It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Djin
Needless to say "Banana Man" et al will have to actually read a little or fall back on the good old "It's all a matter of faith" trick
Originally posted by enduser
btw i believe that there is more to the universe than meets the eye however, i fail to believe in the god of the bible!
Originally posted by enduser
actually, seeing as you have god in front of you, please ask how god was created? yeah yeah i know, we dont need to know, easy cop out for you religious folk
Originally posted by illumin8ed
Science will never prove that "nothing" ever existed.
[edit on 3-9-2010 by illumin8ed]
Exactly. Nothing does in fact NOT exist. Otherwise we could scientifically and objectively measure it. We can not measure something that does not exist. That's why physicists come up with the Multiverse theory, it makes it possible for nothing to exist OUTSIDE our physical universe. But we can only measure INSIDE our system.
This is quack physics.
[edit on 3-9-2010 by tobiascore]
Originally posted by EnlightenUp
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
It's not fact, it's a theory.
And I doubt it's true either.
"A theory" is actually quite a strong designation for something that is falsifiable and has a great deal of empirical evidence in support of it as an explanation. If you call it a "theory", scientifically speaking, it's quite a favorable statement.
If you don't think it's true, find something verifiable that it cannot explain that undermines it's basic tenets.
Sorry on my part for the misunderstanding.
Originally posted by TarzanBeta
... I did not mean to say that scientists would be so foolish as you believed I was saying. Sorry.
Originally posted by enduser
Come on, be sensible! you are avoiding my points with BS! of course the universe exists and of course i can experience myself, the simple fact that im replying to your ridiculous claims is evidence that i know the universe as well as myself exist! what does that prove? it does not prove that god exists! how old are you?
Originally posted by enduser
Yeah yeah the universe is god, jesus christ how foolish of me! god only knows why i bother trying to discuss things with fanatics :S
Originally posted by enduser
The fact you use the word god implies that you have some religious beliefs so i apologise if i have misconstrued your faith/beliefs.
Originally posted by enduser
You are so confused it's hilarious to me.
i feel the same way about you oh holy than thou!
Originally posted by enduser
and with that im not going to continue chasing my tail with religious people because there is literally no point, we can agree to disagree and i shall see you in hell
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by DaMod
The point isn't that there is no God, its that the Universe could have created itself without one.
It is a "systematic enterprise of gathering knowledge about the world and organizing and condensing that knowledge into testable laws and theories".
Originally posted by Hot_Wings
reply to post by illumin8ed
Cast not your pearls before swine my friend. Remember that they are denying what is self evident in most people. If they deny what thier own heart tells them then you can convince them of nothing. As well, if they will not listen to the prophits then there is no one else that they will listen to.
Originally posted by DaMod
reply to post by ModernAcademia
It's stated so "as a matter of fact" when it's not definitive proof or disproof. That's bad science.
Originally posted by RestingInPieces
LOL. That's classic creationism. I also like the one where the guy disproves evolution because peanut butter doesn't create new life even when the lights in the grocery store are on!
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
A rabbi responds
But his finding were described by Sacks as an "elementary fallacy" of logic.
"There is a difference between science and religion. Science is about explanation. Religion is about interpretation. The Bible simply isn't interested in how the universe came into being."
"But there is more to wisdom than science. It cannot tell us why we are here or how we should live. Science masquerading as religion is as unseemly as religion masquerading as science."
www.guardian.co.uk...
This should be interesting because it may spark alot of scientific and philosophical debates, which is a good thing.
I would probably agree with Hawkings though, God is not required to create the universe.
And then the rabbi said the bible doesn't care who created it.
But then why call God the creator then?
www.cnn.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by sapien82
reply to post by Pentothal
Yes because the last time any religion will damn a man of science as a heretic ended with Galileo