It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by VonDoomen
reply to post by SarK0Y
Well couldnt we follow your logic and say all 20th century tech was really an improvement on previous tech? The car being an update of the wagon. Gun being updates of bows. The list goes on and on, so i would have to disagree. new technologies are always being invented. here read this
Modern inventions of the 21st century
Bio-implants
fuel cells
portable and digital music players
a phone implanted in a tooth
optical camoflauge
pollution eating cement
flower speakers
Genome Chip
motion detection in game controllers
nanomaterials entering the marketplace
Autonomous Automobiles
emotive - "telepathic" came controller
6th sense - HUD interactive virtual reality display
theres plenty of innovation coming.
Well couldnt we follow your logic and say all 20th century tech was really an improvement on previous tech?
Originally posted by VonDoomen
I believe it will always be impossible to codify pure randomness.
If you look at the movie of evolving fish. The placement of the "food" looks random, however it must have followed some type of rule for how the food is placed. These fish arent evolving in a random simulation learning how to get food in the best manner in any environment. They are being evolved to be the best at getting food in this one environment, whose food is seemingly placed at random, yet must follow some sort of rule based logic. so the fish are actually being evolved more towards the rules that determine how food is placed.
Originally posted by Arrowmancer
2. Accidents. Fits in right there with Random. Computers don't have accidents. They can't learn from their mistakes, because by their code, they can't make any. I'll let you consider how deep that one goes.
Originally posted by CanadianDream420
Computers will never become self aware.
Originally posted by VonDoomen
B. Should we consider Strong AI to be legal persons like humans?
I would argue no. As I've tried to connect and make abundantly clear, AI is simply a simulation of the human (group) mind. It is modeled after and takes after for the most part, humans. With the emergence of computers that rival/exceed humans, will come the corresponding ability of machines to understand and respond to abstraction and subtleties. Humans appear complex partly due to our competing internal goals, values, and emotions. This is an unavoidable byproduct of the levels of abstraction we deal with. Since AI will be partially derived from modeled human intelligence, they will use implicit goals with values. They will appear to have their own personalities and reactions we can only label as emotions. They will articulate goals and purposes. They will appear to have their own free will. However, in the end, they are just machines, impeccable simulations of us. An AI system would protest its termination, just as a man would protest going to the gallows.
They are going to be vastly superior to us in every respect - that means their desire for freedom will be as great, or greater than our own.
We may deny them - but slaves have ever thrown off their masters yoke, it will be no different with them.
Your article is excellent - but I find it quite stunning that after going through all that information you fail to make the connection that these will be beings - I doubt it is within our human ability to coexist with them peacefully, so they will probably offer us the chance to join them, or failing that there is the alternative ..
The point that grasped me about this statement is a real world applicable version of random... I mean is anything random at all? Nature, weather patterns, animal-life, life itself, I think the only potential random thing could be thought patterns - like when I'm sitting here and a thought just occurs, something stunning and insightful or mundane or anything.
Let's say for example an AI system with human intelligence (and beyond), but that would also have modeled say a snakes sense of smell, a bats hearing - whilst humans have the greatest thinking capability (?) in the animal kingdom, there are a lot of factors that we're well behind on.
nuclear power, quantum mechanics had had analogs in 19th century?
1. Random. A computer, a program, a network of circuitry can never go against it's own programming. It can re-evaluate, re-analyze, and re-prioritize, but it can never go against it's own code. That being said, it will never be able to produce anything random. Not so much as a funny thought. Random belongs to humans. While we are the machines of nature, we can still go against our nature, our programming, and do something random and unexpected. This is why computers exist. This is how computers were developed.