It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
As I metioned before, the prevailing winds travel form west to east. You mentuioned that the contrails were moving from west to east,
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by Slippery Jim
My thoughts? I think you are seeing contrails of aircraft diverting around a hurricane rather than flying through it.
I don't believe for one minute you or any other 'chemtrail' proponents will pay any attention to a logical reason though.
well I'm gonna have to point out the obvious here.
Where did these jets come from that you speak of?
the only airport SSE of me is Myrtle Beach Int.
And they are a small airport and don't have that many
flights out of there.
Now another point,
all of these chemtrails are going the same direction,
SSW to NNE. Is there not any planes going TO
Myrtle Beach ??? In the opposite direction?
Nope !!!! That kinda blows a hole in your
theory when it's not a 2-way jet corridor
around a hurricane.
Moshe Alamaro, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(MIT), told The Sunday Telegraph of his plans to "paint" the tops of
hurricanes black by scattering carbon particles – either soot or black
particles from the manufacture of tyres – from aircraft flying above
the storms. The particles would absorb heat from the sun, leading to
changes in the airflows within the storm. Satellites could also heat
the cloud tops by beaming microwaves from space.
"If they're done in the right place at the right time they can affect
the strength of the hurricane," Mr Alamaro said.
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
I would say the idea wouldnt work as well as the models suggest.
Now try and grasp the sheer quantity of the particulates needed to achieve their goal.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
That would mean that Katrina could of been prevented?
no, not prevented
just diverted to another location
as once it gets in the gulf it had to
make landfall somewhere.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
I would say the idea wouldnt work as well as the models suggest.
well this theory is coming from MIT.
Do you have more credentials than MIT
to make that judgment call?
Remember, you called me out on my
qualifications, turn about is fair play
Originally posted by boondock-saint
reply to post by 4nsicphd
sorry I don't mean to pander here
but your theory presented is based entirely
on the assumption that you would need to
cover the entire hurricane with the matter.
The theory doesn't state how much substance
matter would be needed to affect the hurricane.
So all your calculations are useless.
A tire doesn't require all 100% of it's surface
touching the road to make it stop.
[edit on 2-9-2010 by boondock-saint]
Originally posted by 4nsicphd
OK, maybe Moshe only needs to paint half of it. That still requires orders of magnitude more aircraft than have ever been made.
Now you tell me exactly how much, and what part, of he hurricane needs painting.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by 4nsicphd
OK, maybe Moshe only needs to paint half of it. That still requires orders of magnitude more aircraft than have ever been made.
Now you tell me exactly how much, and what part, of he hurricane needs painting.
bro, we just don't know at this point
how much needs painting to make a directional
shift or slow it down. The article was not that
in depth. But it was from 2007 so I'm ASSUMING
he has worked on this theory since the article
was published. Who knows, maybe even for
the US Military???