It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Outrage over new invasive airport searches

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Aug, 31 2010 @ 05:26 AM
At the end of the day if you find the security checks an affront then don't fly. You are not being forced to get on a plane.

I fly quite alot and have no problem with security so long as it gets more efficient and speeds things up and is equally enforced without any farting about being politically correct to appease some whining "activist" or a head-to-toe covered Muslim.


posted on Aug, 31 2010 @ 05:52 AM
The man they were interviewing appears to have been damaged by the search. It seem that i order to cope with what happened to him he had to pretend that it wasn't real and that it didn't even occur in real-life (his words):

“If anybody ever groped me like that in real life, I would have punched them in their nose.”

But it was in real life.

And if he had punched their nose for their disgusting violation, he would have been subjected to torture. Men employed for the task would have used electrotorture devices on him and he would scream and maybe defecate in his throes of agony and terror.

So he pretended it wasn't real. That it wasn't "real life"

*Even glorious KGB had decency to take man to private place for the torture. In America, Security force torture man in public, for make example of him. KGB was not use 26 000 volts either, they were much nicer, using only car battery hooked to nipple.

Such nice guys.

posted on Aug, 31 2010 @ 05:55 AM

Originally posted by paraphi
At the end of the day if you find the security checks an affront then don't fly. You are not being forced to get on a plane.

The government shouldn't be running airline security.

If an airline wants the government to do so then let them and the statists can all fly that airline and go through the scanner and be yelled at by people on the government payroll ( a dream come true for them).

And if no airlines want government security then the statist can stay home or drive. This is the USA not the USSR.

posted on Aug, 31 2010 @ 06:09 AM
reply to post by paraphi

It's not the security checks that are the problem but the manner in which they are done and how they are done and what they are done with. If you'd ever looked in into these machines you'll find that they are dangerous (just look at any posting's on this site for info) and useless. At an airport alone there are many people who have access planes that never see these machines such as any cleaners, it's only passengers that go through them, so once again WHATS THE POINT! It has nothing to do with whinging at all and please do not bring in race to this discussion as it is totally irrelevant

posted on Aug, 31 2010 @ 06:31 AM

Originally posted by Britguy
The threat is obviously not as intense as they would have us believe!
On a recent business trip to Russia, I flew from Terminal 1 at London Heathrow and fully expected the full body scanner. There were none!

[edit on 31-8-2010 by Britguy]

they are bringing them in all over the country this year...every airport in GB will have them soon..and i will not fly home anymore to see my mother...ill drive but its obviously harder and i cant go in winter.....these things are ruining peoples lives..

posted on Aug, 31 2010 @ 06:37 AM
The Iraqification of the good ol US of A.

The state dept had to admit that the underwear bomber was deliberately put on a plane without a passport after they had been warned he was coming, because the witnesses wouldn't stay quiet. Then of course, right afterward Chertoff the ex DHS head, who was financially benefited by the airport scanners that had been ordered the year before, had an excellent reason to put them everywhere.
I mean why not fire the Israeli company that supposedly is the same one that has let ALL the famous hijackers through the airport security they provide?

After the scanner people where caught lying about the machines ability to save and transmit the nudie pix of the children that were put through it, the British government at least won't put under 18s through it as it violates their kiddie porn laws. After the Indian movie star signed a bunch of the pictures the public had been told the machins couldn't produce...
( sheepies are SO stupid!)

I wonder how many screeners are saving pictures of flying wives and children in the private collections that were not supposed to exist, but now we know most certainly do?
I'll bet they get a pretty good dollar from the "collectors"
( Remember Radar O' Riley ogling the nurses' chest x rays on MASH?)

Then there's the case of the airport screener who flipped out after being teased about his little wee wee so he laid a nice little beating on his co workers.
I wonder what they say about the nudies who have no inside knowledge or say?
Cavity search sir, we must be certain you aren't packing...

Well, that's the flyer's choice.
Wait till they start rewarding the googleized sheepies with a taser bracelet.
This will keep you safe sir.
heh heh heh

Yah volt! Papers Please!

Oh yeah, once they have your BIO metric scan tied to your ID they can track you with recognition software anywhere there are scanners or cameras just like the fingerprint matching systems the viewers cheer on CSI.

[edit on 31-8-2010 by Danbones]

top topics
<< 1   >>

log in