John Stewart Shows how Stupid FOX are.......Again, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 52 times


reply posted on 26-8-2010 @ 10:37 PM by searching4truth
Here's a fun one for you guys.

www.killalljews.com

Can you guess where that leads before clicking it?

I smell a conspiracy


reply posted on 26-8-2010 @ 11:38 PM by Connector
reply to post by jibeho






I can't argue with that! So, let's add Georgetown University, a Jesuit University, and Harvard to the terror links right next to Fox.


No one can argue with that . Yes, let's add those to the list Fox SHOULD have included, but didn't.



My point is that Alwaleed is so greatly diversified that you can't pin the man down. I don't see any proof that Fox News was trying to deliberately conceal his connections to their parent company of Newscorp. Newscorp Owns a hell of a lot. Its no secret that he is a shareholder. www.kingdom.net...



He is not "only" a shareholder, but the SECOND largest., next to Murdoch himself.

Wiki...NewsCorp


Quote from source:

* Prince Alwaleed bin Talal al-Saud of Saudi Arabia, through his Kingdom Holding Company, owns 7% of News Corp.'s shares, making Kingdom Holdings the second largest shareholder.[21][22][23]




jihebo:

Anyway, is there any evidence to suggest that a deliberate failure to disclose a publicly known fact was committed by Fox? Alwaleed owns 5.7% in voting shares of News Corp.



The evidence is either in their ineptitude or agenda. Are they a NEWS WIRE service or an ENTERTAINMENT service for their CLIENT base?


Dude, I hear some of what your saying, but you have to turn that light around 180* sometimes, and look closely at what your trying to defend just for the sake of it.


reply posted on 27-8-2010 @ 12:18 AM by speculativeoptimist
reply to post by vox2442



Or you could just go to www.thedailyshow.com... and watch where its all free, better quality, and legal.

I like the show without commercials, and viewing is legal, downloading is not. I think?
Quality is same on my end...

[edit on 27-8-2010 by speculativeoptimist]


reply posted on 27-8-2010 @ 12:20 AM by vox2442
Originally posted by jibeho
I can't argue with that! So, let's add Georgetown University, a Jesuit University, and Harvard to the terror links right next to Fox.

My point is that Alwaleed is so greatly diversified that you can't pin the man down. I don't see any proof that Fox News was trying to deliberately conceal his connections to their parent company of Newscorp. Newscorp Owns a hell of a lot. Its no secret that he is a shareholder.

www.kingdom.net...

Anyway, is there any evidence to suggest that a deliberate failure to disclose a publicly known fact was committed by Fox? Alwaleed owns 5.7% in voting shares of News Corp.


[edit on 26-8-2010 by jibeho]



Here is one of the clips in question:



www.youtube.com...

I guess the deliberate failure to disclose would be: fox neither used a photo or said his name. A lot of allegations are made, but the name is withheld - the only reason I can think of is that they want to keep people from looking too closely and finding the link to Fox.

Here, Beck has similar allegations, uses a photo, but does not use his name (just calls him "this guy").



www.youtube.com...

It`s not like they don`t know who he is - he is hardly keeping a low profile.



reply posted on 27-8-2010 @ 02:38 AM by oozyism
reply to post by LucidDreamer85



LMFAO hahaha....

Man he still got it, I haven't seen his shows for a while now but he still making a mockery of those who need mockery to teach them a lesson lol.

Man funny as hell..




reply posted on 27-8-2010 @ 07:23 AM by TSZodiac
reply to post by LucidDreamer85



This is nice "spin" from Stewart - and a very funny clip - but I think he, the huffington post and the OP are missing an important message from Fox here - let me preface what I'm about to say by saying that I am not a Fox viewer, and am a registered independent who voted for Obama... that having been said, I think that this is actually scores a point FOR Fox News - they are "outing" one of their own major shareholders for doing something they feel is wrong. In other words, its more important to get the truth out than to protect their own business interests....quite refreshing ...in my estimation, Good Job Fox ! I wish the other MSM would follow their lead and start reporting the truth rather than kowtowing to their money masters. Thoughts ? Remember - Deny Ignorance, it looks to me like this is a situation where a MSM outlet is doing exactly what we want them to do !


reply posted on 27-8-2010 @ 07:55 AM by jibeho
Originally posted by TSZodiac
reply to
post by LucidDreamer85



This is nice "spin" from Stewart - and a very funny clip - but I think he, the huffington post and the OP are missing an important message from Fox here - let me preface what I'm about to say by saying that I am not a Fox viewer, and am a registered independent who voted for Obama... that having been said, I think that this is actually scores a point FOR Fox News - they are "outing" one of their own major shareholders for doing something they feel is wrong. In other words, its more important to get the truth out than to protect their own business interests....quite refreshing ...in my estimation, Good Job Fox ! I wish the other MSM would follow their lead and start reporting the truth rather than kowtowing to their money masters. Thoughts ? Remember - Deny Ignorance, it looks to me like this is a situation where a MSM outlet is doing exactly what we want them to do !


You hit the nail on the head!! Despite Alwaleed's stock ownership and funding of the the mosque, all of Fox News' leading commentators and hosts have speaking out against the mosque plan and have suggested that it be built elsewhere. Sure Beck pointed him out but didn't name him. Alwaleed is not new to the nation or to New Yorkers. Remember when Guiliani refused his $10 million check after the 9/11 attacks.

Alwaleed has been bitter ever since!!!! and will use his wealth in every way possible!! Just like George Soros and others like them.

I am going to stop trying to defend Fox here. They don't control who invests in a parent company or how those investors are able to influence decisions with the all mighty dollar. I think it has been clearly shown that Alwaleed is trying to spread his influence all over the West in an effort to advance Islam.


Lets all look at what is really going on with this man and study his agenda.

Here is a great article on him that made my head spin.

Fox connection to Alwaleed
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Have You Seen the Attention-Grabbing New TIME Cover?
  Posted 18 days ago with 31 member flags
"I AM" the documentary in full on Youtube
  Posted 19 days ago with 11 member flags
The one topic even TED won\'t touch: Income Inequality
  Posted 12 days ago with 10 member flags
Denying Ignorance about Copyright
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags
Dan Rather Slams Corporate Media
  Posted 8 days ago with 9 member flags