When I was younger I was a rebel, I guess, which in some way led to me being a conspirator in some sorts. One issue I was against was censorship in
all manners. As I got older it became less of an issue since I don't approve of television, advertising, or commercial music, you can get what you
want to watch off of the internet without censorship. Censorship laws don't affect my life in any sort of manner. As a musician I'm a firm believer
of freedom of speech, and I'm very conservative in interpreting the constitution. Not conservative like the right wing neocons, but conservative by
definition. (I don't like dealing in absolutes like politics, I'm against any type of labeling your belief systems)
When looking back at the political debate of censorship specifically in music, the people for censorship have completely misinterpreted the
Constitution and made themselves look life fools. They take the first amendment and say that we don't have the right to say certain things that
offend certain people, and most of the time they're the ones saying that this is a Christian Nation based upon Christian Morals, but the same sources
of their interpretations are the same source of how our government is out of control. These individuals allow the government and mass media to make
monkeys out of them.
Let's take a look at the first amendment for reference:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or
of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I can get into great detail about the topics this amendment brings up, I can
go on forever about it. Espcially in the society we live in now, it is a lot different than in 1787. That being said the ones were and are
procensorship bring up that same point, but their interpretations are out of wack.
I'm going to use videos of debates over censorship from the 1980s when the issue of music censorship fired up.
A great proponent for freedom of speech was the late Frank Zappa. As one of the most creative musicians of all time, in my opinion, Frank is a very
intellectual person and he was one of the original proponents for no-censorship in music. I agree with his interpretation on the first amendent 100%.
He addressed the US Senate commerce, technology, and transportation committee against the PMRCs proposal to censor music.
Here is his testimony to the senate and a quote:
"The PMRC proposal is an ill-conceived piece of nonsense which fails to deliver any real benefits to children, infringes the civil liberties of
people who are not children, and promises to keep the courts busy for years dealing with the interpretational and enforcemental problems inherent in
the proposal's design. It is my understanding that, in law, First Amendment issues are decided with a preference for the least restrictive
alternative. In this context, the PMRC's demands are the equivalent of treating dandruff by decapitation ... The establishment of a rating system,
voluntary or otherwise, opens the door to an endless parade of moral quality control programs based on things certain Christians do not like. What if
the next bunch of Washington wives demands a large yellow "J" on all material written or performed by Jews, in order to save helpless children from
exposure to concealed Zionist doctrine?"
Here is frank on crossfire with washington times journalist john holton. I suggest watching these videos if you have the
time, if not at least skim through them. Frank makes a great example of how a level headed individual portrays himself
and interpres law, and how mainstream journalists interpret things for their own political gain. It's a great watch.
The biggest threat to america today is not communism it's moving america towards a facist theocracy
From around 9:30 to 12:00 minutes is a great summary of the point I'm trying to make.
I used these videos to bring up the point if you can watch them or just skim through the them and retain any information. With an individual like
Frank Zappa, who actually has creativity, he interprets the constitution the way it is meant to be. While the people he is arguing against interpret
the constitution so wrong. The say he is unintelligent and dumb, while he is making a better point that anyone else. His job was a lot harder than
writing what your editor tells you to, or being a corporate representative merely financed by corporations you represent and look at votes as merely
consent forms to be governed.
An issue brought up on crossfire was that words have context and can influence the thinking of people. While that is true, John Holtons example was
completely irrational. It seems that it is okay for mass media to influence your thinking while they interpret crucial news certain ways for not only
political influences but to control the masses. In my opinion, "programming" the masses is a lot worse than certain references in music. It's not
okay for REAL musicians to raise awareness on certain social issues that go against the status quo. In these videos the people Frank is arguing
against take songs simply referring to themes of sex, the devil, and violence are condoning them, while most of mainstream musical lyrics are mere
gimmicks and aren't actual beliefs or are telling people to condone what they're talking about. They called Ozzy Osbourne a Satanist when most of
his music is about love
However that issue has been settled since now 5 record companies control the creativity of musicians that gets played on the radio and television.
This type of corporate control of society, television, music, news, college text books, government, and other aspects of the United States is hurting
us worse than anything else is. They have taken MUSIC in general from being an actual ART (Bach, Beethoven and certain modern performers) and have
degraded it to being something like Lady Gaga. It's terrible and a disgrace. Bach and Mozart would be turning in their graves of what music has
become and our founding fathers would be turning in their graves if they saw how our government has rapped the constitution when they fought with
their hands and minds for this nation be a country.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.