My dear friend,
Originally posted by stereologist
It is the person that makes the claims to support it.
The OP is, your not! Your claiming he is wrong just by your word without providing a counter debate. It works both ways.
Providing links to hoax sites is hardly useful.
Thats your opinion, as is this of the OP's. If your claiming he is presenting links to hoax websites, then prove him otherwise.
It is a negative blunder to think that I have to provide support.
Your not providing anything other than negative blundering.
No, it is the person making the original claim that needs to provide supporting evidence.
Yes, the OP is providing supporting evidence, which is quite clear you dont agree with. You say he's wrong and providing nothing but hoax
information, its then up to you to provide a counter debate by PROVIDING links etc to back up your arguement/debate. Your word, by just saying " its
a hoax...bla bla " is NOT debating, its, well, negative blundering.
You seem to have the time to blunder all day long on this discussion, perhaps taking an hour out to research and provide us with links etc as to why
you disagree, would be a good thing for us all. In the meantime we have to listen to your negative blundering, which is derailing this thread from an
otherwise positive discussion.
What wealth of information is being provided?
Its quite apparent you have not read this whole thread my friend!
Torsion waves and other pseudoscientific nonsense are false claims. The scientific community recognized that this was false a long time ago. I
did provide a link to that. Did you miss that link?
Again, we have to take your word for it? Please provide supporting evidence to support this blundering, please?
And while you are there,
It seems you do not know how fields and waves are related. How are you able to understand the material at hand if you do not understand the
If that is the case that you believe to be true, then please educate us by showing that you can research and provide supporting evidence of this
Is there any chance you could provide information other than repeating hoaxes?
My dear friend, this is not how a discussion works. Your asking the OP to provide information, yet you wont? Mmm, are you familur with how this forum
works? It doesnt appear so!
You are posting about the hoax of torsion fields. You pretend that torsion fields and torsion waves are different issues. Wow. No surprise there.
Wow, why am I not suprised, MORE negative blundering. The hole is getting bigger my friend
I listened to the video on p13 and the guy is a nut.
Why do you think he is a nut?
He talks about pole shifts. Demonstrably false.
Please provide information as to why you believe this to be false, ya know, in the form of links etc.
My dear friend, instead of bringing negativity to the discussion with blundering rants, could it be possable, within the realm of your very soul, to
debate against the discussion here in a mature and positive manner, please?
Be safe be well,