It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I want to marry Gretchen. LOL.

page: 2
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 31 2010 @ 06:25 PM
link   
reply to post by sweetliberty
 


Thanks sweetliberty on attempting to get them back on track.

I guess the SOP for those like Gibbs is avoid any debate.

I just like to pull people into the OP by the .lines. It is a standard media procedure. Grab them with the cover or .line, get them with the content.

I guess when the content scares them, or they have no answer, then-

baffle, becloud, befuddle, bewilder, cloud, complicate, conceal, confound, darken, fog, fuddle, muddle, obscure, perplex, puzzle, rattle, bloviate, obfuscate, etc etc etc.




posted on Aug, 31 2010 @ 06:26 PM
link   
OK, if we're just talking about "hotties" I'll see your Sarah Palin and raise you a Ruby Dhalla. Member of Parliament and a doctor.

BEAT THAT. Italians need not apply.



posted on Aug, 31 2010 @ 06:30 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 


No, the definition of ignoramus does mean an ignorant individual, but what was it's origon?

Just looked it up myself, yes I am sure she was being literal, as in using the literal creation of the word.

Was Ignoramus the first time this was used, I mean in regards to the source of the word.

I think it was actually an ingenious word play.

Wow, now she is even more sexy!



posted on Aug, 31 2010 @ 06:30 PM
link   
[edit on 31-8-2010 by LadySkadi]



posted on Aug, 31 2010 @ 06:32 PM
link   
reply to post by saltheart foamfollower
 



I did the tough job, now you are supposed to drink dang it


Sorry...i prefer Tang over republican stirred kool-aid.



posted on Aug, 31 2010 @ 06:36 PM
link   
reply to post by intrepid
 


Fine, I am .ing back to the news anchors but what the hey. I raise you Ruby Dhalla and bet Ainsley Earhardt..




posted on Aug, 31 2010 @ 06:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Snarf
 


Would a little fluoride or lithium help?



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 12:29 AM
link   
reply to post by saltheart foamfollower
 



Originally posted by saltheart foamfollower
Interviewing Goebbels, erm I mean Gibbs, ...
Damn, she kicked Goebbels, erm I mean Gibbs, right square in the LIE!




You will not alter political candidate names or party affiliations in order to insult or deride the opposition.
Source: Terms and Conditions




Gretchen Carlson Is Just Like The President!





[edit on 7-9-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 12:38 AM
link   
reply to post by Esoteric Teacher
 


Sorry, is Goebbels, erm I mean Gibbs a candidate for something?

Did I mention a political party?

Thought not.

Oh and I trash both the progressive parties, you know the democrats and the republicans are just a two .ed snake filled with progressive communists don't you?

Constitutional Libertarian here.

I believe in social freedoms and economic freedoms.

I believe in individual rights and property rights. You know, kinda like the founders of this country. You know, kinda like the Constitution lays out. You know, THE LAW of the LAND.

I believe we should be a country of LAWS, not men or ideologies.

Bu bye.



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 12:43 AM
link   
reply to post by saltheart foamfollower
 


I like that woman.. One of the few I like on Fox News.

Second line.



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 12:45 AM
link   
reply to post by saltheart foamfollower
 




ooooooooh, an ignoramus, eh!

nyuck nyuck!

clonk!

ow ow ow ow o w ow !

wait a minute!

pick two!


boink!

hey! leave him alone!

oh yea?....

slap!

hey moe!








posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 12:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by saltheart foamfollower

I believe we should be a country of LAWS, not men or ideologies.

Bu bye.


how many laws specifically do you believe in?

what is the exact number of laws you believe in?

a number, please?


i'm not convinced you know what you believe in, to be honest with you.

you believe we should be a country of laws, then please share with us your knowledge concerning these mandatory expectations placed upon every member of society, and tell us how many laws are you supporting and in favor of?

hugs & kisses,
et

[edit on 7-9-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 01:11 AM
link   
reply to post by Esoteric Teacher
 


It is really quite simple.

As laid out in the Constitution and the Natural Law.

Look at my avatar, pretty much describes natural law.

There is over 600,000 statutes in the US now.

If the Supreme Court go together and wrote out every statute they could remember, taking say 6 months, they would not be able to write down 50,000.

So, whatever happened to the tenet, ignorance of the law is no excuse?

BUT, if you were to actually teach the citizenry that they have the right to LIFE, LIBERTY and PROPERTY and to do anyone harm or to infringe on another's right to LIFE, LIBERTY or PROPERTY, that tenet would still be valid.

The government was never meant to be able to protect the citizenry from their own stupidity and it cannot do it without infringing on our very freedom.

Succinct enough for you?

Oh and by the way.

Labor is not an income. Income is created when you make profit. When you trade your labor for currency or trade it for another service or commodity, no PROFIT hence no income is created. Therefore income taxation is unlawful according to the Constitution.

Property taxation is the unlawful seizure of property of an individual. As laid out in the bill of rights, NO seizure of property without JUST COMPENSATION.

I guess these two things are the real panty twisters the most in my eyes.



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 01:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by saltheart foamfollower

So, whatever happened to the tenet, ignorance of the law is no excuse?


It seems to me ignorance of the law is the law of the land. unless there is one who knows all the laws, and can abide by them all simultaneously in context.



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 01:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by SpectreDC
reply to post by saltheart foamfollower
 


Gretchen is an idiot and to want to marry her well...really dude, I think you could do better.

With that said, HONESTLY beating Gibbs in a debate is like racing someone with down syndrome in doing math problems.

I mean, Gretchen isn't smart but Gibbs? He's downright retarded.

[edit on 31-8-2010 by SpectreDC]


I agree 100%, I mean look at this screen grab... who debates cross-eyed?


We all know that Fox News is the last place to look for news, and everybody that works there is an idiot...



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 01:50 AM
link   
reply to post by imitator
 



looks like both to me.


so who rep morphs?



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 01:56 AM
link   
I see the standard liberal progressive technique is coming to bear.

Attack, attack, attack.

I guess Goebbel, erm I mean Gibbs lies and obfuscation are just typical for propaganda ministers.

Oh well, if you cannot debate the subject, everyone knows the playbook.



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 02:06 AM
link   
reply to post by saltheart foamfollower
 


listen haltfarts foamflower ..erm... i mean saltheart foamswallower,
sorry about the attack attack attack play book. it is not good practice, and may be predictable, even preventable.

all apologies,
ass so tear ic tee shirt



"It took me about a year to start hating the victims of 9-11"
- Civil Rights Leader Glenn Beck
_____________________________________

is Gretchen Carlson pretty and smart?

do you want to debate marriage with her on ATS?

let's debate marrying Gretchen

[edit on 7-9-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 03:19 AM
link   
reply to post by intrepid
 


If we are going to talk about hot reporters...



Abbie Boudreau YUM!



posted on Sep, 7 2010 @ 03:40 AM
link   
reply to post by whatukno
 


let's not forget the international news scene....




[edit on 7-9-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join