It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 12GaugePermissionSlip
Oh yes, he soooo hates the private sector sooooo much that he sent 46 million new customers to the insurance companies.
www.msnbc.msn.com...
One of the main reasons progressives are starting to distance themselves from Obama is he panders to Wall St. and corporations way too much.
This law is death by a thousand cuts for small business owners. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the overhaul will cost about $115 billion more than first projected, bringing the total to more than $1 trillion. Small businesses will also now have to deal with an onslaught of new taxes and burdensome paperwork.
Source
“I don’t think you want me to waste my time to read every page of the healthcare bill,” Baucus said, according to the Flathead Beacon. “You know why? It’s statutory language. ... We hire experts.”
Your wealth envy shows and your proceeding argument is riddled with inaccuracies, misconceptions or flat out lies.
Boo-effing-hoo for them. I raised 3 kids on $37,000. How many kids do they have, 27? And how exactly do you make 250k out of necessity? I want to learn that trick.
As these figures make clear, the richest Americans are not being “overtaxed” relative to other Americans or relative to their share of national income."
The top 1% pays 30.9% of their income in taxes.
The next 4% pays 32.1%
the next 5% pays 32.2%
the next 10% pays 31.5%
the next 20% pays 30%
the next 20% pays 27%
the next 20% pays 22.3%
and the poorest of the poor with an income of $12,000 or less pays 18.7%.
Because in my America, we don't walk around like the GD Nazi SS asking for papers. Is that what you want? Then who will be next? The Irish? The Italians? You?
-- Resistance to the vast expansion of government power, intrusiveness and debt, as represented by the Tea Party movement? Why, racist resentment toward a black president.
-- Disgust and alarm with the federal government's unwillingness to curb illegal immigration, as crystallized in the Arizona law? Nativism.
-- Opposition to the most radical redefinition of marriage in human history, as expressed in Proposition 8 in California? Homophobia.
-- Opposition to a 15-story Islamic center and mosque near Ground Zero? Islamophobia.
Originally posted by centurion1211
And When i read his article, I found his descriptions fit what many liberals post here ad nauseum - everyone that disagrees with liberals is some combination of racist, bigot, or stupid.
As a comparison, conservatives call liberals none of those things. Worst you get is "misguided", or under the influence of the "kool-aid".
Originally posted by billyjack
All right I’ll explain the obvious.
1)Nationalized healthcare:
Here’s a 2000 page bill
Secondly, it is scandalous that anyone could believe a government takeover of anything
2)Cap & Trade:
3)Border Policy: Not only have the Feds made no effort to limit an influx of democratic voters
Taking over Businesses: Not only the banks,
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by 12GaugePermissionSlip
Likewise, conservatives need to move on from the birther controversy to also debate those same issues.
That is the crux of the problem, isn't it? With all the nutty accusations of Obama being a Stalinist, Marxist, Communist, Nazi, socialist, reverse racist, elitist, Muslim, Kenyan, anti-Christ. What rational debate do you expect us to have? And with who? And about what? What are the REAL issues with Obama? Can conservatives come up with a specific issue that is based in reality?
It is like trying to comfort a 4 yr old that is afraid of a dragon under his bed.
Did you read the article? What I am hoping for from liberals is something more substantial than insults and name calling as these very important to the nation are debated. I said conservatives should do the same. Are you still stuck there? Seems like it from your post.