This topic is in the Aircraft Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


The Aurora Top-Secret Hypersonic Spy Plane


<<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>



reply posted on 15-11-2006 @ 04:51 AM by PisTonZOR


Silly question. I am not a big military aircraft buff.

How exactly does speed influence exhaustion?

I don't understand.

Maybe the blackbird was a beast to fly, in all the space suit equipments and the rush of flying it. And the g forces in the sr-71 wouldn't be constantly 3g's.

Mach 25 is almost orbital velocity right? Right. That means this 'space plane' will be in space allot of the time, pulling 0g's. Re-entering would be like the space shuttle. They don't faint when re-entering, and I don't think they're even wearing g suits.

Can someone clear this up for me?

Thanks.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-11-2006 @ 08:58 AM by Ghost01

Speculative Question: What if they are 2 unrealted Programs?

We all KNOW there is more the one Black Program going on at a time.

What if:

- Aroura exists, but has Nothing to do with Hypersonic aircraft.

And

- A hypersonic spylane exists, but was NEVER connected to Aroura in Any way.

Just because both exist, doesn't mean they are the SAME Program! Here's an example:

There was a classified Program in the 1980's called Tacit Blue, and in the Earily 80's there was also a Top Secret Stealth Fighter. However we now know that the F-117 Stealth Fighter was called Senior Trend, and was not connected to Northrop's Tacit Blue. Who's to say Aroura and the Hypersonic Aircraft in Nevada aren't the same thing?

Tim



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-1-2007 @ 12:50 PM by danwild6


Has anyone considered the possibility that the Aurora may be equipt with a MIPCC enhanced engine? Similar in concept to Darpa's Rascal project. It states that such an engine could operate at speeds up to Mach 6. Lets say equip a mother vehicle similar to the XB-70 Super Valkeryie with such an engine. Mount a craft similar to the X-20 Dynasoar on the mothership once the motherships reaches space(sub-orbital in this case)it launches its payload(the X-20)for a orbital flyover.

Any thoughts?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-1-2007 @ 05:32 AM by Ghost01



Originally posted by PisTonZOR
Silly question. I am not a big military aircraft buff.

How exactly does speed influence exhaustion?

Can someone clear this up for me?

Thanks.


I'm not exactally sure, but if you watch the Video SR-71 Blackbird: The Secret Vigil From Avation Week and Space Technology, one of the SR-71 pilots says:



I've flown a 26 1/2 hour mission in a B-52 and that's as exhausting as a 4 hour mission in the SR-71.



I'm assuming an SR pilot would know what he's talking about. Exactally why this is, I don't know. Maybe it requires more intense concentration to monitor the flight, because everything happens so much faster.

Tim

[edit on 23-1-2007 by Ghost01]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 30-1-2007 @ 10:01 PM by GOV.PILOT08

AURORA

THE AURORA IS VERY REAL. THEY TEST FLEW IT IN 1952.


Mod Note: All Caps – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 30/1/2007 by Mirthful Me]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 30-1-2007 @ 10:09 PM by GOV.PILOT08


THE SR-71 BLACKBIRD FLIES 3 MILES (15,840 FEET) BELOW THE STRATOSPHERE, THUS IT IS A SUB SPACE AIRCRAFT.

Mod Note: All Caps – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 30/1/2007 by Mirthful Me]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 30-1-2007 @ 11:15 PM by Jbird



Originally posted by GOV.PILOT08
THE AURORA IS VERY REAL. THEY TEST FLEW IT IN 1952.



Is that all you can tell us?


Also, just some friendly advice-
You may want to check #5 on this page

www.abovetopsecret.com...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 31-1-2007 @ 12:45 AM by PisTonZOR



Maybe it requires more intense concentration to monitor the flight, because everything happens so much faster.

Probably. I did 40 laps in a Go-kart, and I was pretty much exhausted afterwars.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 31-1-2007 @ 04:26 AM by Ghost01

Your date is Off!


Originally posted by GOV.PILOT08
THE AURORA IS VERY REAL. THEY TEST FLEW IT IN 1952.


[edit on 30/1/2007 by Mirthful Me]


No offense, but I doubt this is correct! The Aroura is supposed to be the sucessor to the SR-71 Blackbird, which was ironically supposed to replace the U-2 Spyplane. Your date would place the first fight of Aurora 3 YEARS before the U-2 was built.

How exactly did the Blackbird's sucessor fly 3 Years before the U-2?

No offense, but your date is WAY off the mark!

Tim



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-2-2007 @ 04:36 PM by toga112



Originally posted by WestPoint23
you know what would be funny if the aurora really dosent exist.


But it doesn't exist. Whats your point?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-2-2007 @ 05:04 PM by Mondogiwa


Toga,

how do you know this??? You have anything that would be evidence one way or the other at all?? I am open to either possibility but would love to hear your perspective and reasons why you hold that perspective!!??

Thanks, Mondo



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-3-2007 @ 03:02 PM by TeslaandLyne


For all those who think the Aurora exists and would
like to consider the following propulsion system
by checking just three patents that evolved into
a plasma thrustor, please consider looking at the following:

A so called plasma thrustor for a satellite:
Patent 06029438

Yes small but you will not see patent a full sized motor for an aircraft,
the government likes to develop it own devices over using a patent.

I found the above referenced here:
Patent 06271614

The above was referenced here, perhaps to root:
Patent 0051234

Patent look up might be free at this site:

www.delphion.com...

Plasma just another name for current which of coarse must be
powerful in the case of air flight.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-3-2007 @ 03:11 PM by TeslaandLyne



Originally posted by Ghost01

Originally posted by GOV.PILOT08
THE AURORA IS VERY REAL. THEY TEST FLEW IT IN 1952.


[edit on 30/1/2007 by Mirthful Me]


No offense, but I doubt this is correct! The Aroura is supposed to be the sucessor to the SR-71 Blackbird, which was ironically supposed to replace the U-2 Spyplane. Your date would place the first fight of Aurora 3 YEARS before the U-2 was built.

How exactly did the Blackbird's sucessor fly 3 Years before the U-2?

No offense, but your date is WAY off the mark!

Tim



If the Aurora is actually a triangle UFO craft he might be right since development may have started after 1945.

One book on UFOs 1945-1995 did have a triangle UFO sited in the 40s.


So no offense to both of you.

You both are WAY WAY not with the plasma craft development.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-3-2007 @ 05:59 AM by brotherthebig

Aurora and lunar eclipse

Hi,

This video www.burnleytoday.co.uk... shows the recent lunar eclipse and a jet plane, could that be Aurora? Any information on identical contrails?

More on Aurora, maybe a Northrop development, in this thread www.abovetopsecret.com... . You will find there the Sweetman online book about Aurora, which will help to reply to some, but not all, questions raised here.

brotherthebig.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-3-2007 @ 06:52 AM by Zaphod58


That looks like an airliner in the video. I can see what looks like a cylindrical fuselage, and a pair of wings to the side.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-3-2007 @ 12:17 PM by waynos


Burnley they say? I reckon thats a 747 over Manchester Airport.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-3-2007 @ 08:50 PM by bigfatfurrytexan


There is not a single doubt in my mind that the object in that picture is a commercial airliner taking off. If it were some "secret" jet, the agency responsiblr for its secrecy is totally inept.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-3-2007 @ 05:01 AM by Ghost01



Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
If the Aurora is actually a triangle UFO craft he might be right since development may have started after 1945.

One book on UFOs 1945-1995 did have a triangle UFO sited in the 40s.



Wouldn't it be more Reasonable to think that may have been a X-Plane then a spy plane, Simular to how the X-1 was built to study supersonic flight. It makes more sense to spend 50 years on a Research Program, than 50 years developing an operational system.

Tim



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-3-2007 @ 12:05 PM by damajikninja


image source: http://content.pimp-my-profile.com/userpics/funny_pictures/69_new.jpg


I'm about 99% sure this is just photoshopped... Wonder if that's what the Aroura looks like when parked on the tarmac. Funny to look at!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-3-2007 @ 03:36 PM by brotherthebig

More Aurora in Manchester

Hi,

Thank you for your comments.

There are some Aurora, Halo or other crafts sightings in the Manchester area:
www.fas.org...
robocat.users.btopenworld.com...
www.sacred-texts.com...
www.area51zone.com...
www.ufos-aliens.co.uk...

brotherthebig.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:















































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.012 seconds
Page processed in 0.128 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread