It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by technical difficulties
Falling for a period of a free fall is not the same as falling in free fall, unless you're implying that they detonated the building as it feel to the ground, which is really pointless. see as it is, falling to the ground.
Also, 9/11 denialists really have no right to tell anyone they're anything anything. Yes, we get it, no one has never seen a building collapse from a fire started by falling debris from another building, but that doesn't mean you have to make things up about how it was demolished with top secret explosives by a crack team of agents with no evidence to back it up. For a group called the Truth Movement, you guys sure do lie a lot. Maybe if you guys weren't so dishonest, you would've gotten another investigation.
If you did actual research as opposed to just going to websites that agree with you, you would know that.
Originally posted by GunzCoty
reply to post by Varemia
Sorry but you had to bring in WTC 7 and even the NIST report admits it was in free fall speed for about 8 stories (or floors).
And that makes it imposable to fall with anything in the way. There was no resistance for that (what was it 2 secs?) that means no soft/cold or hot steel. Nothing was in the way so unless there is some supernatural phenomenon that we do not know of then WTC7 was taking down with demolitions.
edit on 14-9-2010 by GunzCoty because: changed the to it