It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Earthquake that hit New Zealand clearly man made

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 3 2010 @ 07:18 PM
link   
I present no evidence but only my assertion that 7.2 is not a natural number and that the quake didn't feel "right."

From this I present my argument that Ming the Merciless has been sitting in Mongo and repeatedly pushing the "Earthquake" button on his Destruction Machine?

If you don't agree, you're just not open minded enough, man.




posted on Sep, 3 2010 @ 07:27 PM
link   
If this is an attempt at humour, you failed.




posted on Sep, 3 2010 @ 07:29 PM
link   
reply to post by DeltaNine
 


Why even waste the time to write that?



posted on Sep, 3 2010 @ 07:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
If this is an attempt at humour, you failed.





How did he ever manage to get through that OP without even mentioning the dreaded HAARP word?



posted on Sep, 3 2010 @ 07:31 PM
link   
reply to post by DeltaNine
 


did you try posting this thread in the trash bin forum first?



posted on Sep, 3 2010 @ 07:31 PM
link   
reply to post by DeltaNine
 


If there were a way to offer negative star and flag to those individuals that drag down this site, sir you would have obtained a thousand by myself. Please crawl back to your bottle and kindly go away.



posted on Sep, 3 2010 @ 07:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by DeltaNine
I present no evidence but only my assertion that 7.2 is not a natural number and that the quake didn't feel "right."


A earthquake machine would have to mimic the natural resonance frequency of the earth they want to influence. So the frequency needed to instigate a earthquake is natural, so even if the outcome is 7.2, it is still a natural number.

This is a joke thread right, to make a statement about the wild stories with no evidence at all?



posted on Sep, 3 2010 @ 07:35 PM
link   
reply to post by ArcAngel
 


look at this members personal profile page.

this is their 46th authored thread. the member has 5 flags.



posted on Sep, 3 2010 @ 07:40 PM
link   
reply to post by DeltaNine
 



I present no evidence but only my assertion that 7.2 is not a natural number and that the quake didn't feel "right."


Well at least you've admitted you have no evidence.

Seeing as how every other earth quake we know of was natural I don't understand why we would get the idea one is man made.



If you don't agree, you're just not open minded enough, man.


I get it


This is parody right? You're making fun of gullible people who come out after every Hurricane and quake claiming its man-made and that those who don't agree are just closed-minded or sheep... If that's the case and this is a joke



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 12:51 AM
link   
It certainly is a parody/satire of some of the threads on ATS.

If some of you people were offended or went in thinking it was real, I make little to no apology.


Take it easy guys, and remember, flags don't mean jack. FWIW most of my started threads were before flags were introduced, if that means anything to some of you.

Peace out amigos.



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 07:13 AM
link   
Umm, dude - I grew up on the West Coast (go Hokitika!) and we had earthquakes all the time (Especially during winter) so what doesn't feel right about this quake? Seriously, do you have any experience with the Ring of Fire that I grew up on?

Cheers
Shane



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 07:14 AM
link   
reply to post by shamus78
 


Dang it! You got me!

Well played Sir!



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 09:52 AM
link   
Shalom Shamus,

In the North Island born and raised,

Avoiding politicians is how I spend most of my days.




posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 10:07 AM
link   
A flag and Star for deceiving me, good Sir!

Oh, you can't Star in BTS? then Just a flag for you!

[edit on 4/9/10 by shamus78]




top topics



 
2

log in

join