It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Confusion42
Originally posted by jaktenstid
Saying that existence came into being from non-existence is absolute lunacy. And then scientists like Hawking attempt to "rationalize" this notion by tossing about imaginitive theories on multiverses, supergravity, superstrings, and the like. And people are paying attention to this crap?
Do you even understand M-Theory?
And saying that existence came into being from non-existence is absolute lunacy yet saying that there was a Creator who came about from non-existence (if that is indeed your viewpoint), is beyond lunacy.
Originally posted by Confusion42
Originally posted by jaktenstid
Saying that existence came into being from non-existence is absolute lunacy. And then scientists like Hawking attempt to "rationalize" this notion by tossing about imaginitive theories on multiverses, supergravity, superstrings, and the like. And people are paying attention to this crap?
Do you even understand M-Theory?
And saying that existence came into being from non-existence is absolute lunacy yet saying that there was a Creator who came about from non-existence (if that is indeed your viewpoint), is beyond lunacy.
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
Originally posted by Faustian Spirit
Even though I do respect Hawking as a brilliant scientist that he is, he fails massively when he afirms something of that magnitude, which is pathetic. He might as well show me the proofs that God didn't create the Universe, instead of assuming and blabbering that he didn't. As a devout non-believer that I am, I, nevertheless, demand proof that A or B exist/don't exist to make a conclusion. That's called good science.
Hawking is not about good science. The only thing that made a name for him was proven wrong and he even admitted it. If he was not a cripple no one would know him. That is what he is known for being a cripple.
He backs nothing up with facts. NOTHING he makes wild claims that he does not even try to prove. He is a snake oil sales man.
[edit on 8-9-2010 by Subjective Truth]
Originally posted by Flighty
So if Hawkins categorically states that GOD DIDN'T CREATE THE UNIVERSE, I assume then he has met and spoken to or seen GOD to totally eliminate him from the equation?
I'd be more interested in hearing about this meeting with the great entity than any scientific theory he could ever come up with.
Originally posted by Flighty
So if Hawkins categorically states that GOD DIDN'T CREATE THE UNIVERSE, I assume then he has met and spoken to or seen GOD to totally eliminate him from the equation?
I'd be more interested in hearing about this meeting with the great entity than any scientific theory he could ever come up with.
Originally posted by Gazrok
Inevitably, even Hawking's explanation runs into the same problem as those espousing God....
If the Universe created itself.....WHAT did it create itself out OF? The idea of it just spontaneously happening requires just as much faith as the idea of the intelligent design of a Creator.
What was there before the Universe?
Where did God come from, who created him?
Both questions have the same answer...they just were. And both of those answers require faith.