It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ron Paul calls out the liars... I meant Palin and Beck

page: 6
57
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 03:40 PM
link   
reply to post by ManBehindTheMask
 


A friend of mine called me and told me about this. I can't believe the lengths people will go through to destroy this man and for no other reason than they are bottom feeders.

www.observer.com...

Huffington Post contributor Beau Friedlander published a post to that site this morning offering $100,000 to anyone who could produce a sex tape of Glenn Beck




posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 03:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by Janky Red
 



Care to point out how ANYONE said ANY of those people were liberal?

Dont try to circumvent...........

The definition is pretty well straight forward......

No one said anything about Bush or anything else.........nice deflection tactic tho.......

Just because it may not fit what all the libs want it to , means nothing, because they like to distort the word into something different..........

You cant argue with the dictionary........well i guess you can but its futile




You started this quest for definition,

You and the Dictionary claim that neocons are liberal - I am playing your game



Reagan was the modern Great Great grandfather father of the national debt and this climate of deficit spending we now live with... Liberal spender, spending beyond the constraints of income -

Oh wait


Bush 1 is on there too.

W too...


Why

So is Obama

So in your words what constitutes a liberal besides being derogatory connotation?

Do these big spending Liberal conservatives have a quality that negates their liberal spending records sir???

tell us how that works



[edit on 30-8-2010 by Janky Red]

[edit on 30-8-2010 by Janky Red]



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 03:50 PM
link   
Has anyone ever noticed how the secular socialists never eat their own. When Slick Willie was attacking interns did the NOW attack him, no. When Harry Reid refered to Obama as not speaking with a "negro dialect" did the NAACP attack, no. Please realize the left has adopted the religion of secular socialism and all leftist groups are just individual churches within the same doctrine. For them to attack each other would be like the Methodists attacking the Baptists in a battle aginst Islam.

Therefore people that believe in limited government and individual freedom should put aside their differences with each other for the real agenda just as the left does. Beck although not adpoting the exact platform of Paul generally agrees on the basic premises and are vilified by the MSM so they must be doing something right, so let's not destroy each other from within. An extreme case, the KKK should not be totally thrown under the bus or any other fringe group if they fall under the limited government, individual liberty banner. I can assure you that Marxists,Nambla and other fringe groups of the left are not left out of the Secular socialist tent.

We are in battle with a very cohesive group on the left who can quickly dismiss trangressions as long as they maintain the the overall faith. If the Tea Party, Republicans,Libertarians etc. don't soon start adopting the same philosophy then I fear the socialists will win.



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 03:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Esoteric Teacher
 


You would be correct, however said Neocon in def 2 would have to have first been a LIBERAL

cheers



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 03:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Janky Red
 


no, I didnt give you a definition of LIBERAL i gave you the definition of NEOCON,

distort it however you like, its all deflection.........



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 03:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by billyjack
Has anyone ever noticed how the secular socialists never eat their own. When Slick Willie was attacking interns did the NOW attack him, no. When Harry Reid refered to Obama as not speaking with a "negro dialect" did the NAACP attack, no. Please realize the left has adopted the religion of secular socialism and all leftist groups are just individual churches within the same doctrine. For them to attack each other would be like the Methodists attacking the Baptists in a battle aginst Islam.

Therefore people that believe in limited government and individual freedom should put aside their differences with each other for the real agenda just as the left does. Beck although not adpoting the exact platform of Paul generally agrees on the basic premises and are vilified by the MSM so they must be doing something right, so let's not destroy each other from within. An extreme case, the KKK should not be totally thrown under the bus or any other fringe group if they fall under the limited government, individual liberty banner. I can assure you that Marxists,Nambla and other fringe groups of the left are not left out of the Secular socialist tent.

We are in battle with a very cohesive group on the left who can quickly dismiss trangressions as long as they maintain the the overall faith. If the Tea Party, Republicans,Libertarians etc. don't soon start adopting the same philosophy then I fear the socialists will win.


HELL if you cannot see that conservatives do the same you are too partisan...

It is the nature of a two party state-

Libertarians and Fundi gay haters caucusing together is the same difference. Burn Gays, don't do them drugs and cilvil Liberty unfettered by government in anyway
are hardly similar ideas, yet look at the GOP... The regressive tent is built up of the same sort of coalition, it is the nature of the two party state.

BTW people who wish for progress always win in the long run, if you will notice each generation is more liberal than the previous one...

I am going to polish my hammer and sharpen my sickle



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 04:00 PM
link   
reply to post by ljtg123
 


That is horrible, seriously?

Ill have to research that, if its true, then it just proves the theory that the liberal left will do ANYTHING to discredit people

Not their ideas, no no we wont debate that, we will try and bring them down in character first, just like how they like to use NAMES like "Neocon" and "racist" when they dont agree with someone , instead of debating w logic and reason.....

You know why? Because they know they are wrong



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 04:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by Janky Red
 


no, I didnt give you a definition of LIBERAL i gave you the definition of NEOCON,

distort it however you like, its all deflection.........


I know, all you do is deflect, thanks for being honest


isn't that neat that people who sell them selves as conservative are in fact liberal spenders? NEATO HUH???




posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 04:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by ljtg123
 


That is horrible, seriously?

Ill have to research that, if its true, then it just proves the theory that the liberal left will do ANYTHING to discredit people

Not their ideas, no no we wont debate that, we will try and bring them down in character first, just like how they like to use NAMES like "Neocon" and "racist" when they dont agree with someone , instead of debating w logic and reason.....

You know why? Because they know they are wrong


Like socialist, communist, terrorist lover, closeted muslim, usurper?

I always here liberals using those terms to discount other peoples views, thank god for the steadfast fortitude of conservative America!

[edit on 30-8-2010 by Janky Red]



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 04:16 PM
link   
reply to post by Janky Red
 


Are you kidding? Are you deliberately ignorant to the facts?

yes you ARE deflecting, i gave you teh definition of NEOCON and you took off in a totally different direction.....then accused ME of doing it.....nice.....but wont work....


Now this person comes up with something thats despicable , if true, and you go off on another tirade.....

Hmm, socialist and communist........if the man surrounds himself with people who are ADMITTEDLY BOTH, then what do you expect? If his policies mirror those of other socialist or communist countries what do you expect?

Its not like they are saying that stuff without merit , theres proof, and its in black and white......

Definitely not the same as offering a REWARD for a sex tape just to fling mud and SLANDER......

if you think thats the same thing then i should probably stop replying to you, because the common sense factor has gone out the window



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 04:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by Janky Red
 


Are you kidding? Are you deliberately ignorant to the facts?

yes you ARE deflecting, i gave you teh definition of NEOCON and you took off in a totally different direction.....then accused ME of doing it.....nice.....but wont work....


Now this person comes up with something thats despicable , if true, and you go off on another tirade.....

Hmm, socialist and communist........if the man surrounds himself with people who are ADMITTEDLY BOTH, then what do you expect? If his policies mirror those of other socialist or communist countries what do you expect?

Its not like they are saying that stuff without merit , theres proof, and its in black and white......

Definitely not the same as offering a REWARD for a sex tape just to fling mud and SLANDER......

if you think thats the same thing then i should probably stop replying to you, because the common sense factor has gone out the window


Well climb out the window and pick it up (see how that works?)

IT wont work because you are not willing to examine your perception

The equation is you gave a definition of neocon as liberal...

The George W Bush administration was the consummate Neocon administration, Neoconservatism which you equated with liberalism. Yes I expanded, this is a discussion board, are you the one who determines the realm of discussion?

You complained that liberals marginalize people with rhetorical weapon, I am only
showing you it works both ways.

If you recall the people who did not agree with Fascist GITMO where labeled terrorist lovers?

Or people who opposed the wars were labeled anti American?

So don't play the victim role here, all poop smells and everyone craps...



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 05:01 PM
link   
I'm not here to defend Glenn Beck but I have to make some comments about all the wing nuts making wild statements about the Restoring Honor rally.

I attended the rally with my wife because, as a former Naval Officer, Honor and Integrity are very import characteristics to me and they are in short supply in today's political climate. Everyone has their favorite straw man to hold up as the perfect example of Honor and Integrity and everyone else is slime as stated in one post in this thread which I flag as an integrity violation for not being honest.

By no means am I holding up Glenn Beck as the perfect example of Honor and Integrity because he freely admits that he is not perfect. Can the rest of you do that? It takes a humble person with Honor and Integrity to admit they are flawed and have lots of room to improve so at least give him that.

The Restoring Honor rally was part religious revival, honoring of veterans, honoring of the civil rights movement, and a history lesson all with a little humor. All the folks trying to say it was something else (like a tea party event) was not there and is just judging based on THEIR OWN prejudices and is not being honorable.

However having said that, I will say that there was a presence of many tea party militia groups and I feel this was actually a distraction and counter productive at the Restoring Honor rally. In the area where we watch the rally, there were two groups of about 15-20 members each.

They should have left their “don't tread on me” flags at home and brought the Stars and Strips. Observing many of these tea party militia groups, many had their own militia banners flying and to me this was more about “look at me look at me aren't we wonderful”.

One of the other main themes of the Restoring Honor rally was to observe how Dr. Martin Luther King made change happen through the practice of non violence and restraint. Dr. King preached taking the high road even when the “other side” was preaching hate and to never degrade to using violence as part of civil discourse.

Another interesting observation about the press coverage is that is was all about the competing rallies and which one had the largest attendance. Is it not a shame that they could not focus on the messages of each rally because it would have shown there was more in common between the rallies.

My last observation is one about the MLK rally. The President of SEIU-32BJ, which covers the D.C. Area, said those gathered at the Mall with Beck “represent angry white people and hate-mongering”.

Is this the spirit that should be present at a MLK rally when Dr. King preached to judge me by the content of my character and not the color of my skin? I was floored to hear at a MLK rally of someone judging me by the color of my skin.

Well that's about all I have to say. Bottom line is that it was a positive experience and those who say there are hidden and evil agendas at work should have attended the rally and experienced the positive environment.



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 06:04 PM
link   
Glenn Beck is a snake oil gold salesman marking up to 40% on his sales to the gullible. Sara Palin is (amongst many other things) a prophetess sent by God to cleanse the world of demonic powers.

Put them together and you have NUTS (which speaks volumes of the many Americans that like little children, follow them).



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 06:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by whatsup
Glenn Beck is a snake oil gold salesman marking up to 40% on his sales to the gullible. Sara Palin is (amongst many other things) a prophetess sent by God to cleanse the world of demonic powers.

Put them together and you have NUTS (which speaks volumes of the many Americans that like little children, follow them).



Hmmmm...I guess I would like to know what snake oil that GB is selling?

Anyone can throw generalize comments about these folks like you did but can you back it up with something more than your snake oil comment?

Let's take one snake oil product you think he is selling and talk about it?



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 06:36 PM
link   
i'm sick of the wealthy and rich, who can afford to pay 99% income tax and still be millionaires deciding what everyone else should do. someone should remind beck and palin that they aren't elected representitives of anybody and are just loudmouthed private citizens with no extra privilage or power and equal to the average homeless man as outlined in the constitution.



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 06:38 PM
link   
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 06:53 PM
link   
reply to post by saltheart foamfollower
 


How is it revisionist? it's direct quotes of the people. I truly think you need to research these matters a tad bit before assuming.

reply to post by mothershipzeta
 


Certainly. However, if it was an issue, that would be on the table of his solutions. Nobody here is saying it is right. But he still said it's on the table. Sorry, I would never put that on the table no matter how bad things got.

The question is not if he approves. It's if he said he would do it. The quote clearly shows that in a situation of such bad, he would chose that course of action. There in which in my problem with him. The fact he even considered it an option.

[edit on 30-8-2010 by Gorman91]



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 06:55 PM
link   
reply to post by randomname
 


ahh that was uncalled for completely, If you have nothing to contribute then please, dont post......

Glenn Beck and Palin have just as much voice as anyone else in this country, Im not a Palin supporter really, but i do like Glenn...

They have the right to assemble and the right to try and effect change if they want to....

You must not understand the constitution and what the founding fathers did for us......

Because what Palin and Glenn are doing, is EVERY Americans RIGHT and DUTY to do......

Assemble and effect change............get a clue



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 07:28 PM
link   
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


As an Australian looking in... How the hell can most Americans fall for this crap? This is unbelievable... What is going on overthere? Are you getting dumber? Is there something in the water? I saw the rally's and the speeches... How can so many be duded and the PTB still get away with it?

911 should have been the end of it all, but no, It got worse, and people still believe that it caused was Islamist. Bin Laden worked for the CIA... HELLO!! Is anyone home America?

Take the power back America... The smart Americans really need to help and show the not so smart Americans the truth and together you can take your country back, trust me when I say, the world will follow in your steps... For a truely free society, this needs to happen...



posted on Aug, 30 2010 @ 07:31 PM
link   
reply to post by ManBehindTheMask
 


You been duded pal, Glenn is A Fox News Goon... If you follow what he say's I pity you... Your still asleep at the wheel... Wake up and smell what your shovelling!!

[edit on 30/8/10 by andronaconda]



new topics




 
57
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join