Madeleine McCann found by 4chan?, page 1

privacy

Pages: << 1 2 3 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times

Topic started on 3-9-2010 @ 09:09 PM by star in a jar

On a lark I went to 4chan.org and immediately saw this picture on this thread which has been '404'd- boards.4chan.org...

It was posted today, and the discovery was apparently made yesterday. Among the comments I saw one that said she was indeed rescued.

Can any confirm this?

Interesting timing since new info about Madeleine McCann came out only two days ago...

Has Madeleine indeed been found?

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:11 PM by Nventual

Well it doesn't really look like her. Is this screenshot of a thread the only proof?

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:12 PM by star in a jar

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:13 PM by Esoteric Teacher

reply to post by star in a jar

if this is/was a hoax, it is/was a very sick one indeed.

if this is her, i wish her and her family well, and a quick reunion.

[edit on 3-9-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:14 PM by Nventual

In 2nd look yeah it looks shockingly like her.

Are you saying the man who she was kidnapped for has held her all this time and has pictures of her in his house on his computer and then uploads them the moment he sees a picture of her on /b/?

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:15 PM by star in a jar

reply to post by Nventual
Unfortunately it's not a screenshot, it's an saved .jpg.

I think the thread was alive for only a few minutes. A lot of /b/ comments like 'wat' and 'wut' in rapid succession afterwards.

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:17 PM by kiwifoot

I've got a horrible feeling in the pit of my stomach that this is a load of BS, and I'm going to get very angry indeed.

I'm not having a go at the OP, just the sicko who made this up.

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:18 PM by jennybee35

reply to post by star in a jar

All I get when I click the link is a 404

Is the problem me or is this a hoax picture? If so, I hope they arrest whoever posted those pics on /b/!

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:20 PM by star in a jar

reply to post by Nventual
I wonder about that too, the story is that /b/ tracked her down from looking into the .exif data of the picture.

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:21 PM by Nventual

Originally posted by jennybee35
reply to post by star in a jar

All I get when I click the link is a 404 Is the problem me or is this a hoax picture? If so, I hope they arrest whoever posted those pics on /b/!

OP already said the thread had 404'd.

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:23 PM by star in a jar

reply to post by jennybee35
It was '404' because it showed a little girl tied up I think, 'rule 34' or something...

Or something else happened.

I agree with Kiwifoot, if this is a hoax... I'm going to be upset too.

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:24 PM by janon

Hard to say but coming from /b/ it's more than likely a fake. The person probably just convinced their little sister to pose for the photo. It could be any little blond haired girl really.

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:26 PM by Nventual

Originally posted by star in a jar
reply to post by jennybee35
It was '404' because it showed a little girl tied up I think, 'rule 34' or something...

Or something else happened.

I agree with Kiwifoot, if this is a hoax... I'm going to be upset too.

Lol rule 34 is (usually drawn) porn of childhood cartoons, toys, etc. For example spongebob naked.

[edit on 3/9/10 by Nventual]

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:27 PM by star in a jar

reply to post by Nventual
Yeah I don't know... It does seem odd, the time frame. It could have been in someone's 'collection' or something.

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:29 PM by Nventual

I believe the first photo of the girl in the whatever (warddrobe?) was posted on /b/ a couple of months ago. I searched on google for the filename of the photo and it came up in a thread on /b/ in July.

I don't want to post the number here because otherwise people will be coming here and seeing my post when they're searching for the photo.

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:29 PM by Miraj

reply to post by star in a jar

Thats not rule 34..

Rule 34 is "If it exists, there is porn of it. No exceptions."

So maybe R34 did get it closed.

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:30 PM by SpectreDC

Originally posted by Nventual

Originally posted by star in a jar
reply to post by jennybee35
It was '404' because it showed a little girl tied up I think, 'rule 34' or something...

Or something else happened.

I agree with Kiwifoot, if this is a hoax... I'm going to be upset too.

Lol rule 34 is porn of childhood animations, toys, etc, pretty much porn of anything that shouldn't be porn.

No, rule 34 is the rule that if it exists, there is porn of it.

And it's true. Do not test this, of fear of ruining your child hood.

I've even seen a mountain dew and a sandwich doing it.

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:31 PM by star in a jar

reply to post by Nventual
I'm a newb, I don't know much about the culture there, so I hope it's ok for me to post the image on ATS

IF she is indeed Madeleine McCann, then she is potentially a threat to those who have abused (?) her... Powerful people... I hope something indeed has happened to secure her release.

reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 09:32 PM by Nventual

Yeah sorry I knew the actual definition of Rule 34. It's just when I first saw it used it was some cartoon characters I grew up with doing things I'll never forget, so I mentioned that instead.