It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by [davinci]
Originally posted by 547000
And what is this, precrime?
No, it's real crime. It's called Cruelty to Animals. Look it up, I bet the community that you live in has similar laws.
Again, you are missing the point.
Did she shoot them each in the head? No.
Did she put them in a burlap bag weighted with stones and kill them en mass? No.
She enjoyed throwing them into the water one by one. She smiled as she did it.
There is no hypocrisy here friend. There is a child who enjoyed the suffering of animals.
I know family farmers and none of them enjoy slaughter day(s). They do it because it needs to be done, but they don't leap out of bed with a smile on thier face and they don't draw it out in an effort to prolong the animal's suffering.
Originally posted by DrumsRfun
reply to post by 547000
If you can't tell the difference between killing a spider and killing a dog then i sure hope you don't own any pets.
Killing a spider isn't considered animal abuse...killing a dog is.
Ask the next scared girl if it was ok that you killed that spider,then ask if its ok to kill a dog.
i've just watched that for the first time.
ya. i would slap a girl, ...now.
not too hard though.
i would like her to be conscious enough for when i threw her into the river.
could i chuck her 20 feet, maybe a little further?
yes. yes i could.
Originally posted by badw0lf
The puppies were not killed for any reason other than to satisfy a retarded 12 year old idiots lust for torture. NOTHING MORE.
Originally posted by badw0lf
When will people stop equating the barbaric slaughter of the foods we eat (due to complacency and silver spoon mentality) with the outright torture and suffering of innocent animals.
Originally posted by badw0lf
If you eat it, you can kill it. If you just want to have a laugh, IT IS WRONG.
GET IT NOW?
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Originally posted by badw0lf
The puppies were not killed for any reason other than to satisfy a retarded 12 year old idiots lust for torture. NOTHING MORE.
I think it says she was told to throw them in the river by her grandmother, because the puppies were sick.
So, I'm afraid you're wrong on that one.
Originally posted by badw0lf
When will people stop equating the barbaric slaughter of the foods we eat (due to complacency and silver spoon mentality) with the outright torture and suffering of innocent animals.
In what way are these puppies ''innocent'', but cows, sheep and pigs aren't ?
Seriously, I don't know how people like you can post this stuff, while keeping a straight face !
Originally posted by badw0lf
If you eat it, you can kill it. If you just want to have a laugh, IT IS WRONG.
GET IT NOW?
There's nothing to ''get'', except rampant hypocrisy from many people in this thread, and their selective indignation at animal cruelty.
Who says that you should be able to torture and kill innocent animals, purely because they taste nice ?