posted on Sep, 14 2010 @ 03:38 PM
Originally posted by technical difficulties
Falling for a period of a free fall is not the same as falling in free fall, unless you're implying that they detonated the building as it feel to
the ground, which is really pointless. see as it is, falling to the ground.
Who said anything about free-fall? Free-fall speed is irrelevant. No matter how fast the building fell, all four outer walls cannot end up on top of
the rest of the building from a natural collapse.
I'm surprised you didn't claim I said holograms...
Also, 9/11 denialists really have no right to tell anyone they're anything anything. Yes, we get it, no one has never seen a building collapse
from a fire started by falling debris from another building, but that doesn't mean you have to make things up about how it was demolished with top
secret explosives by a crack team of agents with no evidence to back it up. For a group called the Truth Movement, you guys sure do lie a lot. Maybe
if you guys weren't so dishonest, you would've gotten another investigation.
Jeez another OSer calling me a liar with nothing to back up their claim. Isn't that against T&C?
Who is making things up? All I did was show a picture of WTC 7, and then explain how controlled implosions work.' My only link was to
That is a Discovery Channel website, nothing to do with 9-11, or conspiracies.
If you did actual research as opposed to just going to websites that agree with you, you would know that.
Where did I post ANYTHING from a website that agrees with me? You mean the one above about how demolitions work? Maybe it's you that needs to do
some research and stop calling people liars.
Now do you want to address what I'm actually saying?