posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 09:46 PM
I realize that there are copyright issues and other legal aspects which need to be taken into account. But those aside, why even bother with any of
these sources if they all wind up being labeled as bologna?
This has been bothering me for quite a while now. It seems like every time I start reading an interesting thread, one which contains a link or quote
from another website, by the time I finish there's an abundance of responses stating how the source is one or more of the following: debunked, a
known hoax, cannot be trusted, fear-mongering, lacks information to back it up, too little critical thinking, propaganda, outright hogwash, and so on.
Ironically, it seems that many threads which link back to mainstream media websites more often than not don't get that treatment, and yet so many
people here will claim that the MSM cannot be believed and/or trusted. What makes MSM information any more credible than what can be read
[edit on 30-8-2010 by John_Q_Llama]