Worldwide Eugenics Operation: Professor Openly Calls For the Sterilization of the “Unfit”, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times
Topic started on 4-9-2010 @ 09:02 AM by gem_man
theintelhub.com...

"In what can be described as an open endorsement of eugenics, British Professor David Marsland has called for the sterilization of the people the the state deems unfit. Eugenics, the driving force behind Hitlers Holocaust, has a firm footing in our society, whether it be through the use of vaccines, Planned Parenthood, or forced sterilization."

Well, perhaps we could start with his children.

Seriously, This kind of talk could get out of control and end up with laws to sterilize , beginning of course with the mentally handicapped. From there different social groups could easily be added such as ATS posters and then whoever the elite wanted.


reply posted on 4-9-2010 @ 09:43 AM by foxhoundone
reply to post by jtma508


You forgot Estate agents J,
But back on topic who is going to make the call on who gets "the snip".
The social elite will have very narrow views on who is going to get the "shot" so to speak. It will be very worrying times for people here on ATS but the Sheeple will be blissfully unaware.. S&F ...



reply posted on 4-9-2010 @ 10:50 AM by Ferris.Bueller.II
Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, was also a strong proponent for eugenics.

Margaret Sanger - Eugenics and euthanasia

Sanger was a proponent of negative eugenics, a social philosophy which claims that human hereditary traits can be improved through social intervention. Sanger's eugenic policies ran to an exclusionary immigration policy, free access to birth control methods and full family-planning autonomy for the able-minded, and compulsory segregation or sterilization for the profoundly retarded. She expressly denounced euthanasia as a eugenics tool.

Sanger saw birth control as a means to prevent "dysgenic" children from being born into a disadvantaged life, and dismissed "positive eugenics" (which promoted greater fertility for the "fitter" upper classes) as impractical. Though many leaders in the negative eugenics movement were calling for active euthanasia of the "unfit," Sanger spoke out against such methods. She believed that women with the power and knowledge of birth control were in the best position to produce "fit" children. She rejected any type of eugenics that would take control out of the hands of those actually giving birth.



reply posted on 5-9-2010 @ 10:42 AM by soficrow
reply to post by gem_man




So Eugenics is making a comeback.

Professor Eugenics says, "Forget "rights," a free and just society has a duty to protect its children." He focuses on child abuse and neglect in the lower classes, and mentions overpopulated war-torn regions.

His solution to the world's ills: forced sterilization of "at-risk" parents, male and female.

...As I suggested in another thread:

Maybe Mother Nature has a better eye for "quality genes" than Eugenicists do.

Also, IMHO - It is far more abusive to delegate the care of one's children to nanny-strangers, ship them off to private school and never get to know them than it is to expose them to the other injustices and vagaries of real life.

More to the point: It is such 'upper class' abuse that creates sociopaths and psychopaths - far more often than the 'lower class' examples provided by Professor Eugenics. Moreover, upper class sociopaths have a far greater ability to impact far more people than the lower class variety.

...I don't deny that abuse and neglect are destructive. However, I DO believe that our attention in this regard must be directed to the ruling class rather than the lower classes, as the ruling class breeds the sociopaths who run our world - raising and educating them in such a manner so that they cannot help but become sociopathic. ...To the great detriment of the entire world, not just a micro-limited bit of it.


RE: Overpopulation

See The Overpopulation Myth, The Underpopulation Crisis

FYI - Populations in the third world are NOT exploding any longer. ...The so-called "diseases of civilization" are now named "age-related chronic disease" - and we've spread them to the developing world, along with infertility.

Ie., from Preconceptions.com: Global Infertility: Experiences in Other Countries...
In Africa, for example, some of the fastest population growth in the world co-exists with an infertility rate that in some areas is more than 30 percent.


...One of the saddest realities of infertility in much of the developing world is that it is largely preventable. "Most of the infertility is due to preventable infections," says Inhorn. These infections can be due to sexually transmitted diseases, poor hygiene and harmful health care practices. In addition, secondary infertility can be caused by untreated or poorly treated postpartum complications.

Both men and women in developing countries are exposed to higher levels of environmental and dietary toxins than people in North America. ...(causing infertility)



S&F btw


reply posted on 5-9-2010 @ 11:30 AM by JR MacBeth
reply to post by soficrow





More to the point: It is such 'upper class' abuse that creates sociopaths and psychopaths - far more often than the 'lower class' examples provided by Professor Eugenics. Moreover, upper class sociopaths have a far greater ability to impact far more people than the lower class variety.

...I DO believe that our attention in this regard must be directed to the ruling class rather than the lower classes, as the ruling class breeds the sociopaths who run our world - raising and educating them in such a manner so that they cannot help but become sociopathic. ...To the great detriment of the entire world, not just a micro-limited bit of it.


Fantastic. And thanks for referring me to this thread, I'm looking forward to a good debate.

I completely agree with you regarding refocusing on the elite, rather than the "lower" classes. This should be blatantly obvious to anyone. Why bother with the "nobody", who can do so little, and at the same time ignore the elite, who have a million times the impact?

Modern eugenics is just another tool of the elite, who look out upon this world as their own, and at those who live upon it, as their slaves.

Would our masters dare treat us like dogs, or cattle, attempting to breed this trait, or that, whichever suited their purposes best?

You bet. And this is what they have already been doing for a long time now.

Margaret Sanger has already been mentioned, but she's a great example. For her, the dark masses needed eradication. If you look at the history of Planned Parenthood, there is a focus on the minority that is not easy to dismiss, in spite of later appointing African American leaders (to perhaps make it look otherwise).

Eugenics is just wonderful! Until someone decides that YOU are not desired. Your eyes aren't blue enough...Get 'em up against the Wall!

Sheesh. When will people learn. Our masters are not smarter than Mother Nature.

But are they smart enough to fool the masses? Seemingly. They are doing a good job of it so far. Most people seem to believe in "overpopulation", and yet, it is a myth they created, to get us to willingly, do their bidding.

If they have their way, humanity will NOT be "better", but perhaps humanity will possess far more slavish traits than we do at the moment.

They don't necessarily want "healthier" people. Far more likely, they would prefer more DOCILITY in their slaves.

Think about it folks. Don't unwittingly support our insane masters. It will not be good us, and probably not for them either! But this won't stop them from trying. At least, let's not help them too much!

JR


reply posted on 5-9-2010 @ 11:55 AM by Unity_99
Originally posted by SaturnFX
One of the worst crimes of world war 2 was the fact that whenever anyone starts talking about eugenics, people immediately bring up nazi's.

The concept is perfectly fine...it is natural, it is darwinian...remove over time defective aspects of humanity and breed in positive traits.

So my question is this...should we focus on the betterment of the human species over time, or should we focus on being politically correct so not to make a fuss?

I think some unfit people should be sterilized...there are plenty of babies to adopt, but if you have some major genetic issue that is being passed down, why not try to stop that?

One could say that vaccines and cures is a form of eugenics...but because it has a different label, it is seen as a positive...What if a cure to some genetic abnormality also caused sterilization...would it be unheard of to give that cure out...instead let the person die because its less nazilike?


Who's the WE? There is no one who has authority over any one else, the reality of this life lesson and tests in this holographic universe/school is that: Love & Equality and really really understanding is the only ticket out of here.

The wanna be elites need to be arrested, but I don't give my power away to any of them, and most of the laws they already enacted are illegal crimes against humanity.

Stop thinking you can control others, judging anyone, and start thinking of helping free them, their minds and empower them. All anyone can do is encourage.

Surivival of the fittest is a mafia lords wet dream propganda lie.

Its all about love, respect and cooperation.

The duality is programming in your dna and the world. Look beyond it and within.

I would perform a citizens arrest on any of these negatives if they were within site of me!
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 15 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 11 days ago with 122 member flags
STOP....Take a STEP BACK....and look at the BIG PICTURE!!
  Posted 17 days ago with 115 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 16 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 14 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 13 days ago with 83 member flags