 |
reply posted on 15-11-2006 @ 04:51 AM by PisTonZOR
|
Silly question. I am not a big military aircraft buff.
How exactly does speed influence exhaustion?
I don't understand.
Maybe the blackbird was a beast to fly, in all the space suit equipments and the rush of flying it. And the g forces in the sr-71 wouldn't be
constantly 3g's.
Mach 25 is almost orbital velocity right? Right. That means this 'space plane' will be in space allot of the time, pulling 0g's. Re-entering would
be like the space shuttle. They don't faint when re-entering, and I don't think they're even wearing g suits.
Can someone clear this up for me?
Thanks.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-11-2006 @ 08:58 AM by Ghost01
|
Speculative Question: What if they are 2 unrealted Programs?
We all KNOW there is more the one Black Program going on at a time.
What if:
- Aroura exists, but has Nothing to do with Hypersonic aircraft.
And
- A hypersonic spylane exists, but was NEVER connected to Aroura in Any way.
Just because both exist, doesn't mean they are the SAME Program! Here's an example:
There was a classified Program in the 1980's called Tacit Blue, and in the Earily 80's there was also a Top Secret Stealth Fighter. However we
now know that the F-117 Stealth Fighter was called Senior Trend, and was not connected to Northrop's Tacit Blue. Who's to say Aroura and the
Hypersonic Aircraft in Nevada aren't the same thing?
Tim
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-1-2007 @ 12:50 PM by danwild6
|
Has anyone considered the possibility that the Aurora may be equipt with a MIPCC enhanced engine? Similar in concept to Darpa's
Rascal project. It states that such an engine could
operate at speeds up to Mach 6. Lets say equip a mother vehicle similar to the XB-70 Super Valkeryie with such an engine. Mount a craft similar to the
X-20 Dynasoar on the mothership once the motherships reaches space(sub-orbital in this case)it launches its payload(the X-20)for a orbital flyover.
Any thoughts?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-1-2007 @ 05:32 AM by Ghost01
|
Originally posted by PisTonZOR
Silly question. I am not a big military aircraft buff.
How exactly does speed influence exhaustion?
Can someone clear this up for me?
Thanks. 
I'm not exactally sure, but if you watch the Video SR-71 Blackbird: The Secret Vigil From Avation Week and Space Technology, one of the SR-71
pilots says:
I've flown a 26 1/2 hour mission in a B-52 and that's as exhausting as a 4 hour mission in the SR-71.

I'm assuming an SR pilot would know what he's talking about. Exactally why this is, I don't know. Maybe it requires more intense concentration to
monitor the flight, because everything happens so much faster.
Tim
[edit on 23-1-2007 by Ghost01]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-1-2007 @ 10:01 PM by GOV.PILOT08
|
AURORA
THE AURORA IS VERY REAL. THEY TEST FLEW IT IN 1952.
Mod Note: All Caps – Please Review This Link.
[edit on 30/1/2007 by Mirthful Me]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-1-2007 @ 10:09 PM by GOV.PILOT08
|
THE SR-71 BLACKBIRD FLIES 3 MILES (15,840 FEET) BELOW THE STRATOSPHERE, THUS IT IS A SUB SPACE AIRCRAFT.
Mod Note: All Caps – Please Review This Link.
[edit on 30/1/2007 by Mirthful Me]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-1-2007 @ 11:15 PM by Jbird
|
Is that all you can tell us?
Also, just some friendly advice-
You may want to check #5 on this page
www.abovetopsecret.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-1-2007 @ 12:45 AM by PisTonZOR
|
 Maybe it requires more intense concentration to monitor the flight, because everything happens so much faster. 
Probably. I did 40 laps in a Go-kart, and I was pretty much exhausted afterwars.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-1-2007 @ 04:26 AM by Ghost01
|
Your date is Off!
Originally posted by GOV.PILOT08
THE AURORA IS VERY REAL. THEY TEST FLEW IT IN 1952.
[edit on 30/1/2007 by Mirthful Me] 
No offense, but I doubt this is correct! The Aroura is supposed to be the sucessor to the SR-71 Blackbird, which was ironically supposed to replace
the U-2 Spyplane. Your date would place the first fight of Aurora 3 YEARS before the U-2 was built.
How exactly did the Blackbird's sucessor fly 3 Years before the U-2? 
No offense, but your date is WAY off the mark!
Tim
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-2-2007 @ 04:36 PM by toga112
|
Originally posted by WestPoint23
you know what would be funny if the aurora really dosent exist. 
But it doesn't exist. Whats your point?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-2-2007 @ 05:04 PM by Mondogiwa
|
Toga,
how do you know this??? You have anything that would be evidence one way or the other at all?? I am open to either possibility but would love to
hear your perspective and reasons why you hold that perspective!!??
Thanks, Mondo
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-3-2007 @ 03:02 PM by TeslaandLyne
|
For all those who think the Aurora exists and would
like to consider the following propulsion system
by checking just three patents that evolved into
a plasma thrustor, please consider looking at the following:
A so called plasma thrustor for a satellite:
Patent 06029438
Yes small but you will not see patent a full sized motor for an aircraft,
the government likes to develop it own devices over using a patent.
I found the above referenced here:
Patent 06271614
The above was referenced here, perhaps to root:
Patent 0051234
Patent look up might be free at this site:
www.delphion.com...
Plasma just another name for current which of coarse must be
powerful in the case of air flight.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-3-2007 @ 03:11 PM by TeslaandLyne
|
Originally posted by Ghost01
Originally posted by GOV.PILOT08
THE AURORA IS VERY REAL. THEY TEST FLEW IT IN 1952.
[edit on 30/1/2007 by Mirthful Me] 
No offense, but I doubt this is correct! The Aroura is supposed to be the sucessor to the SR-71 Blackbird, which was ironically supposed to replace
the U-2 Spyplane. Your date would place the first fight of Aurora 3 YEARS before the U-2 was built.
How exactly did the Blackbird's sucessor fly 3 Years before the U-2? 
No offense, but your date is WAY off the mark!
Tim 
If the Aurora is actually a triangle UFO craft he might be right since development may have started after 1945.
One book on UFOs 1945-1995 did have a triangle UFO sited in the 40s.
So no offense to both of you.
You both are WAY WAY not with the plasma craft development.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-3-2007 @ 05:59 AM by brotherthebig
|
Aurora and lunar eclipse
Hi,
This video www.burnleytoday.co.uk... shows the recent lunar eclipse and a jet plane, could that be
Aurora? Any information on identical contrails?
More on Aurora, maybe a Northrop development, in this thread www.abovetopsecret.com... . You will find there the
Sweetman online book about Aurora, which will help to reply to some, but not all, questions raised here.
brotherthebig.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-3-2007 @ 06:52 AM by Zaphod58
|
That looks like an airliner in the video. I can see what looks like a cylindrical fuselage, and a pair of wings to the side.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-3-2007 @ 12:17 PM by waynos
|
Burnley they say? I reckon thats a 747 over Manchester Airport.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-3-2007 @ 08:50 PM by bigfatfurrytexan
|
There is not a single doubt in my mind that the object in that picture is a commercial airliner taking off. If it were some "secret" jet, the
agency responsiblr for its secrecy is totally inept.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2007 @ 05:01 AM by Ghost01
|
Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
If the Aurora is actually a triangle UFO craft he might be right since development may have started after 1945.
One book on UFOs 1945-1995 did have a triangle UFO sited in the 40s.

Wouldn't it be more Reasonable to think that may have been a X-Plane then a spy plane, Simular to how the X-1 was built to study supersonic flight.
It makes more sense to spend 50 years on a Research Program, than 50 years developing an operational system.
Tim
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2007 @ 12:05 PM by damajikninja
|
image source: http://content.pimp-my-profile.com/userpics/funny_pictures/69_new.jpg
I'm about 99% sure this is just photoshopped... Wonder if that's what the Aroura looks like when parked on the tarmac. Funny to look at!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2007 @ 03:36 PM by brotherthebig
|
More Aurora in Manchester
Hi,
Thank you for your comments.
There are some Aurora, Halo or other crafts sightings in the Manchester area:
www.fas.org...
robocat.users.btopenworld.com...
www.sacred-texts.com...
www.area51zone.com...
www.ufos-aliens.co.uk...
brotherthebig.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |