It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

How do you steer a hurricane? CHEMTRAILS!

page: 12
27
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 02:54 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 




posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 02:56 AM
link   
reply to post by CynicalM
 


Sure can:

www.exopoliticsinstitute.org...

Guess who wrote the bill?

Members of exopolitics.

Seriously mate, keep up.



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 02:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
Do you still think you should have come out of the closet?

Don't you think it was better when you were like....."us"?

yea, I knew you were having a lil fun at my expense

But I'm a big boy, water on a duck's back.

Now as far as your quote above:
I'm confused, can you elaborate
what you mean ????



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 02:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
Do you still think you should have come out of the closet?
Don't you think it was better when you were like....."us"?

yea, I knew you were having a lil fun at my expense

But I'm a big boy, water on a duck's back.
Now as far as your quote above:
I'm confused, can you elaborate
what you mean ????


Boondock-saint.....

I meant like "us"......not a chemtrailer.....

You know.....normal.

Cheers
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:00 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 

Carol Rosin worked with Von Braun
who she claims told her:

"You must stop the weaponization
of space"



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:00 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 



How much more undermining can be done by proposing to ban alien weapons, tectonic weapons, psycotronic weapons and the like??


I thought I was keeping up as I saw NO mention of the term "alien" in the bill..
Care to show me where it is in "the bill" ?



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
I meant like "us"......not a chemtrailer.....

You know.....normal.

lmao
u cwack me up bro
who says YOU are normal ???




posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:16 AM
link   
speaking of normal, I would love to pop on
CNN later today to see a CNN poll with the question:

"Do you think Chemtrails exist?"

A; Yes
B: No
C: What is a Chemtrail?
D: Not Sure

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

then we might just see who is normal
and who is not


If the No votes outnumber the rest
of the field, then I might consider you
normal



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:18 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 

And what exactly does that accomplish?

Because a bill was introduced, which contains the word "chemtrails", it means there is a technology which exists to do...something (just exactly what depends on who you talk to about it) on a planetwide basis?

Because a bill was introduced, which contains the word psychotronic, it means that there are such weapons. Just what does that mean anyway? They force us to watch Grade B movies?

Psychotronic is a film genre made up of horror films, spaghetti westerns, low-budget independent features, exploitation films that was coined by author Michael J. Weldon, best known for his books, Psychotronic Encyclopedia of Film and Psychotronic Video Guide.

Source

But maybe you can explain how "chemtrails" and HAARP fit into a bill which was supposedly designed to:

To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.

Are chemtrails in space? The bill does not mention HAARP but is HAARP space based? Section 7.2.B does not make any sense in the context of the bill. It was thrown in by Webre (et.al.). Kucinich has disavowed it. Saying that because something has been introduced in a bill makes it real is absurd, let me refer you to PUBLIC LAW 107–243—OCT. 16, 2002.



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
I meant like "us"......not a chemtrailer.....
You know.....normal.

lmao
u cwack me up bro
who says YOU are normal ???


Gee you're a "good sport", Boondock!

(That's a big Aussie compliment.....)

But.....

To get back on topic & pay respect to your objective with this thread.....

I just can't see how your theory hangs together.....and.....

I just can't understand how "chemtrails" can be accepted for 1 second as real, in view of the unequivocal weight of scientific proof that "chemtrails" do not exist.

I find this most disturbing, young Boondock.....

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 4-9-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:23 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


You have a reasonable brain Phage..

So you must know that it is possible to prove something exists but damn near impossible to prove it doesn't..

You and your mates are trying to prove the impossible



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:27 AM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 



I just can't understand how "chemtrails" can be accepted for 1 second as real, in view of the unequivocal weight of scientific proof that "chemtrails" do not exist.


First, being the expert, would you care to define what a chemtrail is??

I've seen proof of chemicals sprayed from planes...
There's no doubt about that..

I'm just curious what we need to see to know "chemtrails" exist..

Maybe we are all argueing about definition rather than facts..



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:29 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



Carol Rosin worked with Von Braun who she claims told her:

"You must stop the weaponization of space"


Boon, I don't think you're fully fluent in the ways of the Exopolitics guys. You shouldn't underestimate their willingness to misinterpret evidence and put words in the mouths of others. Rosin sits at the top table in Exopolitics.

We only have her word that V Braun said these things. I suspect he actually said those words and maybe in a different order? Rosin has added the context. She's used implication and suggestion to associate a long-time dead V Braun with the agendas of Exopolitics.

Without exception, the Exo people are happy to lie, misconstrue evidence and mislead. In fact, if you like to wonder about people being paid...I'd look at one or two of the Exos...



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:29 AM
link   
reply to post by CynicalM
 


Much obliged my friend!


(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;
(ii) chemtrails;
(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;
(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;
(v) laser weapons systems;
(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and
(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.


emphasis by me.



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:30 AM
link   
reply to post by CynicalM
 

So where is the proof that "chemtrails" exist? Should be easy enough to come up with.

Some people seem to get very upset about something that has not been proven to exist.

Some people, based on their belief that such a something exists, are perfectly willing to ignore the fact that a perfectly normal phenomenon (persistent contrails) exists and has existed ever since the early days of powered flight. That there is no difference between the accepted definition of "chemtrails" and persistent contrails.

Some people are willing to let their own ignorance, speculation, and fear run away with them.

And then, there are some people who prefer to use reason, facts, and critical thought.



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:36 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


Much obliged my friend!


(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;
(ii) chemtrails;
(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;
(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;
(v) laser weapons systems;
(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and
(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.


emphasis by me.


Am I going blind Chad??
I'm sure I don't see the word "alien" anywhere in your post..
Even in the bit you emphassised...



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:40 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 



Some people are willing to let their own ignorance, speculation, and fear run away with them.

And then, there are some people who prefer to use reason, facts, and critical thought.


And you fit in which group Phage??



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
But maybe you can explain how "chemtrails" and HAARP fit into a bill which was supposedly designed to:

Phage
u cannot be this naive.
I have seen lots of your other posts
and know you to be highly intelligent
and a valued asset to ATS.

But the answer you seek is in the technique
used for chemtrails and HAARP combined.

Chemtrails disburse chemicals into the air
in a cloud form, very similar to the way
flak was used against bombers in WW2.
Little bits of chemicals sifting in the air
then HAARP is bounced off the upper sphere
to hit the chemicals to heat them up.
So the actual HAARP beam exceeds the 60K
feet designated as the border between
earth's atmosphere and outer space.
Therefore if it crosses over that border
then it is considered a space weapon.
As the beam mirrored is considered
coming from outer space.
When those chemicals heat up by HAARP
over a hurricane, it raises the top temp
of the hurricane and makes it stall.
You do not have to cover the entire
hurricane to do this. View it like a plastic
stir for your coffee. When you put your stir
in to mix your creme, the whole amount of coffee
moves by 1 lil stir. Now stir it in the opposite
direction a few times and it comes to a grinding
halt. You have stopped a large amount
of coffee with 1 lil plastic stir.
Chemtrails and HAARP combine
to make that stir that shuts down
and stalls the hurricane. However,
the process is short lived cuz the
stir falls and disburses when it hits the
prevailing winds. So when the chemicals
drop inside the hurricane winds, new
chemicals have to be disbursed above
the hurricane to start the process over again
which is why there were so many
chemtrails in succession over the bands of Earl.



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:43 AM
link   
reply to post by CynicalM
 


I think you are going blind.

You see, as I've already mentioned, this bill was written by members of exopolitics.

How obvious does it have to be?



posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 03:46 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


So...uhh..what about all the other times people see chemtrails and there is no hurricane?

What are they for?




top topics



 
27
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join