It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Third guy said people inside witnessed massive explosions at nine in the morning . What type of controlled demolition gets initiated at 9am but doesn't cause a collapse until 5pm ? And how many people were killed in WTC7 ?
Know a number of people who workin WTC 7 for Soloman - none of them
told me of any explosions in the building. One guy I worked with who was there was outside smoking when first plane hit, watched as 15 minutes later the second plane hit.
Now the aircraft impacts probably sounded like explosions to those who did not witness the aircraft impacts.....
Originally posted by KILL_DOGG
Originally posted by stirling
9/11 WAS an inside job......i couldnt have been accomplished if it werent.
A few other relevant questions....
Where are the huge jet engines(2) which should have definately survived the pentagon attack?(they couldnt have been destroyed as they weigh toins and are 8 ft in dia.)
we only saw one piddlingly small engine rotor part recovered.
Where are all the suitcases and luggage, tail assembly,etc... that should have strewn the pentagon lawn?
The truth is there are so many holes in the official theory that it can never explain the reality of what occured.
Let me refer you to this for your answer:
[edit on 1-9-2010 by KILL_DOGG]
Originally posted by Alfie1
Thanks again for further various responses but I was really hoping that members would address the situation at the WTC as I set out in the op.
WTC 7 is often quoted by truthers as a "smoking gun " proving controlled demolition but I suggest that, on the contrary, it in fact proves a gaping hole in truther theories.
What I think people need to do is to look back and consider what alleged perps must have planned if they rigged WTC 1, 2,&7. The obvious inference is that the intention was to bring down all 3 buildings on 9/11. So, how did they intend that to look ? Their lives were on the line so effective cover-up was essential. And indeed, for WTC 1 & 2 there was very elaborate cover-up. Planes flown into them and a cd so sophisticated that it could apparently be initiated from the plane impact points.
But then, as regards WTC 7 they evidently made no provision for cover-up at all. You have to forget about WTC 7 being hit by debris from WTC 1 because that happened by chance and could not have been part of the planning.
Therefore, if you believe WTC 7 was a cd, you have believe that the perps planned its demolition to go ahead as it stood there in perfect order and in sight of likely thousands of witnesses.
I suggest that this is so wildly improbable as to amount to reasonable proof that WTC 7 was not a cd. It was collateral damage from a terrorist attack on the Towers.
Originally posted by aethron
Well I suppose if the OP is correct we should be seeing a new breed of demolition firms emerging from the study of WTC7's collapse.
Using computers like NISTs, they can calculate how a few swings of a wrecking ball and a couple of small but strategically placed fires can accomplish exactly what formerly required months of expensive planning and preparations by a team of professional demolition experts.
They will save skyscraper owners heaps of bucks.
I have'nt heard of any, but do you know if any such firms are operating using the new principles already?
Originally posted by okbmd
You guys desperately need to get real .
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by baboo
Every single statement that you made has been repeated WORD-FOR-WORD by just about every truther on here .
When are you guys gonna come up with your own opinions instead of just following the herd ?
Originally posted by baboo
The architect that was involved in the design stated a few months prior to the impact that the towers could withstand multiple impacts from that size aircraft.