Very vague. Can you give a link or cite a source? Need more information.
Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy , page
privacy
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 2-9-2010 @ 08:54 PM by Mythkiller
What is up with this?
www.youtube.com...
Why has this one area of sky been blacked out? This is extremely worrying, there seems to be no logical explanation for this
Anyone able to help
find one?
[edit on 2-9-2010 by Mythkiller]
www.youtube.com...
Why has this one area of sky been blacked out? This is extremely worrying, there seems to be no logical explanation for this
Anyone able to help
find one? [edit on 2-9-2010 by Mythkiller]
reply posted on 2-9-2010 @ 09:12 PM by serbsta
This video/issue was addressed a while ago:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
It usually comes down to errors in image compression, as that part of the sky is visible from the Earth at certain times and it really doesn't make for a good hiding spot.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
It usually comes down to errors in image compression, as that part of the sky is visible from the Earth at certain times and it really doesn't make for a good hiding spot.
reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 12:18 AM by dragnet53
reply to post by The Endtime Warrior
unless this wormwood is a brown dwarf then amateurs have no chance on seeing it without using an infrared telescope and a good one not some cheap BS one.
coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu...
unless this wormwood is a brown dwarf then amateurs have no chance on seeing it without using an infrared telescope and a good one not some cheap BS one.
coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu...
reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 12:42 PM by stereologist
reply to post by dragnet53
Brown dwarfs reflect light. A brown dwarf also has a strong gravitational field. It would be visible to the naked eye by now. Even amateurs would begin to notice that the planets are not at their predicted positions.
A brown dwarf is a failed claim.
Brown dwarfs reflect light. A brown dwarf also has a strong gravitational field. It would be visible to the naked eye by now. Even amateurs would begin to notice that the planets are not at their predicted positions.
A brown dwarf is a failed claim.
reply posted on 3-9-2010 @ 01:33 PM by Xcalibur254
reply to post by dragnet53
Once again, brown dwarfs reflect light, thus they are able to be seen in the visible spectrum. It's just easier to see them with an infrared telescope because they don't reflect much light. Amateur astronomers have been able to see brown dwarfs light years away not even using high-end telescopes equipped with a coronagraph or a CCD. So if they can see them light years away, why can't they see one within our own solar system?
Once again, brown dwarfs reflect light, thus they are able to be seen in the visible spectrum. It's just easier to see them with an infrared telescope because they don't reflect much light. Amateur astronomers have been able to see brown dwarfs light years away not even using high-end telescopes equipped with a coronagraph or a CCD. So if they can see them light years away, why can't they see one within our own solar system?
reply posted on 4-9-2010 @ 05:59 PM by stereologist
reply to post by Khaaaaaan!!
Nemesis is not going to enter the inner part of the solar system. The predicted object based on a 26My cyclic event stays far out from the inner solar system.
No new planet can enter the orbits of the known planets. That's been well established.
Nemesis is not going to enter the inner part of the solar system. The predicted object based on a 26My cyclic event stays far out from the inner solar system.
No new planet can enter the orbits of the known planets. That's been well established.
reply posted on 4-9-2010 @ 07:00 PM by Khaaaaaan!!
reply to post by stereologist
That is good to know, but I was just interested in the view we are getting of Jupiter actually.
I never knew we were suppose to see the moons of Jupiter with the naked eye. I have yet to find a site that says"and in september you will be able to see the moons of jupiter without the aid of a telescope".
For the last 3 weeks, me and my co workers have been observing this celestial treat. We test the hypothesis by looking and declaring how the 4 moons will appear before looking in a scope or bino's, and we get it right almost every time (depends on the light conditions)
I've seen your post on various subjects, and value your imput on those discussions, so if you could help me out, it would be appreciated.
That is good to know, but I was just interested in the view we are getting of Jupiter actually.
I never knew we were suppose to see the moons of Jupiter with the naked eye. I have yet to find a site that says"and in september you will be able to see the moons of jupiter without the aid of a telescope".
For the last 3 weeks, me and my co workers have been observing this celestial treat. We test the hypothesis by looking and declaring how the 4 moons will appear before looking in a scope or bino's, and we get it right almost every time (depends on the light conditions)
I've seen your post on various subjects, and value your imput on those discussions, so if you could help me out, it would be appreciated.
reply posted on 4-9-2010 @ 07:44 PM by stereologist
reply to post by Khaaaaaan!!
The moons of Jupiter are easy to spot in a telescope or even binoculars. When Galileo saw the Jovian moons for the first time in 1582 he had indisputable proof that the Earth could not be the center of the universe. For there before his eyes were things going around Jupiter and not around the Earth. What interested Galileo about the moons was that he saw them as a potential clock in the sky. If people could accurately tell time regardless of where they were on the Earth, then they could determine their longitude.
It seems easy to claim that the moons are far away and too dim compared to the brilliance of Jupiter to be seen by the naked eye, which is why the invention of the telescope was required to detect the moons.
Is that true, or not? I suggest the following article:
Naked-Eye Observations of Jupiter’s Moons
Also take a gander at this.
Gan De - wikipedia
The moons of Jupiter are easy to spot in a telescope or even binoculars. When Galileo saw the Jovian moons for the first time in 1582 he had indisputable proof that the Earth could not be the center of the universe. For there before his eyes were things going around Jupiter and not around the Earth. What interested Galileo about the moons was that he saw them as a potential clock in the sky. If people could accurately tell time regardless of where they were on the Earth, then they could determine their longitude.
It seems easy to claim that the moons are far away and too dim compared to the brilliance of Jupiter to be seen by the naked eye, which is why the invention of the telescope was required to detect the moons.
Is that true, or not? I suggest the following article:
Naked-Eye Observations of Jupiter’s Moons
Also take a gander at this.
Gan De - wikipedia
Gan De is reported to have seen one of the moons of Jupiter (either Ganymede or Callisto) with his naked eye in 364 BC
reply posted on 4-9-2010 @ 08:14 PM by Khaaaaaan!!
reply to post by stereologist
TY, I ran across the report from 1976, but never the wiki on Gan De........good stuff.
Not being able to see Io because of the glare makes sense, but I will say we can make out at least 3 of them for the past few nights, and will continue to observe to see if the view improves. I found out thru stellarium, that our worlds will continue to close the distance till sept 20th so I'm hopeing the moons will be visible with even more clarity.
TY, I ran across the report from 1976, but never the wiki on Gan De........good stuff.
Not being able to see Io because of the glare makes sense, but I will say we can make out at least 3 of them for the past few nights, and will continue to observe to see if the view improves. I found out thru stellarium, that our worlds will continue to close the distance till sept 20th so I'm hopeing the moons will be visible with even more clarity.
reply posted on 4-9-2010 @ 09:38 PM by stereologist
reply to post by Khaaaaaan!!
The reason you only see 3 moons is probably because 1 of the moons is either in front of or behind Jupiter.
In the following link you can see that the Jovian moon positions is well known.
Jovian Moons
I found the following to generate tables of the positions of the moons of Jupiter.
ephemeris table Jovian moons
The reason you only see 3 moons is probably because 1 of the moons is either in front of or behind Jupiter.
In the following link you can see that the Jovian moon positions is well known.
Jovian Moons
I found the following to generate tables of the positions of the moons of Jupiter.
ephemeris table Jovian moons
Pages: ^^TOP^^
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
Code Name** Stellar Wind. Objective** Infiltrate All. Chances For Sucess** High.
General Conspiracies: 11 hours ago, 17 flags
General Conspiracies: 11 hours ago, 17 flags
As Commandos Raid Tampa, US State Dept Demands Power to Declare War?
New World Order: 13 hours ago, 12 flags
New World Order: 13 hours ago, 12 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.110 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.110 seconds
