The Aurora Top-Secret Hypersonic Spy Plane, page 17
Pages: <<  14    15    16    17  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times


reply posted on 6-1-2010 @ 11:20 AM by LSWONE
reply to post by randyvs



And that's in 93! Imagine what they have flying around now a days. Since you are in Apple Valley, you might have some luck looking up at night from time to time.


reply posted on 26-6-2010 @ 08:52 PM by SneekMatrix
reply to post by nobody67



The plane uses cryogenic fuel "Liquid Methane" coupled with a superconducting magnetic field. The air-stream at mach 10-12 would become highly charged as it comes into contact/vicinity with the aircraft's airframe - special or exotic material can therefore use this to deflect the airflow over the aircraft with minimal or no air resistance - this is what i assume to be the answer to hypersonic flight - any residual airflow can be channeled to the aircraft's engine intake. Since an aeroplane's air speed is directly proportional to its thrust / drag, removing any drag will significantly increase airspeed.

To highlight this phenomena - trying creating an electric field near to a candles flame - the flame will be attracted to the electric field because it has positively charged particle, reverse the field polarity an the flame is repelled.


reply posted on 26-6-2010 @ 09:15 PM by SneekMatrix
reply to post by RichardPrice



The space shuttle has the aerodynamic profile of an elephant on steroids. It could not possibly sustain mach 20 in prolonged flight over more than a matter of minutes before the aerodynamic drag would tear it apart. A Hypersonic aircraft using todays i.e circa 2000-2010 technology could sustain Mach 20 indefinitely. The only limitation being fuel. Who would want this technology? Practically everyone since the Wright brothers flew the length of a football field and stunned the world. We live in an age of curiosity and our only boundaries are our imaginations. Aurora has existed an still exists as a hypersonic test bed for the X43 and has practical relevance too. There will come a time when an aircraft will launch carrying passengers above the stratosphere at Mach 20 from London to Los Angeles in 1hr 30 mins then onward to Sydney then back to London in less time than it takes a 747 to go from London to New York.



reply posted on 11-4-2011 @ 05:47 PM by JeffHunt3r
reply to post by SneekMatrix



thats pretty crazy a craft that can travel that fast in such a short time but i think when alien crafts are in our atmosphere, they use the earths magnetic fields to hover over it and repel away from it diagonally to move left to right. basically someday we wont need much fuel to get around im hoping sooner than later


reply posted on 16-8-2011 @ 03:20 AM by turbine
reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com
Well all information if you look at it there is a high possibility that the aircraft is actually all electric partly because of the heat you can actually convert heat to the power plus add a piece that enhances amount of power produced and allow higher possible speeds with a lower amount of power usage and of course there is the design if it uses heat and a no friction design would still work because it could use sunlight to charge but also moonlight the other is a magnetic generator that allows several million joules of electrical energy to enter the electrical system you can also use the heat of the sun during daylight which if it could go in space could create an energy buffer but with an energy cell to store all of the electrical energy in response to why it can be silent and hover would be anti grav
[more


reply posted on 21-9-2011 @ 11:24 AM by BOSSI
reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com



Interesting post on the Aurora project. However, I am understanding that this aircraft is capable of around Mach 11 or roughly 8,000 mph. In other words in could travel from L.A to New York in about 10 minutes. Whether or not this is true is still "secret".



reply posted on 8-2-2012 @ 05:29 PM by googlebomber1
reply to post by waynos


[color=Blue]The A-12/SR-71 spy plane was kept secret for years. Even when Johnson announced it in 1964, it was still very secret. The Air Force or CIA (which ever one operates the plane) can keep things secret for a long time, especially if it is the CIA. They have kept spy satellites in the past secret for many years, and there are still many denied or classified spy satellites up there. There is a need for spy planes even with spy satellites. Satellites take as long as six or more hours to put into proper orbit to fly over a target, while a spy plane can get there, especially a very fast one like the Aurora, can get there in only a few hours, and also, satellites are easy to track and to know when they will fly over, while planes are not. Even through the U.S.still has the U2 spy plane operating, it can't go to deep into enemy airspace, and that is where many of the valuable targets are. All of this evidence points to the existence of the Aurora spy plane.[/color]


reply posted on 9-2-2012 @ 03:57 AM by waynos
reply to post by googlebomber1



It's development and it's performance details were kept secret, not its existence. Taken in the context of the times this was a quite common approach, though the secrecy of the Blackbird family was heightened, it was far from unique. I even have books in which the performance of the Blackburn Buccaneer, just as one example, which was a standard attack aircraft of the RN and not a spy plane at all, is classified, as are several other types. As you say, it's existence was announced in 1964, this was also the year it first flew!

So there is no indication in the story of he Blackbird of anything to do with whether or not Aurora exists.

There might well be a need for an Aurora type aircraft, but that doesn't mean there is one. Where is the evidence?
edit on 9-2-2012 by waynos because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 9-2-2012 @ 11:57 PM by Shugo
reply to post by googlebomber1



By definition of travel it wouldn't take hardly any less time to get a spyplane of hypersonic nature such as the Aurora specifications to the target destination. Why do this when you can utilize the use of high altitude unmaned drones which can be launched closer and be over the target in as little as an hour?

I would like to point out Aurora's powerplant would have had the plane at roughly Mach 5, and that it was not an S/VTOL aircraft. This hinders it's range as far as time effectiveness immensely.
Pages: <<  14    15    16    17  >>    ^^TOP^^



In Case Of Videos Of Flying People
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags
First flight for \'flapless\' plane - the Evolution of Aviation
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags
F22 mishap or more that meeets the eye?
  Posted 4 days ago with 4 member flags
Boeing X-37 and X-40 - the ultimate history
  Posted 8 days ago with 3 member flags
Its a bird, its a plane, no its a ....
  Posted 17 days ago with 0 member flags