The Aurora Top-Secret Hypersonic Spy Plane

page: 5
17
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 15 2006 @ 04:51 AM
link   
Silly question. I am not a big military aircraft buff.

How exactly does speed influence exhaustion?

I don't understand.

Maybe the blackbird was a beast to fly, in all the space suit equipments and the rush of flying it. And the g forces in the sr-71 wouldn't be constantly 3g's.

Mach 25 is almost orbital velocity right? Right. That means this 'space plane' will be in space allot of the time, pulling 0g's. Re-entering would be like the space shuttle. They don't faint when re-entering, and I don't think they're even wearing g suits.

Can someone clear this up for me?

Thanks.




posted on Nov, 15 2006 @ 08:58 AM
link   
We all KNOW there is more the one Black Program going on at a time.

What if:

- Aroura exists, but has Nothing to do with Hypersonic aircraft.

And

- A hypersonic spylane exists, but was NEVER connected to Aroura in Any way.

Just because both exist, doesn't mean they are the SAME Program! Here's an example:

There was a classified Program in the 1980's called Tacit Blue, and in the Earily 80's there was also a Top Secret Stealth Fighter. However we now know that the F-117 Stealth Fighter was called Senior Trend, and was not connected to Northrop's Tacit Blue. Who's to say Aroura and the Hypersonic Aircraft in Nevada aren't the same thing?

Tim



posted on Jan, 14 2007 @ 12:50 PM
link   
Has anyone considered the possibility that the Aurora may be equipt with a MIPCC enhanced engine? Similar in concept to Darpa's Rascal project. It states that such an engine could operate at speeds up to Mach 6. Lets say equip a mother vehicle similar to the XB-70 Super Valkeryie with such an engine. Mount a craft similar to the X-20 Dynasoar on the mothership once the motherships reaches space(sub-orbital in this case)it launches its payload(the X-20)for a orbital flyover.

Any thoughts?



posted on Jan, 23 2007 @ 05:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by PisTonZOR
Silly question. I am not a big military aircraft buff.

How exactly does speed influence exhaustion?

Can someone clear this up for me?

Thanks.


I'm not exactally sure, but if you watch the Video SR-71 Blackbird: The Secret Vigil From Avation Week and Space Technology, one of the SR-71 pilots says:



I've flown a 26 1/2 hour mission in a B-52 and that's as exhausting as a 4 hour mission in the SR-71.


I'm assuming an SR pilot would know what he's talking about. Exactally why this is, I don't know. Maybe it requires more intense concentration to monitor the flight, because everything happens so much faster.

Tim

[edit on 23-1-2007 by Ghost01]



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 10:01 PM
link   
THE AURORA IS VERY REAL. THEY TEST FLEW IT IN 1952.


Mod Note: All Caps – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 30/1/2007 by Mirthful Me]



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 10:09 PM
link   
THE SR-71 BLACKBIRD FLIES 3 MILES (15,840 FEET) BELOW THE STRATOSPHERE, THUS IT IS A SUB SPACE AIRCRAFT.


Mod Note: All Caps – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 30/1/2007 by Mirthful Me]



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 11:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by GOV.PILOT08
THE AURORA IS VERY REAL. THEY TEST FLEW IT IN 1952.


Is that all you can tell us?


Also, just some friendly advice-
You may want to check #5 on this page


www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 12:45 AM
link   

Maybe it requires more intense concentration to monitor the flight, because everything happens so much faster.

Probably. I did 40 laps in a Go-kart, and I was pretty much exhausted afterwars.



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 04:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by GOV.PILOT08
THE AURORA IS VERY REAL. THEY TEST FLEW IT IN 1952.


[edit on 30/1/2007 by Mirthful Me]


No offense, but I doubt this is correct! The Aroura is supposed to be the sucessor to the SR-71 Blackbird, which was ironically supposed to replace the U-2 Spyplane. Your date would place the first fight of Aurora 3 YEARS before the U-2 was built.

How exactly did the Blackbird's sucessor fly 3 Years before the U-2?


No offense, but your date is WAY off the mark!

Tim



posted on Feb, 8 2007 @ 04:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by WestPoint23
you know what would be funny if the aurora really dosent exist.


But it doesn't exist. Whats your point?



posted on Feb, 8 2007 @ 05:04 PM
link   
Toga,

how do you know this??? You have anything that would be evidence one way or the other at all?? I am open to either possibility but would love to hear your perspective and reasons why you hold that perspective!!??

Thanks, Mondo



posted on Mar, 2 2007 @ 03:02 PM
link   
For all those who think the Aurora exists and would
like to consider the following propulsion system
by checking just three patents that evolved into
a plasma thrustor, please consider looking at the following:

A so called plasma thrustor for a satellite:
Patent 06029438

Yes small but you will not see patent a full sized motor for an aircraft,
the government likes to develop it own devices over using a patent.

I found the above referenced here:
Patent 06271614

The above was referenced here, perhaps to root:
Patent 0051234

Patent look up might be free at this site:

www.delphion.com...

Plasma just another name for current which of coarse must be
powerful in the case of air flight.



posted on Mar, 2 2007 @ 03:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ghost01

Originally posted by GOV.PILOT08
THE AURORA IS VERY REAL. THEY TEST FLEW IT IN 1952.


[edit on 30/1/2007 by Mirthful Me]


No offense, but I doubt this is correct! The Aroura is supposed to be the sucessor to the SR-71 Blackbird, which was ironically supposed to replace the U-2 Spyplane. Your date would place the first fight of Aurora 3 YEARS before the U-2 was built.

How exactly did the Blackbird's sucessor fly 3 Years before the U-2?


No offense, but your date is WAY off the mark!

Tim



If the Aurora is actually a triangle UFO craft he might be right since development may have started after 1945.

One book on UFOs 1945-1995 did have a triangle UFO sited in the 40s.


So no offense to both of you.

You both are WAY WAY not with the plasma craft development.



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 05:59 AM
link   
Hi,


This video www.burnleytoday.co.uk... shows the recent lunar eclipse and a jet plane, could that be Aurora? Any information on identical contrails?

More on Aurora, maybe a Northrop development, in this thread www.abovetopsecret.com... . You will find there the Sweetman online book about Aurora, which will help to reply to some, but not all, questions raised here.

brotherthebig.



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 06:52 AM
link   
That looks like an airliner in the video. I can see what looks like a cylindrical fuselage, and a pair of wings to the side.



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 12:17 PM
link   
Burnley they say? I reckon thats a 747 over Manchester Airport.



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 08:50 PM
link   
There is not a single doubt in my mind that the object in that picture is a commercial airliner taking off. If it were some "secret" jet, the agency responsiblr for its secrecy is totally inept.



posted on Mar, 27 2007 @ 05:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
If the Aurora is actually a triangle UFO craft he might be right since development may have started after 1945.

One book on UFOs 1945-1995 did have a triangle UFO sited in the 40s.


Wouldn't it be more Reasonable to think that may have been a X-Plane then a spy plane, Simular to how the X-1 was built to study supersonic flight. It makes more sense to spend 50 years on a Research Program, than 50 years developing an operational system.

Tim



posted on Mar, 27 2007 @ 12:05 PM
link   


I'm about 99% sure this is just photoshopped... Wonder if that's what the Aroura looks like when parked on the tarmac. Funny to look at!



posted on Mar, 27 2007 @ 03:36 PM
link   
Hi,

Thank you for your comments.

There are some Aurora, Halo or other crafts sightings in the Manchester area:
www.fas.org...
robocat.users.btopenworld.com...
www.sacred-texts.com...
www.area51zone.com...
www.ufos-aliens.co.uk...

brotherthebig.





new topics
top topics
 
17
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join


Haters, Bigots, Partisan Trolls, Propaganda Hacks, Racists, and LOL-tards: Time To Move On.
read more: Community Announcement re: Decorum