reply to post by VirginiaRisesYetAgain
All intresting points.. Little advice, and take it for what its worth. You defeat your purpose by asking people to respond, then ridiculing them for
not having your view on things.
Did planes hit the WTC? Yes
Did a plane hit the Pnetagon? - Yes (all of those non military witnesses cant be lying and giving the exact same story without a conspiracy
As i stated before, what happened that day cannot be repeated in any lab / controlled test. You dont like the Government investigation, thats fine.
Submit your evidence to the courts using the argument the government has failed to protect its citizens well being and go from there.
As far as the comments about the 1st world trade centr attack not being relevant, it very much is. A lot of the conpsiracies usrrounding the 2nd
attack is there was no such thing as al queida before the Bush administration. The conspiracy theories have developed a thought process that it was
all an inside job, and that Bin Laden is a fiment of peoples imagination, conjured up by the very Government that is being accused of murdering 3000
A conspiracy of the magnitude you are suggesting can not be kept quiet. Obama would have flung the doors wide open on it, as well as both house of
Congress, who have agency reports coming directly to them.
For every person who saiys this is not possible, there is a person who can show you it is possible. People are looking to make a cospiracy of the
millenium by arguing the government investigation is a lie. The evidence used to support this argument however, is the evidence the government used.
The Government said A and B happened, which resulted in C. Someone with a theory takes the same and says it cant be done this way because of facter x,
y and Z.
The sheer number of people that would have to be involved in a conspiracy this large would be massive. You have foriegn citizens who were killed,
mauinly from very close allied countries, who would pound the war drums if they event smelled coverup in the air with the chances it might be
Keep asking questions, and someday you may find your answers that you want. It has been almost 10 years, with enough changes in the Federal
Government, where if it were an inside job, it would have been disclosed by now to the public. We are a few months from the midterms.. who knows, it
might come out then.
While I would like to thank you for inviting me to partake, then acting like an arrogant ass in your reponses, I think I will pass and move onto a
thread that has a bit more open mindedness to the debate and questions posed.
As an afterthought, the theory you are suggesting is not your theory, but many other peoples theories wrapped into one. You can twist information any
way you, or even the Government, sees fit. The only way you are going to get people to take it serisouly though is to be open minded enough to accept
that a theory might have flaws. It doesnt discount the theory out of hand though.
The more debunkers run the Custer Defense, the more it looks like the Government coering stuff up all over again.
Also, I did not leave anything out of my response to yours. I was demonstrating that Al Queida does exist, and has always existed. That BinLaden
exists, and has always existed. Demonstrating that the theory the government is behind the attacks completely disregards the fact their is enough
evidence available to show otherwise. The Government has shown this, and people refuse to beleive it.
Why is that? Politics? Someone needing to feel special? Hatred for the Government, Hatred of Republicans? Americans tend to overcomplicate things, and
often refuse to believe it when a resolution i spresented to them that is clear cut and concise.
America spent 2 million dollars devloping a pen that can write in space.
The soviets used a pencil.
Eliminate the impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.