It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by autowrench
The problem with claims like this is that with a topic this religiously significant there will never be a conclusion one way or the other. Even if it was tested by hardcore atheist archeologists the chances are still good that some religious group would claim bias or tampering.
It's just like the Shroud of Turin and the Star Child skull, you can test it a thousand times and no matter what the results so some will choose to believe or disbelieve based on personal preference rather than fact.
If this were legitimate it would be great, since it would prove that Jesus both existed and was an ordinary man who did not rise from the dead. Of course that would do little to dissuade believers.
Originally posted by leira7
Or so you think. The Royal Family claims to be of the bloodline, but I assure you, they do not have The Grail, if they did, they would act like children of Abraham! Children of God, The Mother, The Father, The Creators of The Universe that altogether birthed us! Those Royals don't sound like Jesus, and they sure in the heck don't act like him either!
What better way to get people to hate The Truth (that is Love) than to orchestrate a theology that says tyrants are "God's Chosen Ones?"
Love thy neighbor, turn the other cheek, Jesus spoke a message of Forgiveness above all. Now ask yourself, really: Who are these so-called Royals? I say, Children of the Devil.
Originally posted by NurseB
Maybe he will rise again.. as a clone!
This may be a false dichotomy. I'm not sure if any of these claims are true.
Originally posted by monkcaw
From what I gather the OP is supporting two claims:
1. That Jesus' ossuary was found in 1980 and...
2. That a roman family called Piso fabricated the entire New Testament essentially making Jesus a fictional character that never existed.
So naturally, at least one of these claims must be false because Jesus cannot be dead and buried if he was a created fiction. So which is it?
The Scriptures teach that 40 days after His resurrection, Jesus, in miraculous fashion, physically ascended (was lifted off the ground and began floating upward) to return to the glory of His Father and sit down at his right hand. This was a visible event, witnessed by His disciples on Mt. Olivet outside of Jerusalem.
Originally posted by monkcaw
From what I gather the OP is supporting two claims:
1. That Jesus' ossuary was found in 1980 and...
2. That a roman family called Piso fabricated the entire New Testament essentially making Jesus a fictional character that never existed.
So naturally, at least one of these claims must be false because Jesus cannot be dead and buried if he was a created fiction. So which is it?
Originally posted by christianpatrick
reply to post by autowrench
Autowrench, I am very interested in the Montauk stories. I don't know where to find out anything about them. I've googled, but there isn't much there. Can you please give us the names of some of the books, or if it is not within the ATS guidelines to do so, then pm me? Thanks.
You don't think a boy's erection generating more power than the US military is capable of generating is far out?
Originally posted by autowrench
Originally posted by NurseB
Maybe he will rise again.. as a clone!
That is not so far out as one may think. If you have read into the Montauk books, according to them someone did go back in time and obtain a blood sample from Christ