but.
Originally posted by Dogdish
So, you're still talking about dogs that were brought in after the fact.
Were these dogs looking for unexploded ordinance? What would be the purpose of that?
Originally posted by Dogdish
People heard the explosions.
Originally posted by FDNY343
During the collapses? Where? Citation needed.
911 Firefighters WTC - Confirm Bombs
"When I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, ... I saw low-level flashes ... I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down ... You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw."
- NYFD Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory
“It was like a professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."
- NYC Paramedic Daniel Rivera
"It was as if as if they had detonated ... as if they had planned to take down a building, boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom "
- NYFD Captain Dennis Tardio
Originally posted by Dogdish
Many more at the link., but this stands out:
"Somewhere around the middle . . . there was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just one flash. Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode ... With each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building"
- NYFD Captain Karin Deshore
Originally posted by Dogdish
and Police and Firemen Report What Really Happened...
"[T]here was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions." --Firefighter Richard Banaciski
I Googled "firemen heard explosions during collapse".
Originally posted by Dogdish
What was their schedule?
Originally posted by Dogdish
How often did they do a complete sweep?
Originally posted by Dogdish
Did they actually sniff every entrant of the complex?
Originally posted by Dogdish
When and how did the dogs change shifts?
Originally posted by Dogdish
How many dogs patrolled the complex?
Originally posted by Dogdish
Yeah, I think that after 9 years there is a lax attitude that creeps into a daily routine.
Originally posted by Dogdish
I also think that if 'someone' didn't want to let their people be sniffed, they wouldn't be.
Saltalamacia describes "grenade" like bombs, backs up William Rodriguez' story, numerous others that were ignored by 9/11 Commission
We all know how real demolitions are done months of work an usually first expolsives detonated are near the base and work up not like YOUR claimed puffs ahead of the floors as they collapse!!!!!!!
Saltalamacchia was in sub-basement B1 of the North Tower, approximately 1,100 feet below the airplane's impact point at floors 93 to 98.
In the the following You Tube video, Saltalamacia discusses what he witnessed on 9/11. The account backs up the events previously described by William Rodriguez.
"The explosion....at first we believe it came from the mechanical room and then we heard a series of other explosions that sounded up on the above levels of the building," said Saltalamacia.
The 9/11 Commission completely ignored the hundreds of survivors, professionals, first responders, firefighters and police who reported numerous secondary explosions at all levels of the twin towers.
In his video interview, Saltalamacia concluded by dismissing the official story of 9/11 as a "cover-up" and urged a proper investigation to find out the truth behind what he and others witnessed that day.