What are your views on Gay marriage?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 28-8-2010 @ 08:15 PM by CynicalM
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck



IMHO,marriage is a joining of a man and a woman with the sole intent of starting a family..Something a gay couple can not do alone..

I know I'll get flamed (as usual) but I am NOT against Gays or them being together..

Just let them use a different term for their partnership..



reply posted on 28-8-2010 @ 08:18 PM by Romantic_Rebel
reply to post by CynicalM



There are sperm banks and women or lesbian couples who wouldn't mind becoming pregnant like that. Also there's adoption and I know how hard it is for kid's to get adopted.


reply posted on 28-8-2010 @ 08:21 PM by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by CynicalM



So should people who are unwilling or unable to have kids not ever get married? That is silly; marriage is a union, for companionship. If people, gay or straight, want to be together, what right does anyone have to stop them?


reply posted on 28-8-2010 @ 08:21 PM by Romantic_Rebel
reply to post by eNumbra



I was thinking that earlier. What would happen if Churches, Mosque and other religious temples were forced to hold marriage ceremony's for gay and lesbian couples. Can you imagine murders of same sex couples being murdered by religious adherents. That would be terrible.


reply posted on 28-8-2010 @ 08:24 PM by CynicalM
reply to post by Romantic_Rebel



Something a gay couple can not do alone..


Yes I know all that..I defended the rights of Gays to have children in another thread that was argueing who made the best parents...


reply posted on 28-8-2010 @ 08:28 PM by CynicalM
reply to post by InvisibleAlbatross



If people, gay or straight, want to be together, what right does anyone have to stop them?


I have already said I have no issues with that..

It is just my opinion that the term "marriage" should be between a man and a woman...

Sheesh, no amount of argument will change my opinion on this, it's just how I was raised..
Afterall, its just a term that we all can choose to define as we wish..


reply posted on 28-8-2010 @ 08:31 PM by snowspirit
Originally posted by CynicalM
reply to
post by JohnnyCanuck



IMHO,marriage is a joining of a man and a woman with the sole intent of starting a family..Something a gay couple can not do alone..

I know I'll get flamed (as usual) but I am NOT against Gays or them being together..

Just let them use a different term for their partnership..


That's like saying I'm not allowed to legally marry my common law partner, because I already had my son, and have taken measures to not get pregnant ever again. Plus I am getting older now, so no more babies.

So I can't marry my common law husband, only because a family is not being started.



reply posted on 28-8-2010 @ 08:31 PM by americandingbat
reply to post by CynicalM



Unfortunately, it's also a legal term that carries with it certain privileges that are recognized at a federal level.


reply posted on 28-8-2010 @ 08:33 PM by Romantic_Rebel
reply to post by Mak Manto



What is a civil marriage? Do marriages necessary have to make place in a religious temple? I do know their are chapels in Nevada.


reply posted on 28-8-2010 @ 08:35 PM by Greensage
Marriage is an institution of the Church, it always has been. I am against Gay Marriage because it involves people who want to shove this down the throats of the Church and mock them in it. This need to have a "Marriage" is vindictive and based on anger.

I am Gay, I have been with my partner for 22 years, we do not want to get Married because for all intents and purposes we are already committed to each other.

What would be correct and legal would be to allow us to register as Civil Union so the State and Feds recognize us as such. I am now nearing 50-years-old, as is my partner, we met when we were in our early 20's while serving in the Military. It is such an odd thought that if one of us dies we will have to pay additional taxes on those items we absorb, such as cars, homes, and other investments. We will not have the luxury of saying, well he is my Spouse, because the law does not recognize that. Doesn't this make sense?

Furthermore, as a Spouse one or the other of us should be entitled to any Social Security if that should be required. Why? Because that is what Heterosexual couples employ and some of them do not have a Marriage and are only "Common Law", but that doesn't even pertain to same-sex couples.

Now don't get me wrong, personally I do not think Social Security will last any longer than any other Government Bureaucracy. I am an "end-times" person and I am not betting on them! LOL

Wake up Homos, Girlfriends, Sisters, and Butch Muffies alike; wake up to the foolishness of a bunch of bitter Queens wanting to play Religious Police because they are not acceptable in the eyes of the Church!


reply posted on 28-8-2010 @ 08:36 PM by CynicalM
reply to post by americandingbat



Yes, thats really the crux of the problem, not the term "marriage"

The law SHOULD recognise the partnership of two people regardless of their sex..

Many pollies are too scared of the backlash from the church..
Thats the issue, not the name on the certificate, IMHO...


reply posted on 28-8-2010 @ 08:37 PM by Romantic_Rebel
reply to post by greeneyedleo



I wished they said that during the Monica Lewinsky scandal. Even though marriage wasn't evolved in the issue. Gay's and Lesbians are alright people. Marriage is marriage. I think what is different is that in America adult themes have already been too much that having same sex themes is not about love but more about adult nature.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Do I have freedom FROM religion?
  Posted 2 days ago with 34 member flags
Is this the only politician in europe that is not blind?
  Posted 2 days ago with 8 member flags
Former NAVY SEAL Rebukes Obama
  Posted 17 days ago with 7 member flags
What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
Newsweek Cover: \'The First Gay President\'
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags
Westboro Baptist Church
  Posted 12 days ago with 4 member flags
Congress Revolts On Obama Plan That Would Ban ‘Buy American’
  Posted 19 days ago with 3 member flags
Police Pursue 4-Year-Old for Overdue Library Book
  Posted 13 days ago with 3 member flags